Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A classification-regression (CART) study

S. D'Alisa, G. Miscio, S. Baudo, A. Simone, L. Tesio, A. Mauro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis has been often measured through the SF-36 questionnaire. In this study, validation of the SF-36 summary scores, its 'physical' component, and its 'mental' component was attempted by exploring the joint predictive power of disability (EDSS score), of anxiety and depression (HADS-A and -D scores, respectively), and of disease duration, progression type, age, gender and marital status. Method. The sample consisted of 75 patients suffering from multiple sclerosis admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. The interplay between potential predictors was assessed through a particular regression model (classification and regression tree, CART). Two main advantages of this technique are its robustness with respect to distributional assumptions (rarely met by scores coming in from questionnaires) and its sensitivity to high-order interactions, between independent variables, difficult to detect through conventional multiple regression. Results. Predictive variables for physical component of the SF-36 were EDSS and HADS-D (36.8% variance explanation). The only predictive variable for mental component of SF-36 was HADS-D (39.1% variance explanation). Conclusion. Results confirm previous findings showing that in patients with multiple sclerosis quality of life is heavily determined by person's mood, whatever his/her neurological or functional severity. The usefulness and validity of the SF-36 as an index representative of quality of life is debatable, as long as depression explains much of its variance. Further refinement of quality of life definition and measurement is worth further psychometric and statistical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-314
Number of pages8
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Quality of Life
Depression
Marital Status
Psychometrics
Disease Progression
Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Anxiety
Joints
Research
4-amino-4'-hydroxylaminodiphenylsulfone
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • CART
  • Depression
  • EDSS
  • Measure
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Quality of life
  • SF-36

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis : A classification-regression (CART) study. / D'Alisa, S.; Miscio, G.; Baudo, S.; Simone, A.; Tesio, L.; Mauro, A.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 28, No. 5, 03.2006, p. 307-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab3774d89d1943fc8cb72f43d25153a5,
title = "Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A classification-regression (CART) study",
abstract = "Purpose. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis has been often measured through the SF-36 questionnaire. In this study, validation of the SF-36 summary scores, its 'physical' component, and its 'mental' component was attempted by exploring the joint predictive power of disability (EDSS score), of anxiety and depression (HADS-A and -D scores, respectively), and of disease duration, progression type, age, gender and marital status. Method. The sample consisted of 75 patients suffering from multiple sclerosis admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. The interplay between potential predictors was assessed through a particular regression model (classification and regression tree, CART). Two main advantages of this technique are its robustness with respect to distributional assumptions (rarely met by scores coming in from questionnaires) and its sensitivity to high-order interactions, between independent variables, difficult to detect through conventional multiple regression. Results. Predictive variables for physical component of the SF-36 were EDSS and HADS-D (36.8{\%} variance explanation). The only predictive variable for mental component of SF-36 was HADS-D (39.1{\%} variance explanation). Conclusion. Results confirm previous findings showing that in patients with multiple sclerosis quality of life is heavily determined by person's mood, whatever his/her neurological or functional severity. The usefulness and validity of the SF-36 as an index representative of quality of life is debatable, as long as depression explains much of its variance. Further refinement of quality of life definition and measurement is worth further psychometric and statistical research.",
keywords = "CART, Depression, EDSS, Measure, Multiple sclerosis, Quality of life, SF-36",
author = "S. D'Alisa and G. Miscio and S. Baudo and A. Simone and L. Tesio and A. Mauro",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09638280500191753",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "307--314",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis

T2 - A classification-regression (CART) study

AU - D'Alisa, S.

AU - Miscio, G.

AU - Baudo, S.

AU - Simone, A.

AU - Tesio, L.

AU - Mauro, A.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Purpose. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis has been often measured through the SF-36 questionnaire. In this study, validation of the SF-36 summary scores, its 'physical' component, and its 'mental' component was attempted by exploring the joint predictive power of disability (EDSS score), of anxiety and depression (HADS-A and -D scores, respectively), and of disease duration, progression type, age, gender and marital status. Method. The sample consisted of 75 patients suffering from multiple sclerosis admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. The interplay between potential predictors was assessed through a particular regression model (classification and regression tree, CART). Two main advantages of this technique are its robustness with respect to distributional assumptions (rarely met by scores coming in from questionnaires) and its sensitivity to high-order interactions, between independent variables, difficult to detect through conventional multiple regression. Results. Predictive variables for physical component of the SF-36 were EDSS and HADS-D (36.8% variance explanation). The only predictive variable for mental component of SF-36 was HADS-D (39.1% variance explanation). Conclusion. Results confirm previous findings showing that in patients with multiple sclerosis quality of life is heavily determined by person's mood, whatever his/her neurological or functional severity. The usefulness and validity of the SF-36 as an index representative of quality of life is debatable, as long as depression explains much of its variance. Further refinement of quality of life definition and measurement is worth further psychometric and statistical research.

AB - Purpose. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis has been often measured through the SF-36 questionnaire. In this study, validation of the SF-36 summary scores, its 'physical' component, and its 'mental' component was attempted by exploring the joint predictive power of disability (EDSS score), of anxiety and depression (HADS-A and -D scores, respectively), and of disease duration, progression type, age, gender and marital status. Method. The sample consisted of 75 patients suffering from multiple sclerosis admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. The interplay between potential predictors was assessed through a particular regression model (classification and regression tree, CART). Two main advantages of this technique are its robustness with respect to distributional assumptions (rarely met by scores coming in from questionnaires) and its sensitivity to high-order interactions, between independent variables, difficult to detect through conventional multiple regression. Results. Predictive variables for physical component of the SF-36 were EDSS and HADS-D (36.8% variance explanation). The only predictive variable for mental component of SF-36 was HADS-D (39.1% variance explanation). Conclusion. Results confirm previous findings showing that in patients with multiple sclerosis quality of life is heavily determined by person's mood, whatever his/her neurological or functional severity. The usefulness and validity of the SF-36 as an index representative of quality of life is debatable, as long as depression explains much of its variance. Further refinement of quality of life definition and measurement is worth further psychometric and statistical research.

KW - CART

KW - Depression

KW - EDSS

KW - Measure

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Quality of life

KW - SF-36

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644583206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644583206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638280500191753

DO - 10.1080/09638280500191753

M3 - Article

C2 - 16492625

AN - SCOPUS:33644583206

VL - 28

SP - 307

EP - 314

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 5

ER -