Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island

O. Figueroa-Silva, E. Cinotti, T. de Almeida Silva, E. Moscarella, A. Lallas, S. Ciardo, G. Argenziano, G. Pellacani, S. Piana, C. Longo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Dermoscopic island (DI) is a dermoscopic clue for the diagnosis of thin melanoma (MM). However, its positive predictive value is about 50% and several naevi with DI are unnecessarily excised. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a second level non-invasive imaging tool that increases diagnostic accuracy for MM. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic RCM features of pigmented lesions typified by the presence of DI and calculate RCM diagnostic accuracy for MM diagnosis. Methods: All lesions with DI were retrieved from a database of 1964 cases. RCM diagnoses were given without being aware of the histopathological diagnoses. The number of MMs among lesions presenting with DI and the sensitivity and specificity of RCM for MM were assessed. The frequencies of dermoscopic and RCM features were calculated to evaluate significant differences in naevi and MMs showing DI (Chi-square test). Independently significant RCM criteria for MM were identified by discriminant analysis. Results: Sixty-three (3.2%) out of 1964 lesions presented DI. Among them, 30.2% were in situ MMs and 12.7% invasive MMs. Sensitivity and specificity of RCM for the diagnosis of MM in case of DI was 88.9%. Pagetoid cells (Wilks' lambda.804, P < 0.001) and atypical cells at dermo-epidermal junction (Wilks' lambda.762, P < 0.001) were identified to differentiate MM from naevi. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that DI could be a sign of early MMs and underlined that RCM could be a good tool to discriminate MMs and naevi in the presence of DI because it can identify the presence of cytological atypia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1594-1598
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Islands
Confocal Microscopy
Melanoma
Nevus
Nevi and Melanomas
Sensitivity and Specificity
Discriminant Analysis
Chi-Square Distribution
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island. / Figueroa-Silva, O.; Cinotti, E.; de Almeida Silva, T.; Moscarella, E.; Lallas, A.; Ciardo, S.; Argenziano, G.; Pellacani, G.; Piana, S.; Longo, C.

In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1594-1598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Figueroa-Silva, O, Cinotti, E, de Almeida Silva, T, Moscarella, E, Lallas, A, Ciardo, S, Argenziano, G, Pellacani, G, Piana, S & Longo, C 2016, 'Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island', Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1594-1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13632
Figueroa-Silva, O. ; Cinotti, E. ; de Almeida Silva, T. ; Moscarella, E. ; Lallas, A. ; Ciardo, S. ; Argenziano, G. ; Pellacani, G. ; Piana, S. ; Longo, C. / Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island. In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 9. pp. 1594-1598.
@article{91901fa82bf0450b96d34c6585d6a55a,
title = "Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island",
abstract = "Introduction: Dermoscopic island (DI) is a dermoscopic clue for the diagnosis of thin melanoma (MM). However, its positive predictive value is about 50{\%} and several naevi with DI are unnecessarily excised. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a second level non-invasive imaging tool that increases diagnostic accuracy for MM. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic RCM features of pigmented lesions typified by the presence of DI and calculate RCM diagnostic accuracy for MM diagnosis. Methods: All lesions with DI were retrieved from a database of 1964 cases. RCM diagnoses were given without being aware of the histopathological diagnoses. The number of MMs among lesions presenting with DI and the sensitivity and specificity of RCM for MM were assessed. The frequencies of dermoscopic and RCM features were calculated to evaluate significant differences in naevi and MMs showing DI (Chi-square test). Independently significant RCM criteria for MM were identified by discriminant analysis. Results: Sixty-three (3.2{\%}) out of 1964 lesions presented DI. Among them, 30.2{\%} were in situ MMs and 12.7{\%} invasive MMs. Sensitivity and specificity of RCM for the diagnosis of MM in case of DI was 88.9{\%}. Pagetoid cells (Wilks' lambda.804, P < 0.001) and atypical cells at dermo-epidermal junction (Wilks' lambda.762, P < 0.001) were identified to differentiate MM from naevi. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that DI could be a sign of early MMs and underlined that RCM could be a good tool to discriminate MMs and naevi in the presence of DI because it can identify the presence of cytological atypia.",
author = "O. Figueroa-Silva and E. Cinotti and {de Almeida Silva}, T. and E. Moscarella and A. Lallas and S. Ciardo and G. Argenziano and G. Pellacani and S. Piana and C. Longo",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jdv.13632",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1594--1598",
journal = "Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology",
issn = "0926-9959",
publisher = "wiley",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for lesions typified by dermoscopic island

