Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories

B. Johnsen, A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen, S. Vingtoft, P. Fawcett, R. Liguori, W. Nix, G. Otte, J. Proença, I. Schofield, G. Sieben, M. Veloso, A. Vila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to analyse epidemiological and methodological differences in referral pattern, examination techniques and distribution of diagnoses among different European EMG laboratories. Seven European EMG laboratories filled in questionnaires and sampled 700 cases retrospectively. The use of needle or surface electrodes for nerve studies and the selection of quantitative techniques for muscle studies considerable variation. The pattern of referral varied with respect to the type of referral source and the neurological expertise of the referring physician. The proportion of patients without any neurophysiological abnormality ranged from 16 to 33%. The 3 most common diagnostic groups were mononeuropathies, polyneuropathies and radiculopathies although a great inter-laboratory variation was found. The proportion of patients with multiple diagnoses varied from 0 to 23% and most of these diagnoses were from a few known combinations. The presence of an inter-laboratory variation suggests that the quality of the EMG examination may be improved by focussing on the use of techniques, strategies and diagnostic criteria.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-158
Number of pages4
JournalElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Mononeuropathies
Radiculopathy
Polyneuropathies
Needles
Electrodes
Physicians
Muscles
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • Epidemiology
  • Examination techniques
  • Interlaboratory variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories. / Johnsen, B.; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A.; Vingtoft, S.; Fawcett, P.; Liguori, R.; Nix, W.; Otte, G.; Proença, J.; Schofield, I.; Sieben, G.; Veloso, M.; Vila, A.

In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials, Vol. 93, No. 2, 1994, p. 155-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnsen, B, Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A, Vingtoft, S, Fawcett, P, Liguori, R, Nix, W, Otte, G, Proença, J, Schofield, I, Sieben, G, Veloso, M & Vila, A 1994, 'Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories', Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)90079-5
Johnsen, B. ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A. ; Vingtoft, S. ; Fawcett, P. ; Liguori, R. ; Nix, W. ; Otte, G. ; Proença, J. ; Schofield, I. ; Sieben, G. ; Veloso, M. ; Vila, A. / Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials. 1994 ; Vol. 93, No. 2. pp. 155-158.
@article{56bc104339ae42579086b9afb3c18cde,
title = "Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to analyse epidemiological and methodological differences in referral pattern, examination techniques and distribution of diagnoses among different European EMG laboratories. Seven European EMG laboratories filled in questionnaires and sampled 700 cases retrospectively. The use of needle or surface electrodes for nerve studies and the selection of quantitative techniques for muscle studies considerable variation. The pattern of referral varied with respect to the type of referral source and the neurological expertise of the referring physician. The proportion of patients without any neurophysiological abnormality ranged from 16 to 33{\%}. The 3 most common diagnostic groups were mononeuropathies, polyneuropathies and radiculopathies although a great inter-laboratory variation was found. The proportion of patients with multiple diagnoses varied from 0 to 23{\%} and most of these diagnoses were from a few known combinations. The presence of an inter-laboratory variation suggests that the quality of the EMG examination may be improved by focussing on the use of techniques, strategies and diagnostic criteria.",
keywords = "Electromyography, Epidemiology, Examination techniques, Interlaboratory variation",
author = "B. Johnsen and A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen and S. Vingtoft and P. Fawcett and R. Liguori and W. Nix and G. Otte and J. Proen{\cc}a and I. Schofield and G. Sieben and M. Veloso and A. Vila",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0168-5597(94)90079-5",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "155--158",
journal = "Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials",
issn = "0168-5597",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the handling of the EMG examination at seven European laboratories

AU - Johnsen, B.

AU - Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A.

AU - Vingtoft, S.

AU - Fawcett, P.

AU - Liguori, R.

AU - Nix, W.

AU - Otte, G.

AU - Proença, J.

AU - Schofield, I.

AU - Sieben, G.

AU - Veloso, M.

AU - Vila, A.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This study was undertaken to analyse epidemiological and methodological differences in referral pattern, examination techniques and distribution of diagnoses among different European EMG laboratories. Seven European EMG laboratories filled in questionnaires and sampled 700 cases retrospectively. The use of needle or surface electrodes for nerve studies and the selection of quantitative techniques for muscle studies considerable variation. The pattern of referral varied with respect to the type of referral source and the neurological expertise of the referring physician. The proportion of patients without any neurophysiological abnormality ranged from 16 to 33%. The 3 most common diagnostic groups were mononeuropathies, polyneuropathies and radiculopathies although a great inter-laboratory variation was found. The proportion of patients with multiple diagnoses varied from 0 to 23% and most of these diagnoses were from a few known combinations. The presence of an inter-laboratory variation suggests that the quality of the EMG examination may be improved by focussing on the use of techniques, strategies and diagnostic criteria.

AB - This study was undertaken to analyse epidemiological and methodological differences in referral pattern, examination techniques and distribution of diagnoses among different European EMG laboratories. Seven European EMG laboratories filled in questionnaires and sampled 700 cases retrospectively. The use of needle or surface electrodes for nerve studies and the selection of quantitative techniques for muscle studies considerable variation. The pattern of referral varied with respect to the type of referral source and the neurological expertise of the referring physician. The proportion of patients without any neurophysiological abnormality ranged from 16 to 33%. The 3 most common diagnostic groups were mononeuropathies, polyneuropathies and radiculopathies although a great inter-laboratory variation was found. The proportion of patients with multiple diagnoses varied from 0 to 23% and most of these diagnoses were from a few known combinations. The presence of an inter-laboratory variation suggests that the quality of the EMG examination may be improved by focussing on the use of techniques, strategies and diagnostic criteria.

KW - Electromyography

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Examination techniques

KW - Interlaboratory variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028216241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028216241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90079-5

DO - 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90079-5

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 155

EP - 158

JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

SN - 0168-5597

IS - 2

ER -