Do neurologists around the world agree when diagnosing epilepsy? - Results of an international EpiNet study

EpiNet Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown moderate agreement between physicians when diagnosing epilepsy, but have included small numbers. The EpiNet study group was established to undertake multicentre clinical trials in epilepsy. Before commencing trials, we wanted to determine levels of agreement between physicians from different countries and different health systems when diagnosing epilepsy, specific seizure types and etiologies.

METHODS: 30 Case scenarios describing six children and 24 adults with paroxysmal events (21 epileptic seizures, nine non-epileptic attacks) were presented to physicians with an interest in epilepsy. Physicians were asked how likely was a diagnosis of epilepsy; if seizures were generalised or focal; and the likely etiology. For 23 cases, clinical information was presented in Step 1, and investigations in Step 2.

RESULTS: 189 Participants from 36 countries completed the 30 cases. Levels of agreement were determined for 154 participants who provided details regarding their clinical experience. There was substantial agreement for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa=0.61); agreement was fair to moderate for seizure type(s) (kappa=0.40) and etiology (kappa=0.41). For 23 cases with two steps, agreement increased from step 1 to step 2 for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa 0.56-0.70), seizure type(s) (kappa 0.38-0.52), and etiology (kappa 0.38-0.47). Agreement was better for 53 epileptologists (diagnosis of epilepsy, kappa=0.66) than 56 neurologists with a special interest in epilepsy (kappa=0.58). Levels of agreement differed slightly between physicians practicing in different parts of the world, between child and adult neurologists, and according to one's experience with epilepsy.

CONCLUSION: Although there is substantial agreement when epileptologists diagnose epilepsy, there is less agreement for diagnoses of seizure types and etiology. Further education of physicians regarding semiology of different seizure types is required. Differences in approach to diagnosis, both between physicians and between countries, could impact negatively on clinical trials of anti-epileptic drugs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-50
Number of pages8
JournalEpilepsy Research
Volume139
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Seizures
Physicians
Neurologists
Clinical Trials
Multicenter Studies
Education
Health

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Epilepsy/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internationality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurologists
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Seizures/diagnosis
  • Specialization
  • Young Adult

Cite this

Do neurologists around the world agree when diagnosing epilepsy? - Results of an international EpiNet study. / EpiNet Study Group.

In: Epilepsy Research, Vol. 139, 01.2018, p. 43-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f6767c894b3473ab835ae8b583c076c,
title = "Do neurologists around the world agree when diagnosing epilepsy? - Results of an international EpiNet study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown moderate agreement between physicians when diagnosing epilepsy, but have included small numbers. The EpiNet study group was established to undertake multicentre clinical trials in epilepsy. Before commencing trials, we wanted to determine levels of agreement between physicians from different countries and different health systems when diagnosing epilepsy, specific seizure types and etiologies.METHODS: 30 Case scenarios describing six children and 24 adults with paroxysmal events (21 epileptic seizures, nine non-epileptic attacks) were presented to physicians with an interest in epilepsy. Physicians were asked how likely was a diagnosis of epilepsy; if seizures were generalised or focal; and the likely etiology. For 23 cases, clinical information was presented in Step 1, and investigations in Step 2.RESULTS: 189 Participants from 36 countries completed the 30 cases. Levels of agreement were determined for 154 participants who provided details regarding their clinical experience. There was substantial agreement for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa=0.61); agreement was fair to moderate for seizure type(s) (kappa=0.40) and etiology (kappa=0.41). For 23 cases with two steps, agreement increased from step 1 to step 2 for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa 0.56-0.70), seizure type(s) (kappa 0.38-0.52), and etiology (kappa 0.38-0.47). Agreement was better for 53 epileptologists (diagnosis of epilepsy, kappa=0.66) than 56 neurologists with a special interest in epilepsy (kappa=0.58). Levels of agreement differed slightly between physicians practicing in different parts of the world, between child and adult neurologists, and according to one's experience with epilepsy.CONCLUSION: Although there is substantial agreement when epileptologists diagnose epilepsy, there is less agreement for diagnoses of seizure types and etiology. Further education of physicians regarding semiology of different seizure types is required. Differences in approach to diagnosis, both between physicians and between countries, could impact negatively on clinical trials of anti-epileptic drugs.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Clinical Decision-Making, Epilepsy/diagnosis, Female, Humans, Internationality, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologists, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Seizures/diagnosis, Specialization, Young Adult",
author = "{EpiNet Study Group} and Bergin, {Peter S} and Ettore Beghi and Sadleir, {Lynette G} and Manjari Tripathi and Richardson, {Mark P} and Elisa Bianchi and D'Souza, {Wendyl J}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.014",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "43--50",
journal = "Epilepsy Research",
issn = "0920-1211",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do neurologists around the world agree when diagnosing epilepsy? - Results of an international EpiNet study

