Development of a cardiopulmonary exercise prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in heart failure: The (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE) study

Marco Guazzi, Patrizia Boracchi, Ross Arena, Jonathan Myers, Marco Vicenzi, Mary Ann Peberdy, Daniel Bensimhon, Paul Chase, Giuseppe Reina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides powerful information on risk of death in heart failure (HF). We sought to define the relative and additive contribution of the 3 landmark (CPET) prognostic markers - peak oxygen consumption (VO2), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope, and exercise periodic breathing (EPB) - to the overall risk of cardiac death and to develop a prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in HF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 695 stable HF patients (average LVEF: 25 ± 8%) underwent a symptom-limited CPET maximum test after familiarization and were prospectively tracked for cardiac mortality. At multivariable Cox analysis EPB emerged as the strongest prognosticator. Using a statistical bootstrap technique (5000 data resamplings), point estimates, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Thirty-two configurations were adopted to classify patients into a given cell, according to EPB presence or absence and values of the 2 other covariates. Configurations without EPB and with VE/VCO2 slope ≤30 were not significantly different from 0 (reference value). Statistical power of configurations increased with higher VE/VCO2 slope and lower peak VO2. This prompted us to formulate a score including EPB as a discriminating variable, the (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE), which ranges between -1 and 1, with zero as reference configuration, that would help to optimize the prognostic accuracy of CPET-derived variables. The greatest PROBE score impact was provided by EPB, followed by VE/VCO 2 slope, whereas peak VO2 added minimal prognostic power. Conclusions: EPB with an elevated VE/VCO2 slope leads to the highest and most precise PROBE score, whereas no additional risk information emerges when EPB is present with a peak VO2 ≤10 mL O2· kg-1·min-1. PROBE score appears to provide a step forward for optimizing CPET use in HF prognostic definition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-805
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Breathing Exercises
Heart Failure
Exercise
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen Consumption
Ventilation
Reference Values
Confidence Intervals
Mortality

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary testing
  • heart failure
  • prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Development of a cardiopulmonary exercise prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in heart failure : The (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE) study. / Guazzi, Marco; Boracchi, Patrizia; Arena, Ross; Myers, Jonathan; Vicenzi, Marco; Peberdy, Mary Ann; Bensimhon, Daniel; Chase, Paul; Reina, Giuseppe.

In: Journal of Cardiac Failure, Vol. 16, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 799-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guazzi, Marco ; Boracchi, Patrizia ; Arena, Ross ; Myers, Jonathan ; Vicenzi, Marco ; Peberdy, Mary Ann ; Bensimhon, Daniel ; Chase, Paul ; Reina, Giuseppe. / Development of a cardiopulmonary exercise prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in heart failure : The (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE) study. In: Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 10. pp. 799-805.
@article{5a6e0bb1fa0a450092ec486fff06dc27,
title = "Development of a cardiopulmonary exercise prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in heart failure: The (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE) study",
abstract = "Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides powerful information on risk of death in heart failure (HF). We sought to define the relative and additive contribution of the 3 landmark (CPET) prognostic markers - peak oxygen consumption (VO2), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope, and exercise periodic breathing (EPB) - to the overall risk of cardiac death and to develop a prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in HF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 695 stable HF patients (average LVEF: 25 ± 8{\%}) underwent a symptom-limited CPET maximum test after familiarization and were prospectively tracked for cardiac mortality. At multivariable Cox analysis EPB emerged as the strongest prognosticator. Using a statistical bootstrap technique (5000 data resamplings), point estimates, and 95{\%} confidence intervals were obtained. Thirty-two configurations were adopted to classify patients into a given cell, according to EPB presence or absence and values of the 2 other covariates. Configurations without EPB and with VE/VCO2 slope ≤30 were not significantly different from 0 (reference value). Statistical power of configurations increased with higher VE/VCO2 slope and lower peak VO2. This prompted us to formulate a score including EPB as a discriminating variable, the (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE), which ranges between -1 and 1, with zero as reference configuration, that would help to optimize the prognostic accuracy of CPET-derived variables. The greatest PROBE score impact was provided by EPB, followed by VE/VCO 2 slope, whereas peak VO2 added minimal prognostic power. Conclusions: EPB with an elevated VE/VCO2 slope leads to the highest and most precise PROBE score, whereas no additional risk information emerges when EPB is present with a peak VO2 ≤10 mL O2· kg-1·min-1. PROBE score appears to provide a step forward for optimizing CPET use in HF prognostic definition.",
keywords = "Cardiopulmonary testing, heart failure, prognosis",
author = "Marco Guazzi and Patrizia Boracchi and Ross Arena and Jonathan Myers and Marco Vicenzi and Peberdy, {Mary Ann} and Daniel Bensimhon and Paul Chase and Giuseppe Reina",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "799--805",
journal = "Journal of Cardiac Failure",
issn = "1071-9164",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a cardiopulmonary exercise prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in heart failure

