Descriptive study about congruence in wheelchair prescription

M. Cherubini, G. Melchiorri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. Wheelchair prescription is relevant in the prevention of muscular joint pathology, and to facilitate autonomy and the patient's social life. However, in order to reach this goal, respecting the standards with a client-centred approach is essential. Congruence between user ability and wheelchair characteristics by making wheelchairs more "user friendly" can improve patient independence, facilitate integration into society and improve the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyse congruence of wheelchair use by our patients, through the consideration of specific recommendations related to each subject's individual clinical situation. The second aim of the paper was to improve wheelchair prescriptions, by identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs. Design. Observational study, outpatient. Population. One hundred-fifty wheelchair users (average age 46.7± 17.3) were analysed and described at 16.2± 8.5 years from the onset of their disability. The subjects were 80 males and 70 females. Results. Sixty-eight percent of the wheelchairs were not suitable for the patients, while 32% were suitable. We reported the incidence of non-congruence with respect to each wheelchair part. Conclusion. After finding a correlation between the prescription sources and suitability, the authors suggested that wheelchair prescriptions should be carried out in specialized departments, or that physician competences, and collaboration between physicians and technicians must be improved. Our data indicates the necessity to pay more attention to wheelchair prescription while considering ergonomie fitting to the individual. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs in this paper could help to make more appropriate prescriptions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-222
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume48
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Wheelchairs
Prescriptions
Physicians
Aptitude
Mental Competency
Observational Studies
Outpatients
Rehabilitation
Joints
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Disability evaluation
  • Inappropriate prescribing
  • Wheelchairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Descriptive study about congruence in wheelchair prescription. / Cherubini, M.; Melchiorri, G.

In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 217-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e305ce8fc8634450a1589bc645db2a37,
title = "Descriptive study about congruence in wheelchair prescription",
abstract = "Aim. Wheelchair prescription is relevant in the prevention of muscular joint pathology, and to facilitate autonomy and the patient's social life. However, in order to reach this goal, respecting the standards with a client-centred approach is essential. Congruence between user ability and wheelchair characteristics by making wheelchairs more {"}user friendly{"} can improve patient independence, facilitate integration into society and improve the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyse congruence of wheelchair use by our patients, through the consideration of specific recommendations related to each subject's individual clinical situation. The second aim of the paper was to improve wheelchair prescriptions, by identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs. Design. Observational study, outpatient. Population. One hundred-fifty wheelchair users (average age 46.7± 17.3) were analysed and described at 16.2± 8.5 years from the onset of their disability. The subjects were 80 males and 70 females. Results. Sixty-eight percent of the wheelchairs were not suitable for the patients, while 32{\%} were suitable. We reported the incidence of non-congruence with respect to each wheelchair part. Conclusion. After finding a correlation between the prescription sources and suitability, the authors suggested that wheelchair prescriptions should be carried out in specialized departments, or that physician competences, and collaboration between physicians and technicians must be improved. Our data indicates the necessity to pay more attention to wheelchair prescription while considering ergonomie fitting to the individual. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs in this paper could help to make more appropriate prescriptions.",
keywords = "Disability evaluation, Inappropriate prescribing, Wheelchairs",
author = "M. Cherubini and G. Melchiorri",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "217--222",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1973-9087",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Descriptive study about congruence in wheelchair prescription

AU - Cherubini, M.

AU - Melchiorri, G.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Aim. Wheelchair prescription is relevant in the prevention of muscular joint pathology, and to facilitate autonomy and the patient's social life. However, in order to reach this goal, respecting the standards with a client-centred approach is essential. Congruence between user ability and wheelchair characteristics by making wheelchairs more "user friendly" can improve patient independence, facilitate integration into society and improve the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyse congruence of wheelchair use by our patients, through the consideration of specific recommendations related to each subject's individual clinical situation. The second aim of the paper was to improve wheelchair prescriptions, by identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs. Design. Observational study, outpatient. Population. One hundred-fifty wheelchair users (average age 46.7± 17.3) were analysed and described at 16.2± 8.5 years from the onset of their disability. The subjects were 80 males and 70 females. Results. Sixty-eight percent of the wheelchairs were not suitable for the patients, while 32% were suitable. We reported the incidence of non-congruence with respect to each wheelchair part. Conclusion. After finding a correlation between the prescription sources and suitability, the authors suggested that wheelchair prescriptions should be carried out in specialized departments, or that physician competences, and collaboration between physicians and technicians must be improved. Our data indicates the necessity to pay more attention to wheelchair prescription while considering ergonomie fitting to the individual. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs in this paper could help to make more appropriate prescriptions.

AB - Aim. Wheelchair prescription is relevant in the prevention of muscular joint pathology, and to facilitate autonomy and the patient's social life. However, in order to reach this goal, respecting the standards with a client-centred approach is essential. Congruence between user ability and wheelchair characteristics by making wheelchairs more "user friendly" can improve patient independence, facilitate integration into society and improve the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyse congruence of wheelchair use by our patients, through the consideration of specific recommendations related to each subject's individual clinical situation. The second aim of the paper was to improve wheelchair prescriptions, by identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs. Design. Observational study, outpatient. Population. One hundred-fifty wheelchair users (average age 46.7± 17.3) were analysed and described at 16.2± 8.5 years from the onset of their disability. The subjects were 80 males and 70 females. Results. Sixty-eight percent of the wheelchairs were not suitable for the patients, while 32% were suitable. We reported the incidence of non-congruence with respect to each wheelchair part. Conclusion. After finding a correlation between the prescription sources and suitability, the authors suggested that wheelchair prescriptions should be carried out in specialized departments, or that physician competences, and collaboration between physicians and technicians must be improved. Our data indicates the necessity to pay more attention to wheelchair prescription while considering ergonomie fitting to the individual. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Identifying the most frequent mistakes in the prescription and construction of wheelchairs in this paper could help to make more appropriate prescriptions.

KW - Disability evaluation

KW - Inappropriate prescribing

KW - Wheelchairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864437958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864437958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21654593

AN - SCOPUS:84864437958

VL - 48

SP - 217

EP - 222

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1973-9087

IS - 2

ER -