Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter

Andrea Salonia, Carmen Maccagnano, Arianna Lesma, Richard Naspro, Nazareno Suardi, Giorgio Guazzoni, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Updated review about topographic anatomy, clinical and radiologic diagnosis, and management of the circumcaval ureter. Methods: We used Ovid and PubMed (updated January 2006) to conduct a literature electronic search on MEDLINE which included peer-reviewed articles. Moreover, we analysed previous publications regarding both "retrocaval" and "circumcaval" ureter. Results: Circumcaval ureter predominantly involves the right ureter; its exact prevalence is still unknown. The anomaly occurs 2.8 times more commonly in males than females clinically as well. Although the lesion is congenital, symptoms usually present in the third to fourth decade of life; the patients mostly present with right flank pain and discomfort. Intravenous urogram and retrograde urography were commonly used to diagnose a circumcaval ureter. A spiral computed tomography scan and, more recently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, have been suggested to differentially diagnose a circumcaval ureter as methods of choice. The open ureteroureterostomy remained the gold standard surgical approach to treat the circumcaval ureter for many years; however, minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures have almost replaced open surgery. Conclusions: The circumcaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly usually associated with upper urinary tract hydronephrosis. Spiral computed tomography scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging have been recently considered the tool of choice for the diagnosis of inferior vena caval abnormalities. Comparisons among historical reports regarding open surgery and laparoscopic transposition and reanastomosis of a circumcaval ureter have clearly shown the advantages of minimally invasive approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-462
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Urology, Supplements
Volume5
Issue number5 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Retrocaval Ureter
Therapeutics
Urography
Spiral Computed Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Flank Pain
Venae Cavae
Hydronephrosis
Ureter
Urinary Tract
PubMed
MEDLINE
Laparoscopy
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Anomalies
  • Circumcaval
  • Diagnosis
  • Imaging
  • Retrocaval
  • Treatment
  • Ureter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Salonia, A., Maccagnano, C., Lesma, A., Naspro, R., Suardi, N., Guazzoni, G., ... Rigatti, P. (2006). Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter. European Urology, Supplements, 5(5 SPEC. ISS.), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.009

Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter. / Salonia, Andrea; Maccagnano, Carmen; Lesma, Arianna; Naspro, Richard; Suardi, Nazareno; Guazzoni, Giorgio; Montorsi, Francesco; Rigatti, Patrizio.

In: European Urology, Supplements, Vol. 5, No. 5 SPEC. ISS., 04.2006, p. 449-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salonia, A, Maccagnano, C, Lesma, A, Naspro, R, Suardi, N, Guazzoni, G, Montorsi, F & Rigatti, P 2006, 'Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter', European Urology, Supplements, vol. 5, no. 5 SPEC. ISS., pp. 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.009
Salonia, Andrea ; Maccagnano, Carmen ; Lesma, Arianna ; Naspro, Richard ; Suardi, Nazareno ; Guazzoni, Giorgio ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Rigatti, Patrizio. / Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter. In: European Urology, Supplements. 2006 ; Vol. 5, No. 5 SPEC. ISS. pp. 449-462.
@article{eae770fc3a4a44c6a8de8aceec27a636,
title = "Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter",
abstract = "Objectives: Updated review about topographic anatomy, clinical and radiologic diagnosis, and management of the circumcaval ureter. Methods: We used Ovid and PubMed (updated January 2006) to conduct a literature electronic search on MEDLINE which included peer-reviewed articles. Moreover, we analysed previous publications regarding both {"}retrocaval{"} and {"}circumcaval{"} ureter. Results: Circumcaval ureter predominantly involves the right ureter; its exact prevalence is still unknown. The anomaly occurs 2.8 times more commonly in males than females clinically as well. Although the lesion is congenital, symptoms usually present in the third to fourth decade of life; the patients mostly present with right flank pain and discomfort. Intravenous urogram and retrograde urography were commonly used to diagnose a circumcaval ureter. A spiral computed tomography scan and, more recently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, have been suggested to differentially diagnose a circumcaval ureter as methods of choice. The open ureteroureterostomy remained the gold standard surgical approach to treat the circumcaval ureter for many years; however, minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures have almost replaced open surgery. Conclusions: The circumcaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly usually associated with upper urinary tract hydronephrosis. Spiral computed tomography scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging have been recently considered the tool of choice for the diagnosis of inferior vena caval abnormalities. Comparisons among historical reports regarding open surgery and laparoscopic transposition and reanastomosis of a circumcaval ureter have clearly shown the advantages of minimally invasive approaches.",
keywords = "Anatomy, Anomalies, Circumcaval, Diagnosis, Imaging, Retrocaval, Treatment, Ureter",
author = "Andrea Salonia and Carmen Maccagnano and Arianna Lesma and Richard Naspro and Nazareno Suardi and Giorgio Guazzoni and Francesco Montorsi and Patrizio Rigatti",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.009",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "449--462",
journal = "European Urology, Supplements",
issn = "1569-9056",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis and treatment of the circumcaval ureter

