Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards

S. Mandic-Rajcevic, F. M. Rubino, G. Vianello, L. Fugnoli, Elisa Polledri, Rosa Mercadante, A. Moretto, Silvia Fustinoni, C. Colosio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Models used in the pre-marketing evaluation do not cover all work scenarios and may over-or underestimate exposure. Objectives: Uncertainties present in the extrapolation from pre-marketing to the post-marketing warrant exposure and risk assessment in real-life working conditions. Methods: Seven vineyard pesticide applicators were followed for a total of 12 work-days. A data collection sheet was developed specifically for this study. Workers' body exposure, hands, and head exposure were measured. Tebuconazole was analyzed using LCMS/ MS. Results: Median potential and actual body exposures were 22.41 mg/kg and 0.49 mg/kg of active substance applied, respectively. The median protection factor provided by the coverall was 98% (range: 90-99%). Hand exposure was responsible for 61% of total actual exposure, and was reduced by more than 50% in workers using gloves. The German Model underestimated the exposure in one work-day, and grossly overestimated it in 3 workdays. Conclusions: High levels of potential body exposure were efficiently controlled by the cotton coverall. Use of personal protective devices, especially chemically-resistant gloves and head cover is the main determinant of skin protection. Field studies on pesticide exposure in real-life conditions and development of methods and tools for easier risk assessment are necessary to complement and confirm the risk assessment done in the authorization process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-315
Number of pages22
JournalMedicina del Lavoro
Volume106
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Marketing
Pesticides
Skin
Hand
Head
Protective Devices
Uncertainty
tebuconazole
Farms

Keywords

  • Conazoles
  • dermal dosimetry
  • pesticide application

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mandic-Rajcevic, S., Rubino, F. M., Vianello, G., Fugnoli, L., Polledri, E., Mercadante, R., ... Colosio, C. (2015). Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards. Medicina del Lavoro, 106(4), 294-315.

Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards. / Mandic-Rajcevic, S.; Rubino, F. M.; Vianello, G.; Fugnoli, L.; Polledri, Elisa; Mercadante, Rosa; Moretto, A.; Fustinoni, Silvia; Colosio, C.

In: Medicina del Lavoro, Vol. 106, No. 4, 2015, p. 294-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mandic-Rajcevic, S, Rubino, FM, Vianello, G, Fugnoli, L, Polledri, E, Mercadante, R, Moretto, A, Fustinoni, S & Colosio, C 2015, 'Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards', Medicina del Lavoro, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 294-315.
Mandic-Rajcevic S, Rubino FM, Vianello G, Fugnoli L, Polledri E, Mercadante R et al. Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards. Medicina del Lavoro. 2015;106(4):294-315.
Mandic-Rajcevic, S. ; Rubino, F. M. ; Vianello, G. ; Fugnoli, L. ; Polledri, Elisa ; Mercadante, Rosa ; Moretto, A. ; Fustinoni, Silvia ; Colosio, C. / Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards. In: Medicina del Lavoro. 2015 ; Vol. 106, No. 4. pp. 294-315.
@article{45ca37ff3dc447798967b1b25cbd7ee1,
title = "Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards",
abstract = "Introduction: Models used in the pre-marketing evaluation do not cover all work scenarios and may over-or underestimate exposure. Objectives: Uncertainties present in the extrapolation from pre-marketing to the post-marketing warrant exposure and risk assessment in real-life working conditions. Methods: Seven vineyard pesticide applicators were followed for a total of 12 work-days. A data collection sheet was developed specifically for this study. Workers' body exposure, hands, and head exposure were measured. Tebuconazole was analyzed using LCMS/ MS. Results: Median potential and actual body exposures were 22.41 mg/kg and 0.49 mg/kg of active substance applied, respectively. The median protection factor provided by the coverall was 98{\%} (range: 90-99{\%}). Hand exposure was responsible for 61{\%} of total actual exposure, and was reduced by more than 50{\%} in workers using gloves. The German Model underestimated the exposure in one work-day, and grossly overestimated it in 3 workdays. Conclusions: High levels of potential body exposure were efficiently controlled by the cotton coverall. Use of personal protective devices, especially chemically-resistant gloves and head cover is the main determinant of skin protection. Field studies on pesticide exposure in real-life conditions and development of methods and tools for easier risk assessment are necessary to complement and confirm the risk assessment done in the authorization process.",
keywords = "Conazoles, dermal dosimetry, pesticide application",
author = "S. Mandic-Rajcevic and Rubino, {F. M.} and G. Vianello and L. Fugnoli and Elisa Polledri and Rosa Mercadante and A. Moretto and Silvia Fustinoni and C. Colosio",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "294--315",
journal = "Medicina del Lavoro",
issn = "0025-7818",
publisher = "Mattioli 1885 S.p.A.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dermal exposure and risk assessment of tebuconazole applicators in vineyards