T2 - The (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE) study

AU - Guazzi, Marco

AU - Boracchi, Patrizia

AU - Arena, Ross

AU - Myers, Jonathan

AU - Vicenzi, Marco

AU - Peberdy, Mary Ann

AU - Bensimhon, Daniel

AU - Chase, Paul

AU - Reina, Giuseppe

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides powerful information on risk of death in heart failure (HF). We sought to define the relative and additive contribution of the 3 landmark (CPET) prognostic markers - peak oxygen consumption (VO2), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope, and exercise periodic breathing (EPB) - to the overall risk of cardiac death and to develop a prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in HF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 695 stable HF patients (average LVEF: 25 ± 8%) underwent a symptom-limited CPET maximum test after familiarization and were prospectively tracked for cardiac mortality. At multivariable Cox analysis EPB emerged as the strongest prognosticator. Using a statistical bootstrap technique (5000 data resamplings), point estimates, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Thirty-two configurations were adopted to classify patients into a given cell, according to EPB presence or absence and values of the 2 other covariates. Configurations without EPB and with VE/VCO2 slope ≤30 were not significantly different from 0 (reference value). Statistical power of configurations increased with higher VE/VCO2 slope and lower peak VO2. This prompted us to formulate a score including EPB as a discriminating variable, the (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE), which ranges between -1 and 1, with zero as reference configuration, that would help to optimize the prognostic accuracy of CPET-derived variables. The greatest PROBE score impact was provided by EPB, followed by VE/VCO 2 slope, whereas peak VO2 added minimal prognostic power. Conclusions: EPB with an elevated VE/VCO2 slope leads to the highest and most precise PROBE score, whereas no additional risk information emerges when EPB is present with a peak VO2 ≤10 mL O2· kg-1·min-1. PROBE score appears to provide a step forward for optimizing CPET use in HF prognostic definition.

AB - Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides powerful information on risk of death in heart failure (HF). We sought to define the relative and additive contribution of the 3 landmark (CPET) prognostic markers - peak oxygen consumption (VO2), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope, and exercise periodic breathing (EPB) - to the overall risk of cardiac death and to develop a prognostic score for optimizing risk stratification in HF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 695 stable HF patients (average LVEF: 25 ± 8%) underwent a symptom-limited CPET maximum test after familiarization and were prospectively tracked for cardiac mortality. At multivariable Cox analysis EPB emerged as the strongest prognosticator. Using a statistical bootstrap technique (5000 data resamplings), point estimates, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Thirty-two configurations were adopted to classify patients into a given cell, according to EPB presence or absence and values of the 2 other covariates. Configurations without EPB and with VE/VCO2 slope ≤30 were not significantly different from 0 (reference value). Statistical power of configurations increased with higher VE/VCO2 slope and lower peak VO2. This prompted us to formulate a score including EPB as a discriminating variable, the (P)e(R)i(O)dic (B)reathing during (E)xercise (PROBE), which ranges between -1 and 1, with zero as reference configuration, that would help to optimize the prognostic accuracy of CPET-derived variables. The greatest PROBE score impact was provided by EPB, followed by VE/VCO 2 slope, whereas peak VO2 added minimal prognostic power. Conclusions: EPB with an elevated VE/VCO2 slope leads to the highest and most precise PROBE score, whereas no additional risk information emerges when EPB is present with a peak VO2 ≤10 mL O2· kg-1·min-1. PROBE score appears to provide a step forward for optimizing CPET use in HF prognostic definition.

KW - Cardiopulmonary testing

KW - heart failure

KW - prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957781752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957781752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 20932461

AN - SCOPUS:77957781752

VL - 16

SP - 799

EP - 805

JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure

JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure

SN - 1071-9164

IS - 10

ER -