AU - Salonia, Andrea

AU - Maccagnano, Carmen

AU - Lesma, Arianna

AU - Naspro, Richard

AU - Suardi, Nazareno

AU - Guazzoni, Giorgio

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Rigatti, Patrizio

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Objectives: Updated review about topographic anatomy, clinical and radiologic diagnosis, and management of the circumcaval ureter. Methods: We used Ovid and PubMed (updated January 2006) to conduct a literature electronic search on MEDLINE which included peer-reviewed articles. Moreover, we analysed previous publications regarding both "retrocaval" and "circumcaval" ureter. Results: Circumcaval ureter predominantly involves the right ureter; its exact prevalence is still unknown. The anomaly occurs 2.8 times more commonly in males than females clinically as well. Although the lesion is congenital, symptoms usually present in the third to fourth decade of life; the patients mostly present with right flank pain and discomfort. Intravenous urogram and retrograde urography were commonly used to diagnose a circumcaval ureter. A spiral computed tomography scan and, more recently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, have been suggested to differentially diagnose a circumcaval ureter as methods of choice. The open ureteroureterostomy remained the gold standard surgical approach to treat the circumcaval ureter for many years; however, minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures have almost replaced open surgery. Conclusions: The circumcaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly usually associated with upper urinary tract hydronephrosis. Spiral computed tomography scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging have been recently considered the tool of choice for the diagnosis of inferior vena caval abnormalities. Comparisons among historical reports regarding open surgery and laparoscopic transposition and reanastomosis of a circumcaval ureter have clearly shown the advantages of minimally invasive approaches.

AB - Objectives: Updated review about topographic anatomy, clinical and radiologic diagnosis, and management of the circumcaval ureter. Methods: We used Ovid and PubMed (updated January 2006) to conduct a literature electronic search on MEDLINE which included peer-reviewed articles. Moreover, we analysed previous publications regarding both "retrocaval" and "circumcaval" ureter. Results: Circumcaval ureter predominantly involves the right ureter; its exact prevalence is still unknown. The anomaly occurs 2.8 times more commonly in males than females clinically as well. Although the lesion is congenital, symptoms usually present in the third to fourth decade of life; the patients mostly present with right flank pain and discomfort. Intravenous urogram and retrograde urography were commonly used to diagnose a circumcaval ureter. A spiral computed tomography scan and, more recently, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, have been suggested to differentially diagnose a circumcaval ureter as methods of choice. The open ureteroureterostomy remained the gold standard surgical approach to treat the circumcaval ureter for many years; however, minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures have almost replaced open surgery. Conclusions: The circumcaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly usually associated with upper urinary tract hydronephrosis. Spiral computed tomography scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging have been recently considered the tool of choice for the diagnosis of inferior vena caval abnormalities. Comparisons among historical reports regarding open surgery and laparoscopic transposition and reanastomosis of a circumcaval ureter have clearly shown the advantages of minimally invasive approaches.

KW - Anatomy

KW - Anomalies

KW - Circumcaval

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Imaging

KW - Retrocaval

KW - Treatment

KW - Ureter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644820097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644820097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.009

DO - 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.009

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 449

EP - 462

JO - European Urology, Supplements

JF - European Urology, Supplements

SN - 1569-9056

IS - 5 SPEC. ISS.

ER -