Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A meta-analysis (n > 50)

Domenico Dalessandri, Stefano Salgarello, Michela Dalessandri, Elena Lazzaroni, Mariagrazia Piancino, Corrado Paganelli, Carlo Maiorana, Franco Santoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to review the literature and evaluate the failure rates and factors that affect the stability and success of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) used as orthodontic anchorage. METHODS: Data were collected from electronic databases: MEDLINE database, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge. Four combinations of term were used as keywords: screw orthodontic failure, screw orthodontic success, implant orthodontic failure, and implant orthodontic success. The following selection criteria were used to select appropriate articles: articles on implants and screws used as orthodontic anchorage, data only from human subjects, studies published in English, studies with more than 50 implants/screws, and both prospective and retrospective clinical studies. RESULTS: The search provided 209 abstracts about TADs used as anchorage. After reading and applying the selection criteria, 26 articles were included in the study. The data obtained were divided into two topics: which factors affected TAD success and to what degree and in how many articles they were quoted. Clinical factors were divided into three main groups: patient-related, implant-related, and managementrelated factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although all articles included in this meta-analysis reported success rates of greater than 80 per cent, the factors determining success rates were inconsistent between the studies analysed and this made conclusions difficult.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-313
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A meta-analysis (n > 50)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this