TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic and interventional radiology management of ureteral iatrogenic leakage after gynecologic surgery
AU - Fontana, Federico
AU - Piacentino, Filippo
AU - Ossola, Christian
AU - Casarin, Jvan
AU - Coppola, Andrea
AU - Cromi, Antonella
AU - Ierardi, Anna Maria
AU - Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
AU - Basile, Antonio
AU - Deho, Federico
AU - Ghezzi, Fabio
AU - Carcano, Giulio
AU - Venturini, Massimo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: To report safety and efficacy of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of gynecologic iatrogenic urinary leaks. Methods: A retrospective analysis of iatrogenic ureteral lesions treated between November 2009 to April 2019 was performed. Under ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy guidance, an attempt to place a ureteral stent and nephrostomy was carried out in the same session using an anterograde percutaneous approach. At the end of any procedure, a fluoroscopic control and a cone-beam CT scan (CBCT) were performed to check the correct placement and functioning of the nephrostomy and DJ stent. In cases of difficult ureteral stent placement via the single anterograde approach, the collaboration of urologists was requested to perform a rendezvous technique, combined with the retrograde approach. Results: DJ stent placement was achieved using the anterograde approach in 12/15 (80.0%) patients and using the retrograde approach in 3/15 cases (20.0%). Moreover, in 3/15 (20.0%) patients, surgical treatment was needed: in one case because of the persistence of ureteral stenosis at 6 months, and in the other two cases due to ureter-vaginal fistula. No major complications were recorded; overall, minor complications occurred in 4/8 patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of iatrogenic ureteral lesions after gynecological surgery is a safe and effective option.
AB - Objective: To report safety and efficacy of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of gynecologic iatrogenic urinary leaks. Methods: A retrospective analysis of iatrogenic ureteral lesions treated between November 2009 to April 2019 was performed. Under ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy guidance, an attempt to place a ureteral stent and nephrostomy was carried out in the same session using an anterograde percutaneous approach. At the end of any procedure, a fluoroscopic control and a cone-beam CT scan (CBCT) were performed to check the correct placement and functioning of the nephrostomy and DJ stent. In cases of difficult ureteral stent placement via the single anterograde approach, the collaboration of urologists was requested to perform a rendezvous technique, combined with the retrograde approach. Results: DJ stent placement was achieved using the anterograde approach in 12/15 (80.0%) patients and using the retrograde approach in 3/15 cases (20.0%). Moreover, in 3/15 (20.0%) patients, surgical treatment was needed: in one case because of the persistence of ureteral stenosis at 6 months, and in the other two cases due to ureter-vaginal fistula. No major complications were recorded; overall, minor complications occurred in 4/8 patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of iatrogenic ureteral lesions after gynecological surgery is a safe and effective option.
KW - Iatrogenic ureteral injuries
KW - Interventional uroradiology
KW - Ureteral leakage
KW - Urinary leak diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106531326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106531326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics11050750
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics11050750
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106531326
VL - 11
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
SN - 2075-4418
IS - 5
M1 - 750
ER -