Does a research group increase impact on the scientific community or general public discussion? Alternative metric-based evaluation

Manuela De Gregori, Valeria Scotti, Annalisa De Silvestri, Moreno Curti, Guido Fanelli, Massimo Allegri, Michael E. Schatman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of scientific publications of the Italian SIMPAR (Study In Multidisciplinary PAin Research) group by using altmetrics, defined as nontraditional metrics constituting an alternative to more traditional citation-impact metrics, such as impact factor and H-index. By correlating traditional and alternative metrics, we attempted to verify whether publications by the SIMPAR group collectively had more impact than those performed by its individual members, either in solo publications or in publications coauthored by non-SIMPAR group investigators (which for the purpose of this study we will refer to as “individual publications”). For all the 12 members of the group analyzed (pain therapists, biologists, and pharmacologists), we created Open Researcher and Contributor ID and Impact Story accounts, and synchronized these data. Manually, we calculated the level metrics for each article by dividing the data obtained from the research community by those obtained from the public community. We analyzed 759 articles, 18 of which were published by the SIMPAR group. Altmetrics demonstrated that SIMPAR group publications were more likely to be saved (77.8% vs 45.9%), discussed (61.1% vs 1.1%, P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-395
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pain Research
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 11 2016

Keywords

  • Altmetrics
  • Pain-research impact
  • SIMPAR group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does a research group increase impact on the scientific community or general public discussion? Alternative metric-based evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this