Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping

Inge U. Kress, Ludovico Minati, Stefania Ferraro, Hugo D. Critchley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It remains unclear whether direct interpersonal contact is processed differently from similar soft touch applied through inanimate objects. We performed a functional MRI experiment in healthy volunteers, whereby activity during gentle stroking or tapping was compared between stimuli delivered using the experimenters hand or a velvet stick. Stroking with a hand elicited larger responses than the other three conditions in the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory areas and in the posterior insula. The observed effects likely originate from a combination of perceptual differences and cognitive and emotional correlates of contact with another person. This empirical observation indicates that, to ensure ecological validity, studies of affective touch processing should be performed with stimuli delivered with direct interpersonal contact rather than inanimate objects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)646-651
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroReport
Volume22
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 14 2011

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Cortex
Touch
Hand
Skin
Healthy Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observation

Keywords

  • affective touch
  • functional MRI
  • insula
  • somatosensory system
  • tactile stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping. / Kress, Inge U.; Minati, Ludovico; Ferraro, Stefania; Critchley, Hugo D.

In: NeuroReport, Vol. 22, No. 13, 14.09.2011, p. 646-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kress, Inge U. ; Minati, Ludovico ; Ferraro, Stefania ; Critchley, Hugo D. / Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping. In: NeuroReport. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 13. pp. 646-651.
@article{2350d823586943bcb6ba766a396d5ac3,
title = "Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping",
abstract = "It remains unclear whether direct interpersonal contact is processed differently from similar soft touch applied through inanimate objects. We performed a functional MRI experiment in healthy volunteers, whereby activity during gentle stroking or tapping was compared between stimuli delivered using the experimenters hand or a velvet stick. Stroking with a hand elicited larger responses than the other three conditions in the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory areas and in the posterior insula. The observed effects likely originate from a combination of perceptual differences and cognitive and emotional correlates of contact with another person. This empirical observation indicates that, to ensure ecological validity, studies of affective touch processing should be performed with stimuli delivered with direct interpersonal contact rather than inanimate objects.",
keywords = "affective touch, functional MRI, insula, somatosensory system, tactile stimulation",
author = "Kress, {Inge U.} and Ludovico Minati and Stefania Ferraro and Critchley, {Hugo D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d166",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "646--651",
journal = "NeuroReport",
issn = "0959-4965",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping

AU - Kress, Inge U.

AU - Minati, Ludovico

AU - Ferraro, Stefania

AU - Critchley, Hugo D.

PY - 2011/9/14

Y1 - 2011/9/14

N2 - It remains unclear whether direct interpersonal contact is processed differently from similar soft touch applied through inanimate objects. We performed a functional MRI experiment in healthy volunteers, whereby activity during gentle stroking or tapping was compared between stimuli delivered using the experimenters hand or a velvet stick. Stroking with a hand elicited larger responses than the other three conditions in the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory areas and in the posterior insula. The observed effects likely originate from a combination of perceptual differences and cognitive and emotional correlates of contact with another person. This empirical observation indicates that, to ensure ecological validity, studies of affective touch processing should be performed with stimuli delivered with direct interpersonal contact rather than inanimate objects.

AB - It remains unclear whether direct interpersonal contact is processed differently from similar soft touch applied through inanimate objects. We performed a functional MRI experiment in healthy volunteers, whereby activity during gentle stroking or tapping was compared between stimuli delivered using the experimenters hand or a velvet stick. Stroking with a hand elicited larger responses than the other three conditions in the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory areas and in the posterior insula. The observed effects likely originate from a combination of perceptual differences and cognitive and emotional correlates of contact with another person. This empirical observation indicates that, to ensure ecological validity, studies of affective touch processing should be performed with stimuli delivered with direct interpersonal contact rather than inanimate objects.

KW - affective touch

KW - functional MRI

KW - insula

KW - somatosensory system

KW - tactile stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052022071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052022071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d166

DO - 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d166

M3 - Article

C2 - 21817928

AN - SCOPUS:80052022071

VL - 22

SP - 646

EP - 651

JO - NeuroReport

JF - NeuroReport

SN - 0959-4965

IS - 13

ER -