Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain

Valentina Bianco, Francesco Di Russo, Rinaldo Livio Perri, Marika Berchicci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Practicing sport at top level requires excellent physical and cognitive skills. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether specific sport practice may affect the preparation-perception-action stages of processing during a visuo-motor task requiring perceptual discrimination and fast response. We recruited 39 participants (two groups of professional fencers and boxers, and a control group; N=13 for each group) and measured behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) while performing a go/no-go task. Results revealed that athletes were faster than controls, while fencers were more accurate than boxers. ERP analysis revealed that motor preparation, indexed by the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), was increased in athletes than controls, whereas the top-down attentional control, reflected by the prefrontal negativity (pN) component, was enhanced only in fencers when compared to controls. Most of the post-stimulus ERPs i.e. the N1, the N2, the P3, and the pP2, were enhanced in fencers. Combat sports require fast action execution, but the preparatory brain activity might differ according to the specific practice required by each discipline. Boxers might afford to commit more errors (as reflected by high commission error (CE) rate and by a small pN amplitude), while fencers have to be as much fast and accurate as possible (thanks to an enhanced pN amplitude). Although the possible influence of repetitive head blows on cerebral activity cannot be excluded in boxers, our results suggest that cognitive benefits of high-level sport practice might also be transferred to the daily (i.e., no sport-related) activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-268
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroscience
Volume343
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Dec 18 2016

Fingerprint

Sports
Evoked Potentials
Brain
Athletes
Contingent Negative Variation
Head
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain. / Bianco, Valentina; Di Russo, Francesco; Perri, Rinaldo Livio; Berchicci, Marika.

In: Neuroscience, Vol. 343, 18.12.2016, p. 260-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bianco, Valentina ; Di Russo, Francesco ; Perri, Rinaldo Livio ; Berchicci, Marika. / Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain. In: Neuroscience. 2016 ; Vol. 343. pp. 260-268.
@article{61c97e560c84457e898888cc527ea16b,
title = "Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain",
abstract = "Practicing sport at top level requires excellent physical and cognitive skills. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether specific sport practice may affect the preparation-perception-action stages of processing during a visuo-motor task requiring perceptual discrimination and fast response. We recruited 39 participants (two groups of professional fencers and boxers, and a control group; N=13 for each group) and measured behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) while performing a go/no-go task. Results revealed that athletes were faster than controls, while fencers were more accurate than boxers. ERP analysis revealed that motor preparation, indexed by the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), was increased in athletes than controls, whereas the top-down attentional control, reflected by the prefrontal negativity (pN) component, was enhanced only in fencers when compared to controls. Most of the post-stimulus ERPs i.e. the N1, the N2, the P3, and the pP2, were enhanced in fencers. Combat sports require fast action execution, but the preparatory brain activity might differ according to the specific practice required by each discipline. Boxers might afford to commit more errors (as reflected by high commission error (CE) rate and by a small pN amplitude), while fencers have to be as much fast and accurate as possible (thanks to an enhanced pN amplitude). Although the possible influence of repetitive head blows on cerebral activity cannot be excluded in boxers, our results suggest that cognitive benefits of high-level sport practice might also be transferred to the daily (i.e., no sport-related) activities.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Valentina Bianco and {Di Russo}, Francesco and Perri, {Rinaldo Livio} and Marika Berchicci",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.006",
language = "English",
volume = "343",
pages = "260--268",
journal = "Neuroscience",
issn = "0306-4522",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain

AU - Bianco, Valentina

AU - Di Russo, Francesco

AU - Perri, Rinaldo Livio

AU - Berchicci, Marika

N1 - Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/12/18

Y1 - 2016/12/18

N2 - Practicing sport at top level requires excellent physical and cognitive skills. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether specific sport practice may affect the preparation-perception-action stages of processing during a visuo-motor task requiring perceptual discrimination and fast response. We recruited 39 participants (two groups of professional fencers and boxers, and a control group; N=13 for each group) and measured behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) while performing a go/no-go task. Results revealed that athletes were faster than controls, while fencers were more accurate than boxers. ERP analysis revealed that motor preparation, indexed by the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), was increased in athletes than controls, whereas the top-down attentional control, reflected by the prefrontal negativity (pN) component, was enhanced only in fencers when compared to controls. Most of the post-stimulus ERPs i.e. the N1, the N2, the P3, and the pP2, were enhanced in fencers. Combat sports require fast action execution, but the preparatory brain activity might differ according to the specific practice required by each discipline. Boxers might afford to commit more errors (as reflected by high commission error (CE) rate and by a small pN amplitude), while fencers have to be as much fast and accurate as possible (thanks to an enhanced pN amplitude). Although the possible influence of repetitive head blows on cerebral activity cannot be excluded in boxers, our results suggest that cognitive benefits of high-level sport practice might also be transferred to the daily (i.e., no sport-related) activities.

AB - Practicing sport at top level requires excellent physical and cognitive skills. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether specific sport practice may affect the preparation-perception-action stages of processing during a visuo-motor task requiring perceptual discrimination and fast response. We recruited 39 participants (two groups of professional fencers and boxers, and a control group; N=13 for each group) and measured behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) while performing a go/no-go task. Results revealed that athletes were faster than controls, while fencers were more accurate than boxers. ERP analysis revealed that motor preparation, indexed by the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), was increased in athletes than controls, whereas the top-down attentional control, reflected by the prefrontal negativity (pN) component, was enhanced only in fencers when compared to controls. Most of the post-stimulus ERPs i.e. the N1, the N2, the P3, and the pP2, were enhanced in fencers. Combat sports require fast action execution, but the preparatory brain activity might differ according to the specific practice required by each discipline. Boxers might afford to commit more errors (as reflected by high commission error (CE) rate and by a small pN amplitude), while fencers have to be as much fast and accurate as possible (thanks to an enhanced pN amplitude). Although the possible influence of repetitive head blows on cerebral activity cannot be excluded in boxers, our results suggest that cognitive benefits of high-level sport practice might also be transferred to the daily (i.e., no sport-related) activities.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.006

M3 - Article

VL - 343

SP - 260

EP - 268

JO - Neuroscience

JF - Neuroscience

SN - 0306-4522

ER -