AU - Figueroa-Silva, O.

AU - Cinotti, E.

AU - de Almeida Silva, T.

AU - Moscarella, E.

AU - Lallas, A.

AU - Ciardo, S.

AU - Argenziano, G.

AU - Pellacani, G.

AU - Piana, S.

AU - Longo, C.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Introduction: Dermoscopic island (DI) is a dermoscopic clue for the diagnosis of thin melanoma (MM). However, its positive predictive value is about 50% and several naevi with DI are unnecessarily excised. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a second level non-invasive imaging tool that increases diagnostic accuracy for MM. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic RCM features of pigmented lesions typified by the presence of DI and calculate RCM diagnostic accuracy for MM diagnosis. Methods: All lesions with DI were retrieved from a database of 1964 cases. RCM diagnoses were given without being aware of the histopathological diagnoses. The number of MMs among lesions presenting with DI and the sensitivity and specificity of RCM for MM were assessed. The frequencies of dermoscopic and RCM features were calculated to evaluate significant differences in naevi and MMs showing DI (Chi-square test). Independently significant RCM criteria for MM were identified by discriminant analysis. Results: Sixty-three (3.2%) out of 1964 lesions presented DI. Among them, 30.2% were in situ MMs and 12.7% invasive MMs. Sensitivity and specificity of RCM for the diagnosis of MM in case of DI was 88.9%. Pagetoid cells (Wilks' lambda.804, P < 0.001) and atypical cells at dermo-epidermal junction (Wilks' lambda.762, P < 0.001) were identified to differentiate MM from naevi. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that DI could be a sign of early MMs and underlined that RCM could be a good tool to discriminate MMs and naevi in the presence of DI because it can identify the presence of cytological atypia.

AB - Introduction: Dermoscopic island (DI) is a dermoscopic clue for the diagnosis of thin melanoma (MM). However, its positive predictive value is about 50% and several naevi with DI are unnecessarily excised. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a second level non-invasive imaging tool that increases diagnostic accuracy for MM. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic RCM features of pigmented lesions typified by the presence of DI and calculate RCM diagnostic accuracy for MM diagnosis. Methods: All lesions with DI were retrieved from a database of 1964 cases. RCM diagnoses were given without being aware of the histopathological diagnoses. The number of MMs among lesions presenting with DI and the sensitivity and specificity of RCM for MM were assessed. The frequencies of dermoscopic and RCM features were calculated to evaluate significant differences in naevi and MMs showing DI (Chi-square test). Independently significant RCM criteria for MM were identified by discriminant analysis. Results: Sixty-three (3.2%) out of 1964 lesions presented DI. Among them, 30.2% were in situ MMs and 12.7% invasive MMs. Sensitivity and specificity of RCM for the diagnosis of MM in case of DI was 88.9%. Pagetoid cells (Wilks' lambda.804, P < 0.001) and atypical cells at dermo-epidermal junction (Wilks' lambda.762, P < 0.001) were identified to differentiate MM from naevi. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that DI could be a sign of early MMs and underlined that RCM could be a good tool to discriminate MMs and naevi in the presence of DI because it can identify the presence of cytological atypia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983082219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983082219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jdv.13632

DO - 10.1111/jdv.13632

M3 - Article

C2 - 27109574

AN - SCOPUS:84983082219

VL - 30

SP - 1594

EP - 1598

JO - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

JF - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

SN - 0926-9959

IS - 9

ER -