AU - Mandic-Rajcevic, S.

AU - Rubino, F. M.

AU - Vianello, G.

AU - Fugnoli, L.

AU - Polledri, Elisa

AU - Mercadante, Rosa

AU - Moretto, A.

AU - Fustinoni, Silvia

AU - Colosio, C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: Models used in the pre-marketing evaluation do not cover all work scenarios and may over-or underestimate exposure. Objectives: Uncertainties present in the extrapolation from pre-marketing to the post-marketing warrant exposure and risk assessment in real-life working conditions. Methods: Seven vineyard pesticide applicators were followed for a total of 12 work-days. A data collection sheet was developed specifically for this study. Workers' body exposure, hands, and head exposure were measured. Tebuconazole was analyzed using LCMS/ MS. Results: Median potential and actual body exposures were 22.41 mg/kg and 0.49 mg/kg of active substance applied, respectively. The median protection factor provided by the coverall was 98% (range: 90-99%). Hand exposure was responsible for 61% of total actual exposure, and was reduced by more than 50% in workers using gloves. The German Model underestimated the exposure in one work-day, and grossly overestimated it in 3 workdays. Conclusions: High levels of potential body exposure were efficiently controlled by the cotton coverall. Use of personal protective devices, especially chemically-resistant gloves and head cover is the main determinant of skin protection. Field studies on pesticide exposure in real-life conditions and development of methods and tools for easier risk assessment are necessary to complement and confirm the risk assessment done in the authorization process.

AB - Introduction: Models used in the pre-marketing evaluation do not cover all work scenarios and may over-or underestimate exposure. Objectives: Uncertainties present in the extrapolation from pre-marketing to the post-marketing warrant exposure and risk assessment in real-life working conditions. Methods: Seven vineyard pesticide applicators were followed for a total of 12 work-days. A data collection sheet was developed specifically for this study. Workers' body exposure, hands, and head exposure were measured. Tebuconazole was analyzed using LCMS/ MS. Results: Median potential and actual body exposures were 22.41 mg/kg and 0.49 mg/kg of active substance applied, respectively. The median protection factor provided by the coverall was 98% (range: 90-99%). Hand exposure was responsible for 61% of total actual exposure, and was reduced by more than 50% in workers using gloves. The German Model underestimated the exposure in one work-day, and grossly overestimated it in 3 workdays. Conclusions: High levels of potential body exposure were efficiently controlled by the cotton coverall. Use of personal protective devices, especially chemically-resistant gloves and head cover is the main determinant of skin protection. Field studies on pesticide exposure in real-life conditions and development of methods and tools for easier risk assessment are necessary to complement and confirm the risk assessment done in the authorization process.

KW - Conazoles

KW - dermal dosimetry

KW - pesticide application

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944460094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944460094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26154472

AN - SCOPUS:84944460094

VL - 106

SP - 294

EP - 315

JO - Medicina del Lavoro

JF - Medicina del Lavoro

SN - 0025-7818

IS - 4

ER -