Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review

Giuseppe Filardo, Francesca de Caro, Luca Andriolo, Elizaveta Kon, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 % of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage–ACL treatments. Conclusion: The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach. Level of evidence: IV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Apr 4 2016

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Cartilage
Manuscripts
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Therapeutics
PubMed
Databases

Keywords

  • ACL
  • Cartilage treatment
  • Chondral lesion
  • Knee

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. / Filardo, Giuseppe; de Caro, Francesca; Andriolo, Luca; Kon, Elizaveta; Zaffagnini, Stefano; Marcacci, Maurilio.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 04.04.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a1c0098db1844e168ddb753c84ef2725,
title = "Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose: To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 {\%} of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage–ACL treatments. Conclusion: The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach. Level of evidence: IV.",
keywords = "ACL, Cartilage treatment, Chondral lesion, Knee",
author = "Giuseppe Filardo and {de Caro}, Francesca and Luca Andriolo and Elizaveta Kon and Stefano Zaffagnini and Maurilio Marcacci",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-016-4097-y",
language = "English",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review

AU - Filardo, Giuseppe

AU - de Caro, Francesca

AU - Andriolo, Luca

AU - Kon, Elizaveta

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Marcacci, Maurilio

PY - 2016/4/4

Y1 - 2016/4/4

N2 - Purpose: To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 % of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage–ACL treatments. Conclusion: The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach. Level of evidence: IV.

AB - Purpose: To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 % of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage–ACL treatments. Conclusion: The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach. Level of evidence: IV.

KW - ACL

KW - Cartilage treatment

KW - Chondral lesion

KW - Knee

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962146896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962146896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-016-4097-y

DO - 10.1007/s00167-016-4097-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

ER -