Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation

Massimiliano Valeriani, Domenica Le Pera, David Niddam, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Andrew C N Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40-200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1194-1203
Number of pages10
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2000

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Median Nerve
Pain Threshold
Scalp
Electric Stimulation

Keywords

  • Dipolar source modeling
  • Pain
  • SI area
  • SII area
  • Somatosensory evoked potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation. / Valeriani, Massimiliano; Le Pera, Domenica; Niddam, David; Arendt-Nielsen, Lars; Chen, Andrew C N.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 23, No. 8, 08.2000, p. 1194-1203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29c6b6ec35ab421ebce624538e1f04ea,
title = "Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation",
abstract = "Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40-200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.",
keywords = "Dipolar source modeling, Pain, SI area, SII area, Somatosensory evoked potentials",
author = "Massimiliano Valeriani and {Le Pera}, Domenica and David Niddam and Lars Arendt-Nielsen and Chen, {Andrew C N}",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1194::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-E",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1194--1203",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation

AU - Valeriani, Massimiliano

AU - Le Pera, Domenica

AU - Niddam, David

AU - Arendt-Nielsen, Lars

AU - Chen, Andrew C N

PY - 2000/8

Y1 - 2000/8

N2 - Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40-200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

AB - Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40-200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

KW - Dipolar source modeling

KW - Pain

KW - SI area

KW - SII area

KW - Somatosensory evoked potentials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033865196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033865196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1194::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-E

DO - 10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1194::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-E

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1194

EP - 1203

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 8

ER -