AU - EpiNet Study Group

AU - Bergin, Peter S

AU - Beghi, Ettore

AU - Sadleir, Lynette G

AU - Tripathi, Manjari

AU - Richardson, Mark P

AU - Bianchi, Elisa

AU - D'Souza, Wendyl J

N1 - Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown moderate agreement between physicians when diagnosing epilepsy, but have included small numbers. The EpiNet study group was established to undertake multicentre clinical trials in epilepsy. Before commencing trials, we wanted to determine levels of agreement between physicians from different countries and different health systems when diagnosing epilepsy, specific seizure types and etiologies.METHODS: 30 Case scenarios describing six children and 24 adults with paroxysmal events (21 epileptic seizures, nine non-epileptic attacks) were presented to physicians with an interest in epilepsy. Physicians were asked how likely was a diagnosis of epilepsy; if seizures were generalised or focal; and the likely etiology. For 23 cases, clinical information was presented in Step 1, and investigations in Step 2.RESULTS: 189 Participants from 36 countries completed the 30 cases. Levels of agreement were determined for 154 participants who provided details regarding their clinical experience. There was substantial agreement for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa=0.61); agreement was fair to moderate for seizure type(s) (kappa=0.40) and etiology (kappa=0.41). For 23 cases with two steps, agreement increased from step 1 to step 2 for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa 0.56-0.70), seizure type(s) (kappa 0.38-0.52), and etiology (kappa 0.38-0.47). Agreement was better for 53 epileptologists (diagnosis of epilepsy, kappa=0.66) than 56 neurologists with a special interest in epilepsy (kappa=0.58). Levels of agreement differed slightly between physicians practicing in different parts of the world, between child and adult neurologists, and according to one's experience with epilepsy.CONCLUSION: Although there is substantial agreement when epileptologists diagnose epilepsy, there is less agreement for diagnoses of seizure types and etiology. Further education of physicians regarding semiology of different seizure types is required. Differences in approach to diagnosis, both between physicians and between countries, could impact negatively on clinical trials of anti-epileptic drugs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown moderate agreement between physicians when diagnosing epilepsy, but have included small numbers. The EpiNet study group was established to undertake multicentre clinical trials in epilepsy. Before commencing trials, we wanted to determine levels of agreement between physicians from different countries and different health systems when diagnosing epilepsy, specific seizure types and etiologies.METHODS: 30 Case scenarios describing six children and 24 adults with paroxysmal events (21 epileptic seizures, nine non-epileptic attacks) were presented to physicians with an interest in epilepsy. Physicians were asked how likely was a diagnosis of epilepsy; if seizures were generalised or focal; and the likely etiology. For 23 cases, clinical information was presented in Step 1, and investigations in Step 2.RESULTS: 189 Participants from 36 countries completed the 30 cases. Levels of agreement were determined for 154 participants who provided details regarding their clinical experience. There was substantial agreement for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa=0.61); agreement was fair to moderate for seizure type(s) (kappa=0.40) and etiology (kappa=0.41). For 23 cases with two steps, agreement increased from step 1 to step 2 for diagnosis of epilepsy (kappa 0.56-0.70), seizure type(s) (kappa 0.38-0.52), and etiology (kappa 0.38-0.47). Agreement was better for 53 epileptologists (diagnosis of epilepsy, kappa=0.66) than 56 neurologists with a special interest in epilepsy (kappa=0.58). Levels of agreement differed slightly between physicians practicing in different parts of the world, between child and adult neurologists, and according to one's experience with epilepsy.CONCLUSION: Although there is substantial agreement when epileptologists diagnose epilepsy, there is less agreement for diagnoses of seizure types and etiology. Further education of physicians regarding semiology of different seizure types is required. Differences in approach to diagnosis, both between physicians and between countries, could impact negatively on clinical trials of anti-epileptic drugs.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Child

KW - Clinical Decision-Making

KW - Epilepsy/diagnosis

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Internationality

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neurologists

KW - Quality Assurance, Health Care

KW - Seizures/diagnosis

KW - Specialization

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 29175563

VL - 139

SP - 43

EP - 50

JO - Epilepsy Research

JF - Epilepsy Research

SN - 0920-1211

ER -