Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto project

Roberto Fiocca, Luca Mastracci, Robert Riddell, Kaiyo Takubo, Michael Vieth, Lisa Yerian, Prateek Sharma, Paula Fernström, Magnus Ruth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

No gold standard test exists for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Diagnostic difficulties are greatest when reflux symptoms occur without visible esophageal mucosal damage at conventional endoscopy. However, two thirds of such patients do have microscopic esophageal lesions. This study aimed to develop and standardize criteria for recognizing these microscopic esophageal lesions in GERD. Draft histologic criteria were developed and tested by an international group of 5 independent gastrointestinal pathologists using 167 biopsy specimens from GERD patients and healthy controls (phase I). Draft criteria were refined and reassessed using 250 photographs of biopsy specimens (phase II). Histologic lesions evaluated were basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, intraepithelial eosinophil, neutrophil and mononuclear cell number, necrosis/erosion, healed erosion, and dilated intercellular spaces. Interobserver agreement and κ values increased significantly from phase I to II. When tested in annotated photographs (phase II), mean pairwise agreements were 74%, 89%, 93%, 97%, 81%, 97%, 94%, and 74%, respectively. Mean pairwise κ estimates (±SD) were 0.49 (0.16), 0.81 (0.05), 0.87 (0.05), 0.84 (0.09), 0.60 (0.09), 0.90 (0.04), 0.73 (0.14), and 0.61 (0.08), respectively. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficients for basal cell layer thickness and papillary length increased from 0.38 and 0.56 to 0.69 and 0.95, respectively, when revised criteria were used. The draft criteria achieved promising levels of agreement when assessed independently by 5 pathologists. Further steps include evaluation of lesions without indicating the area to be assessed and exploring the correlation of microscopic esophagitis with symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-231
Number of pages9
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Esophagitis
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Consensus
Guidelines
Biopsy
Extracellular Space
Eosinophils
Endoscopy
Hyperplasia
Neutrophils
Necrosis
Cell Count
Acids
Recognition (Psychology)
Pathologists

Keywords

  • Consensus development
  • Esophageal histology
  • Esophagitis
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease : the Esohisto project. / Fiocca, Roberto; Mastracci, Luca; Riddell, Robert; Takubo, Kaiyo; Vieth, Michael; Yerian, Lisa; Sharma, Prateek; Fernström, Paula; Ruth, Magnus.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 41, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 223-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fiocca, Roberto ; Mastracci, Luca ; Riddell, Robert ; Takubo, Kaiyo ; Vieth, Michael ; Yerian, Lisa ; Sharma, Prateek ; Fernström, Paula ; Ruth, Magnus. / Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease : the Esohisto project. In: Human Pathology. 2010 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 223-231.
@article{4cdc230d1e0148f2bea0068a58c5dca5,
title = "Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto project",
abstract = "No gold standard test exists for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Diagnostic difficulties are greatest when reflux symptoms occur without visible esophageal mucosal damage at conventional endoscopy. However, two thirds of such patients do have microscopic esophageal lesions. This study aimed to develop and standardize criteria for recognizing these microscopic esophageal lesions in GERD. Draft histologic criteria were developed and tested by an international group of 5 independent gastrointestinal pathologists using 167 biopsy specimens from GERD patients and healthy controls (phase I). Draft criteria were refined and reassessed using 250 photographs of biopsy specimens (phase II). Histologic lesions evaluated were basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, intraepithelial eosinophil, neutrophil and mononuclear cell number, necrosis/erosion, healed erosion, and dilated intercellular spaces. Interobserver agreement and κ values increased significantly from phase I to II. When tested in annotated photographs (phase II), mean pairwise agreements were 74{\%}, 89{\%}, 93{\%}, 97{\%}, 81{\%}, 97{\%}, 94{\%}, and 74{\%}, respectively. Mean pairwise κ estimates (±SD) were 0.49 (0.16), 0.81 (0.05), 0.87 (0.05), 0.84 (0.09), 0.60 (0.09), 0.90 (0.04), 0.73 (0.14), and 0.61 (0.08), respectively. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficients for basal cell layer thickness and papillary length increased from 0.38 and 0.56 to 0.69 and 0.95, respectively, when revised criteria were used. The draft criteria achieved promising levels of agreement when assessed independently by 5 pathologists. Further steps include evaluation of lesions without indicating the area to be assessed and exploring the correlation of microscopic esophagitis with symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.",
keywords = "Consensus development, Esophageal histology, Esophagitis, Gastroesophageal reflux disease",
author = "Roberto Fiocca and Luca Mastracci and Robert Riddell and Kaiyo Takubo and Michael Vieth and Lisa Yerian and Prateek Sharma and Paula Fernstr{\"o}m and Magnus Ruth",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "223--231",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

