Determinants of inappropriate setting allocation in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study in Reggio Emilia province

Paola Ballotari, Francesco Venturelli, Valeria Manicardi, Massimo Vicentini, Francesca Ferrari, Marina Greci, Mariarosa Maiorana, Paolo Giorgi Rossi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study aims to describe the distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by care plan and to highlight determinants of underuse and overuse of integrated care (IC). This cross-sectional study included all T2D patients resident in Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2015 based on the population-based diabetes registry. Eligibility for IC requires good glycaemic control, no rapid insulin, no kidney failure and no diabetes complications. We calculated the proportion of IC underuse and overuse and adjusted prevalence estimate using multivariate logistic regression. Determinants were age, sex, citizenship, district of residence and time since diagnosis. Of 29,776 patients, 15,364 (51.6%) were in diabetes clinic plan, 9851 (33.1%) in IC plan and 4561 (15.3%) not in any care plan (i.e., in Other group). There were 10,906 (36.6%) patients eligible for IC, of whom 1000 in Other group. When we adjusted for all covariates and restricted the analysis to patients included in care plans, the proportion of those eligible for IC plan but cared for in diabetes clinic plan (i.e. underuse of IC) was 28% (n = 3028/9906; 95%CI 27–29). Similarly, the proportion of those not eligible for IC but cared for in IC plan (i.e. overuse of IC) was 11% (n = 1720/11,896; 95%CI 10–11).The main determinant of both IC underuse and overuse was the district of residence. Foreign status was associated with underuse (37%; 95%CI 33–43), while old age (80 years) with both underuse (36%; 95%CI 0.33–0.38) and overuse (23%; 95%CI 22–25). The criterion for suspension of IC plan most frequently found was renal failure, followed by hospitalization for diabetes-related complications. Patients are more often allocated to more specialized settings than not. Healthcare provider-related factors are the main determinants of inappropriate setting allocation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0219965
JournalPLoS One
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emilia
patient care
Medical problems
noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
diabetes
Patient Care
Population
renal failure
Diabetes Complications
Renal Insufficiency
glycemic control
cross-sectional studies
health services
insulin
Health Personnel
Registries
Suspensions
Hospitalization
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Determinants of inappropriate setting allocation in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes : A population-based study in Reggio Emilia province. / Ballotari, Paola; Venturelli, Francesco; Manicardi, Valeria; Vicentini, Massimo; Ferrari, Francesca; Greci, Marina; Maiorana, Mariarosa; Rossi, Paolo Giorgi.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 14, No. 7, e0219965, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebbe79b6d7ee458980a031dc08582c6c,
title = "Determinants of inappropriate setting allocation in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study in Reggio Emilia province",
abstract = "The study aims to describe the distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by care plan and to highlight determinants of underuse and overuse of integrated care (IC). This cross-sectional study included all T2D patients resident in Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2015 based on the population-based diabetes registry. Eligibility for IC requires good glycaemic control, no rapid insulin, no kidney failure and no diabetes complications. We calculated the proportion of IC underuse and overuse and adjusted prevalence estimate using multivariate logistic regression. Determinants were age, sex, citizenship, district of residence and time since diagnosis. Of 29,776 patients, 15,364 (51.6{\%}) were in diabetes clinic plan, 9851 (33.1{\%}) in IC plan and 4561 (15.3{\%}) not in any care plan (i.e., in Other group). There were 10,906 (36.6{\%}) patients eligible for IC, of whom 1000 in Other group. When we adjusted for all covariates and restricted the analysis to patients included in care plans, the proportion of those eligible for IC plan but cared for in diabetes clinic plan (i.e. underuse of IC) was 28{\%} (n = 3028/9906; 95{\%}CI 27–29). Similarly, the proportion of those not eligible for IC but cared for in IC plan (i.e. overuse of IC) was 11{\%} (n = 1720/11,896; 95{\%}CI 10–11).The main determinant of both IC underuse and overuse was the district of residence. Foreign status was associated with underuse (37{\%}; 95{\%}CI 33–43), while old age (80 years) with both underuse (36{\%}; 95{\%}CI 0.33–0.38) and overuse (23{\%}; 95{\%}CI 22–25). The criterion for suspension of IC plan most frequently found was renal failure, followed by hospitalization for diabetes-related complications. Patients are more often allocated to more specialized settings than not. Healthcare provider-related factors are the main determinants of inappropriate setting allocation.",
author = "Paola Ballotari and Francesco Venturelli and Valeria Manicardi and Massimo Vicentini and Francesca Ferrari and Marina Greci and Mariarosa Maiorana and Rossi, {Paolo Giorgi}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0219965",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of inappropriate setting allocation in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes

