Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors

M. Aglietta, W. Piacibello, A. Stacchini, F. Sanavio, A. Novarino, G. Grazia, R. Miniero, G. Neretto, F. Gavosto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A study of the in vitro growth model of human granulo-monopoietic precursors (CFU-GM) before and after cryopreservation using both leukocyte feeder layers and GCT conditioned medium as the source of colony stimulating activity (CSA) is reported. The number of colonies produced with fresh cells was linearly related to the amount of marrow seeded with both CSA sources, whereas after cryopreservation this was true with feeder layers, and with GCT only at relatively high cell concentrations. This might indicate the production of granulopoietic stimulators on the part of a second population that is at least partly resistant to freezing. It seems more likely, however, that these results depend mainly on a sublethal damage to CFU-GM induced by freezing, thus making the cells hyporesponsive to some forms of CSA, such as those contained in GCT conditioned medium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-490
Number of pages5
JournalCryobiology
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Feeder Cells
Conditioned Culture Medium
Freezing
Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor Cells
Cryopreservation
cryopreservation
freezing
Growth
cells
growth models
in vitro studies
leukocytes
Leukocytes
Bone Marrow
Population
In Vitro Techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Aglietta, M., Piacibello, W., Stacchini, A., Sanavio, F., Novarino, A., Grazia, G., ... Gavosto, F. (1984). Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors. Cryobiology, 21(5), 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(84)90046-4

Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors. / Aglietta, M.; Piacibello, W.; Stacchini, A.; Sanavio, F.; Novarino, A.; Grazia, G.; Miniero, R.; Neretto, G.; Gavosto, F.

In: Cryobiology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1984, p. 486-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aglietta, M, Piacibello, W, Stacchini, A, Sanavio, F, Novarino, A, Grazia, G, Miniero, R, Neretto, G & Gavosto, F 1984, 'Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors', Cryobiology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(84)90046-4
Aglietta, M. ; Piacibello, W. ; Stacchini, A. ; Sanavio, F. ; Novarino, A. ; Grazia, G. ; Miniero, R. ; Neretto, G. ; Gavosto, F. / Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors. In: Cryobiology. 1984 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 486-490.
@article{395a0a2217fb48bab27e2ce0832dc77a,
title = "Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors",
abstract = "A study of the in vitro growth model of human granulo-monopoietic precursors (CFU-GM) before and after cryopreservation using both leukocyte feeder layers and GCT conditioned medium as the source of colony stimulating activity (CSA) is reported. The number of colonies produced with fresh cells was linearly related to the amount of marrow seeded with both CSA sources, whereas after cryopreservation this was true with feeder layers, and with GCT only at relatively high cell concentrations. This might indicate the production of granulopoietic stimulators on the part of a second population that is at least partly resistant to freezing. It seems more likely, however, that these results depend mainly on a sublethal damage to CFU-GM induced by freezing, thus making the cells hyporesponsive to some forms of CSA, such as those contained in GCT conditioned medium.",
author = "M. Aglietta and W. Piacibello and A. Stacchini and F. Sanavio and A. Novarino and G. Grazia and R. Miniero and G. Neretto and F. Gavosto",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0011-2240(84)90046-4",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "486--490",
journal = "Cryobiology",
issn = "0011-2240",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the in vitro growth pattern of fresh and cryopreserved granulo-monopoietic precursors

AU - Aglietta, M.

AU - Piacibello, W.

AU - Stacchini, A.

AU - Sanavio, F.

AU - Novarino, A.

AU - Grazia, G.

AU - Miniero, R.

AU - Neretto, G.

AU - Gavosto, F.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - A study of the in vitro growth model of human granulo-monopoietic precursors (CFU-GM) before and after cryopreservation using both leukocyte feeder layers and GCT conditioned medium as the source of colony stimulating activity (CSA) is reported. The number of colonies produced with fresh cells was linearly related to the amount of marrow seeded with both CSA sources, whereas after cryopreservation this was true with feeder layers, and with GCT only at relatively high cell concentrations. This might indicate the production of granulopoietic stimulators on the part of a second population that is at least partly resistant to freezing. It seems more likely, however, that these results depend mainly on a sublethal damage to CFU-GM induced by freezing, thus making the cells hyporesponsive to some forms of CSA, such as those contained in GCT conditioned medium.

AB - A study of the in vitro growth model of human granulo-monopoietic precursors (CFU-GM) before and after cryopreservation using both leukocyte feeder layers and GCT conditioned medium as the source of colony stimulating activity (CSA) is reported. The number of colonies produced with fresh cells was linearly related to the amount of marrow seeded with both CSA sources, whereas after cryopreservation this was true with feeder layers, and with GCT only at relatively high cell concentrations. This might indicate the production of granulopoietic stimulators on the part of a second population that is at least partly resistant to freezing. It seems more likely, however, that these results depend mainly on a sublethal damage to CFU-GM induced by freezing, thus making the cells hyporesponsive to some forms of CSA, such as those contained in GCT conditioned medium.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021674661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021674661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0011-2240(84)90046-4

DO - 10.1016/0011-2240(84)90046-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 6499495

AN - SCOPUS:0021674661

VL - 21

SP - 486

EP - 490

JO - Cryobiology

JF - Cryobiology

SN - 0011-2240

IS - 5

ER -