Do Mapping Strategies Influence the Outcome in AF Ablation?

Laura Vitali Serdoz, Riccardo Cappato

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Since 1990s non-pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved rapidly and multiple technical approaches has been developed. Cornerstone of AF ablation is pulmonary vein (PV) activity, considered the dominant source of triggers, but also contributor to AF maintenance and, therefore, the main target of ablation. PV isolation results in maintenance of sinus rhythm in 60-85% of paroxysmal AF patients. AF ablation, in persistent and permanent type, aim to trigger elimination and to modification of the substrate responsible for AF perpetuation: different strategies have been proposed and are currently used. Overall outcome of AF ablation reported by a large number of electrophysiology laboratories worldwide is satisfactory with a positive outcome in approximately 80% of patients. This edition first published 2013

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCardiac Mapping: Fourth Edition
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages391-399
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9780470670460
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 18 2012

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Atrial fibrillation trigger
  • Catheter ablation
  • Outcome
  • Paroxysmal
  • Persistent
  • Pulmonary veins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do Mapping Strategies Influence the Outcome in AF Ablation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Serdoz, L. V., & Cappato, R. (2012). Do Mapping Strategies Influence the Outcome in AF Ablation? In Cardiac Mapping: Fourth Edition (pp. 391-399). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118481585.ch34