Detection of sleep onset by analysis of slow eye movements: A preliminary study of MSLT recordings

Margherita Fabbri, Federica Provini, Elisa Magosso, Anna Zaniboni, Antonietta Bisulli, Giuseppe Plazzi, Mauro Ursino, Pasquale Montagna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) adversely impacts daily activity and quality of life. Evaluation of EDS should be as easy and effective as possible. Multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) represents the standard in EDS evaluation. It is, however, a long and expensive test. Slow eye movements (SEMs) occurring at the wake-sleep transition could be an easy and reliable marker of sleepiness. We have developed an automatic method for the detection of SEMs. In the present preliminary work we compare standard measurement of EDS with visual and automatic detection of SEMs, both performed on MSLT recordings. Methods: We compared sleep latency, obtained upon standard analysis of MSLT with visually and automatically detected SEM latency, in MSLT tests performed in a population of 20 subjects, (10 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) patients and 10 patients with normal MSLT). Results: There were no significant differences between SEMs latency and standard determined sleep latency both in OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Automatic and visual analysis of SEMs gave comparable results. Both SEMs latency and sleep latency were significantly shorter in OSAS patients than normal MSLT patients. Conclusion: SEMs can be easily detected automatically and represent an effective marker of sleepiness in those conditions usually characterised by sleep onset with NREM sleep. Their performance equals that of standard measurements of sleep onset in MSLT recordings at least for OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Our study is, however, still preliminary and needs confirmation on a larger number of patients and in other clinical conditions characterised by EDS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-640
Number of pages4
JournalSleep Medicine
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Sleep
Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

  • Excessive daytime sleepiness
  • Multiple sleep latency test
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
  • Sleep
  • Sleep onset
  • Slow eye movements
  • Somnolence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Detection of sleep onset by analysis of slow eye movements : A preliminary study of MSLT recordings. / Fabbri, Margherita; Provini, Federica; Magosso, Elisa; Zaniboni, Anna; Bisulli, Antonietta; Plazzi, Giuseppe; Ursino, Mauro; Montagna, Pasquale.

In: Sleep Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 637-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fabbri, Margherita ; Provini, Federica ; Magosso, Elisa ; Zaniboni, Anna ; Bisulli, Antonietta ; Plazzi, Giuseppe ; Ursino, Mauro ; Montagna, Pasquale. / Detection of sleep onset by analysis of slow eye movements : A preliminary study of MSLT recordings. In: Sleep Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 637-640.
@article{faf055e4c28e429ba7ac9565612302d7,
title = "Detection of sleep onset by analysis of slow eye movements: A preliminary study of MSLT recordings",
abstract = "Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) adversely impacts daily activity and quality of life. Evaluation of EDS should be as easy and effective as possible. Multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) represents the standard in EDS evaluation. It is, however, a long and expensive test. Slow eye movements (SEMs) occurring at the wake-sleep transition could be an easy and reliable marker of sleepiness. We have developed an automatic method for the detection of SEMs. In the present preliminary work we compare standard measurement of EDS with visual and automatic detection of SEMs, both performed on MSLT recordings. Methods: We compared sleep latency, obtained upon standard analysis of MSLT with visually and automatically detected SEM latency, in MSLT tests performed in a population of 20 subjects, (10 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) patients and 10 patients with normal MSLT). Results: There were no significant differences between SEMs latency and standard determined sleep latency both in OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Automatic and visual analysis of SEMs gave comparable results. Both SEMs latency and sleep latency were significantly shorter in OSAS patients than normal MSLT patients. Conclusion: SEMs can be easily detected automatically and represent an effective marker of sleepiness in those conditions usually characterised by sleep onset with NREM sleep. Their performance equals that of standard measurements of sleep onset in MSLT recordings at least for OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Our study is, however, still preliminary and needs confirmation on a larger number of patients and in other clinical conditions characterised by EDS.",
keywords = "Excessive daytime sleepiness, Multiple sleep latency test, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Sleep, Sleep onset, Slow eye movements, Somnolence",
author = "Margherita Fabbri and Federica Provini and Elisa Magosso and Anna Zaniboni and Antonietta Bisulli and Giuseppe Plazzi and Mauro Ursino and Pasquale Montagna",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.sleep.2008.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "637--640",
journal = "Sleep Medicine",
issn = "1389-9457",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of sleep onset by analysis of slow eye movements

T2 - A preliminary study of MSLT recordings

AU - Fabbri, Margherita

AU - Provini, Federica

AU - Magosso, Elisa

AU - Zaniboni, Anna

AU - Bisulli, Antonietta

AU - Plazzi, Giuseppe

AU - Ursino, Mauro

AU - Montagna, Pasquale

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) adversely impacts daily activity and quality of life. Evaluation of EDS should be as easy and effective as possible. Multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) represents the standard in EDS evaluation. It is, however, a long and expensive test. Slow eye movements (SEMs) occurring at the wake-sleep transition could be an easy and reliable marker of sleepiness. We have developed an automatic method for the detection of SEMs. In the present preliminary work we compare standard measurement of EDS with visual and automatic detection of SEMs, both performed on MSLT recordings. Methods: We compared sleep latency, obtained upon standard analysis of MSLT with visually and automatically detected SEM latency, in MSLT tests performed in a population of 20 subjects, (10 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) patients and 10 patients with normal MSLT). Results: There were no significant differences between SEMs latency and standard determined sleep latency both in OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Automatic and visual analysis of SEMs gave comparable results. Both SEMs latency and sleep latency were significantly shorter in OSAS patients than normal MSLT patients. Conclusion: SEMs can be easily detected automatically and represent an effective marker of sleepiness in those conditions usually characterised by sleep onset with NREM sleep. Their performance equals that of standard measurements of sleep onset in MSLT recordings at least for OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Our study is, however, still preliminary and needs confirmation on a larger number of patients and in other clinical conditions characterised by EDS.

AB - Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) adversely impacts daily activity and quality of life. Evaluation of EDS should be as easy and effective as possible. Multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) represents the standard in EDS evaluation. It is, however, a long and expensive test. Slow eye movements (SEMs) occurring at the wake-sleep transition could be an easy and reliable marker of sleepiness. We have developed an automatic method for the detection of SEMs. In the present preliminary work we compare standard measurement of EDS with visual and automatic detection of SEMs, both performed on MSLT recordings. Methods: We compared sleep latency, obtained upon standard analysis of MSLT with visually and automatically detected SEM latency, in MSLT tests performed in a population of 20 subjects, (10 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) patients and 10 patients with normal MSLT). Results: There were no significant differences between SEMs latency and standard determined sleep latency both in OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Automatic and visual analysis of SEMs gave comparable results. Both SEMs latency and sleep latency were significantly shorter in OSAS patients than normal MSLT patients. Conclusion: SEMs can be easily detected automatically and represent an effective marker of sleepiness in those conditions usually characterised by sleep onset with NREM sleep. Their performance equals that of standard measurements of sleep onset in MSLT recordings at least for OSAS and normal MSLT patients. Our study is, however, still preliminary and needs confirmation on a larger number of patients and in other clinical conditions characterised by EDS.

KW - Excessive daytime sleepiness

KW - Multiple sleep latency test

KW - Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

KW - Sleep

KW - Sleep onset

KW - Slow eye movements

KW - Somnolence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349213967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349213967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.07.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 18951841

AN - SCOPUS:67349213967

VL - 10

SP - 637

EP - 640

JO - Sleep Medicine

JF - Sleep Medicine

SN - 1389-9457

IS - 6

ER -