T2 - A population-based study in Reggio Emilia province

AU - Ballotari, Paola

AU - Venturelli, Francesco

AU - Manicardi, Valeria

AU - Vicentini, Massimo

AU - Ferrari, Francesca

AU - Greci, Marina

AU - Maiorana, Mariarosa

AU - Rossi, Paolo Giorgi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The study aims to describe the distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by care plan and to highlight determinants of underuse and overuse of integrated care (IC). This cross-sectional study included all T2D patients resident in Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2015 based on the population-based diabetes registry. Eligibility for IC requires good glycaemic control, no rapid insulin, no kidney failure and no diabetes complications. We calculated the proportion of IC underuse and overuse and adjusted prevalence estimate using multivariate logistic regression. Determinants were age, sex, citizenship, district of residence and time since diagnosis. Of 29,776 patients, 15,364 (51.6%) were in diabetes clinic plan, 9851 (33.1%) in IC plan and 4561 (15.3%) not in any care plan (i.e., in Other group). There were 10,906 (36.6%) patients eligible for IC, of whom 1000 in Other group. When we adjusted for all covariates and restricted the analysis to patients included in care plans, the proportion of those eligible for IC plan but cared for in diabetes clinic plan (i.e. underuse of IC) was 28% (n = 3028/9906; 95%CI 27–29). Similarly, the proportion of those not eligible for IC but cared for in IC plan (i.e. overuse of IC) was 11% (n = 1720/11,896; 95%CI 10–11).The main determinant of both IC underuse and overuse was the district of residence. Foreign status was associated with underuse (37%; 95%CI 33–43), while old age (80 years) with both underuse (36%; 95%CI 0.33–0.38) and overuse (23%; 95%CI 22–25). The criterion for suspension of IC plan most frequently found was renal failure, followed by hospitalization for diabetes-related complications. Patients are more often allocated to more specialized settings than not. Healthcare provider-related factors are the main determinants of inappropriate setting allocation.

AB - The study aims to describe the distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by care plan and to highlight determinants of underuse and overuse of integrated care (IC). This cross-sectional study included all T2D patients resident in Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2015 based on the population-based diabetes registry. Eligibility for IC requires good glycaemic control, no rapid insulin, no kidney failure and no diabetes complications. We calculated the proportion of IC underuse and overuse and adjusted prevalence estimate using multivariate logistic regression. Determinants were age, sex, citizenship, district of residence and time since diagnosis. Of 29,776 patients, 15,364 (51.6%) were in diabetes clinic plan, 9851 (33.1%) in IC plan and 4561 (15.3%) not in any care plan (i.e., in Other group). There were 10,906 (36.6%) patients eligible for IC, of whom 1000 in Other group. When we adjusted for all covariates and restricted the analysis to patients included in care plans, the proportion of those eligible for IC plan but cared for in diabetes clinic plan (i.e. underuse of IC) was 28% (n = 3028/9906; 95%CI 27–29). Similarly, the proportion of those not eligible for IC but cared for in IC plan (i.e. overuse of IC) was 11% (n = 1720/11,896; 95%CI 10–11).The main determinant of both IC underuse and overuse was the district of residence. Foreign status was associated with underuse (37%; 95%CI 33–43), while old age (80 years) with both underuse (36%; 95%CI 0.33–0.38) and overuse (23%; 95%CI 22–25). The criterion for suspension of IC plan most frequently found was renal failure, followed by hospitalization for diabetes-related complications. Patients are more often allocated to more specialized settings than not. Healthcare provider-related factors are the main determinants of inappropriate setting allocation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069861493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069861493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219965

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219965

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069861493

VL - 14

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0219965

ER -