Does neurophysiological testing provide the information we need to improve the clinical management of primary dystonia?

Michele Tinazzi, Giovanna Squintani, Alfredo Berardelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emerging pathophysiological findings suggest that primary dystonia originates partly though not exclusively from brain dysfunction involving the basal ganglia and cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical motor circuits. Studies applying various neurophysiological tests, including spinal and brainstem reflexes, transcranial magnetic stimulation, somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetoencephalography, have documented numerous pathophysiological abnormalities in the various forms of primary dystonia. Owing to differences in the methodology used and in the clinical features of the patients enrolled, these studies have often provided controversial results and failed to determine whether neurophysiological findings correlate with patients' clinical features. In this paper, seeking up-to-date information for use in planning future studies we review the role of neurophysiological methods in the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia. To improve the current neurophysiological approach to the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia, future studies should aim to use standardized study designs and methods, enrol homogeneous and clinically well-defined populations and investigate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the available neurophysiological tests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1424-1432
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume120
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Dystonic Disorders
Corpus Striatum
Magnetoencephalography
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Basal Ganglia
Brain Stem
Reflex
Sensitivity and Specificity
Brain
Population

Keywords

  • Dystonia
  • Magnetoelectroencephalography
  • Sensorimotor system
  • Somatosensory evoked potentials
  • Spinal/brainstem reflexes
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Does neurophysiological testing provide the information we need to improve the clinical management of primary dystonia? / Tinazzi, Michele; Squintani, Giovanna; Berardelli, Alfredo.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 120, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 1424-1432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{521ace3af45444288fc5687515daec36,
title = "Does neurophysiological testing provide the information we need to improve the clinical management of primary dystonia?",
abstract = "Emerging pathophysiological findings suggest that primary dystonia originates partly though not exclusively from brain dysfunction involving the basal ganglia and cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical motor circuits. Studies applying various neurophysiological tests, including spinal and brainstem reflexes, transcranial magnetic stimulation, somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetoencephalography, have documented numerous pathophysiological abnormalities in the various forms of primary dystonia. Owing to differences in the methodology used and in the clinical features of the patients enrolled, these studies have often provided controversial results and failed to determine whether neurophysiological findings correlate with patients' clinical features. In this paper, seeking up-to-date information for use in planning future studies we review the role of neurophysiological methods in the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia. To improve the current neurophysiological approach to the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia, future studies should aim to use standardized study designs and methods, enrol homogeneous and clinically well-defined populations and investigate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the available neurophysiological tests.",
keywords = "Dystonia, Magnetoelectroencephalography, Sensorimotor system, Somatosensory evoked potentials, Spinal/brainstem reflexes, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "Michele Tinazzi and Giovanna Squintani and Alfredo Berardelli",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.015",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "1424--1432",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does neurophysiological testing provide the information we need to improve the clinical management of primary dystonia?

AU - Tinazzi, Michele

AU - Squintani, Giovanna

AU - Berardelli, Alfredo

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Emerging pathophysiological findings suggest that primary dystonia originates partly though not exclusively from brain dysfunction involving the basal ganglia and cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical motor circuits. Studies applying various neurophysiological tests, including spinal and brainstem reflexes, transcranial magnetic stimulation, somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetoencephalography, have documented numerous pathophysiological abnormalities in the various forms of primary dystonia. Owing to differences in the methodology used and in the clinical features of the patients enrolled, these studies have often provided controversial results and failed to determine whether neurophysiological findings correlate with patients' clinical features. In this paper, seeking up-to-date information for use in planning future studies we review the role of neurophysiological methods in the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia. To improve the current neurophysiological approach to the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia, future studies should aim to use standardized study designs and methods, enrol homogeneous and clinically well-defined populations and investigate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the available neurophysiological tests.

AB - Emerging pathophysiological findings suggest that primary dystonia originates partly though not exclusively from brain dysfunction involving the basal ganglia and cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical motor circuits. Studies applying various neurophysiological tests, including spinal and brainstem reflexes, transcranial magnetic stimulation, somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetoencephalography, have documented numerous pathophysiological abnormalities in the various forms of primary dystonia. Owing to differences in the methodology used and in the clinical features of the patients enrolled, these studies have often provided controversial results and failed to determine whether neurophysiological findings correlate with patients' clinical features. In this paper, seeking up-to-date information for use in planning future studies we review the role of neurophysiological methods in the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia. To improve the current neurophysiological approach to the clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia, future studies should aim to use standardized study designs and methods, enrol homogeneous and clinically well-defined populations and investigate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the available neurophysiological tests.

KW - Dystonia

KW - Magnetoelectroencephalography

KW - Sensorimotor system

KW - Somatosensory evoked potentials

KW - Spinal/brainstem reflexes

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249092884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68249092884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 19616996

AN - SCOPUS:68249092884

VL - 120

SP - 1424

EP - 1432

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 8

ER -