T2 - the Esohisto project

AU - Fiocca, Roberto

AU - Mastracci, Luca

AU - Riddell, Robert

AU - Takubo, Kaiyo

AU - Vieth, Michael

AU - Yerian, Lisa

AU - Sharma, Prateek

AU - Fernström, Paula

AU - Ruth, Magnus

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - No gold standard test exists for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Diagnostic difficulties are greatest when reflux symptoms occur without visible esophageal mucosal damage at conventional endoscopy. However, two thirds of such patients do have microscopic esophageal lesions. This study aimed to develop and standardize criteria for recognizing these microscopic esophageal lesions in GERD. Draft histologic criteria were developed and tested by an international group of 5 independent gastrointestinal pathologists using 167 biopsy specimens from GERD patients and healthy controls (phase I). Draft criteria were refined and reassessed using 250 photographs of biopsy specimens (phase II). Histologic lesions evaluated were basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, intraepithelial eosinophil, neutrophil and mononuclear cell number, necrosis/erosion, healed erosion, and dilated intercellular spaces. Interobserver agreement and κ values increased significantly from phase I to II. When tested in annotated photographs (phase II), mean pairwise agreements were 74%, 89%, 93%, 97%, 81%, 97%, 94%, and 74%, respectively. Mean pairwise κ estimates (±SD) were 0.49 (0.16), 0.81 (0.05), 0.87 (0.05), 0.84 (0.09), 0.60 (0.09), 0.90 (0.04), 0.73 (0.14), and 0.61 (0.08), respectively. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficients for basal cell layer thickness and papillary length increased from 0.38 and 0.56 to 0.69 and 0.95, respectively, when revised criteria were used. The draft criteria achieved promising levels of agreement when assessed independently by 5 pathologists. Further steps include evaluation of lesions without indicating the area to be assessed and exploring the correlation of microscopic esophagitis with symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.

AB - No gold standard test exists for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Diagnostic difficulties are greatest when reflux symptoms occur without visible esophageal mucosal damage at conventional endoscopy. However, two thirds of such patients do have microscopic esophageal lesions. This study aimed to develop and standardize criteria for recognizing these microscopic esophageal lesions in GERD. Draft histologic criteria were developed and tested by an international group of 5 independent gastrointestinal pathologists using 167 biopsy specimens from GERD patients and healthy controls (phase I). Draft criteria were refined and reassessed using 250 photographs of biopsy specimens (phase II). Histologic lesions evaluated were basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, intraepithelial eosinophil, neutrophil and mononuclear cell number, necrosis/erosion, healed erosion, and dilated intercellular spaces. Interobserver agreement and κ values increased significantly from phase I to II. When tested in annotated photographs (phase II), mean pairwise agreements were 74%, 89%, 93%, 97%, 81%, 97%, 94%, and 74%, respectively. Mean pairwise κ estimates (±SD) were 0.49 (0.16), 0.81 (0.05), 0.87 (0.05), 0.84 (0.09), 0.60 (0.09), 0.90 (0.04), 0.73 (0.14), and 0.61 (0.08), respectively. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficients for basal cell layer thickness and papillary length increased from 0.38 and 0.56 to 0.69 and 0.95, respectively, when revised criteria were used. The draft criteria achieved promising levels of agreement when assessed independently by 5 pathologists. Further steps include evaluation of lesions without indicating the area to be assessed and exploring the correlation of microscopic esophagitis with symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.

KW - Consensus development

KW - Esophageal histology

KW - Esophagitis

KW - Gastroesophageal reflux disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73749085273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73749085273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 19800099

AN - SCOPUS:73749085273

VL - 41

SP - 223

EP - 231

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 2

ER -