Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review

Alice Roffi, Giuseppe Filardo, Elizaveta Kon, Maurilio Marcacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several bone implants are applied in clinical practice, but none meets the requirements of an ideal implant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an easy and inexpensive way to obtain growth factors in physiologic proportions that might favour the regenerative process. The aim of this review is to analyse clinical studies in order to investigate the role of PRP in favouring bone integration of graft, graft substitutes, or implants, and to identify the materials for which the additional use of PRP might be associated with superior osseo- and soft tissues integration. Methods. A search on PubMed database was performed considering the literature from 2000 to 2012, using the following string: (Bone Substitutes[Mesh] OR Bone Transplantation[Mesh] OR Bone Regeneration[Mesh] OR Osseointegration[Mesh]) AND (Blood Platelets[Mesh] OR Platelet-Rich Plasma[Mesh]). After abstracts screening, the full-texts of selected papers were analyzed and the papers found from the reference lists were also considered. The search focused on clinical applications documented in studies in the English language: levels of evidence included in the literature analysis were I, II and III. Results: Literature analysis showed 83 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 26 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 14 comparative studies, 29 case series, and 14 case reports. Several implant materials were identified: 24 papers on autologous bone, 6 on freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), 16 on bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), 9 on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), 4 on hydroxyapatite (HA), 2 on titanium (Ti), 1 on natural coral, 1 on collagen sponge, 1 on medical-grade calcium sulphate hemihydrate (MGCSH), 1 on bioactive glass (BG) and 18 on a combination of biomaterials. Only 4 papers were related to the orthopaedic field, whereas the majority belonged to clinical applications in oral/maxillofacial surgery. Conclusions: The systematic research showed a growing interest in this approach for bone implant integration, with an increasing number of studies published over time. However, knowledge on this topic is still preliminary, with the presence mainly of low quality studies. Many aspects still have to be understood, such as the biomaterials that can benefit most from PRP and the best protocol for PRP both for production and application.

Original languageEnglish
Article number330
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 21 2013

Fingerprint

Platelet-Rich Plasma
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Oral Surgery
Biocompatible Materials
Bone Substitutes
Osseointegration
Calcium Sulfate
Anthozoa
Bone Regeneration
Bone Transplantation
Porifera
Durapatite
Titanium
PubMed
Orthopedics
Glass
Allografts
Minerals
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Implant integration
  • Platelets
  • PRP
  • Regenerative medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review. / Roffi, Alice; Filardo, Giuseppe; Kon, Elizaveta; Marcacci, Maurilio.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 14, 330, 21.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{391fc65227694aaba45700ae2b6be7e6,
title = "Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Several bone implants are applied in clinical practice, but none meets the requirements of an ideal implant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an easy and inexpensive way to obtain growth factors in physiologic proportions that might favour the regenerative process. The aim of this review is to analyse clinical studies in order to investigate the role of PRP in favouring bone integration of graft, graft substitutes, or implants, and to identify the materials for which the additional use of PRP might be associated with superior osseo- and soft tissues integration. Methods. A search on PubMed database was performed considering the literature from 2000 to 2012, using the following string: (Bone Substitutes[Mesh] OR Bone Transplantation[Mesh] OR Bone Regeneration[Mesh] OR Osseointegration[Mesh]) AND (Blood Platelets[Mesh] OR Platelet-Rich Plasma[Mesh]). After abstracts screening, the full-texts of selected papers were analyzed and the papers found from the reference lists were also considered. The search focused on clinical applications documented in studies in the English language: levels of evidence included in the literature analysis were I, II and III. Results: Literature analysis showed 83 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 26 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 14 comparative studies, 29 case series, and 14 case reports. Several implant materials were identified: 24 papers on autologous bone, 6 on freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), 16 on bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), 9 on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), 4 on hydroxyapatite (HA), 2 on titanium (Ti), 1 on natural coral, 1 on collagen sponge, 1 on medical-grade calcium sulphate hemihydrate (MGCSH), 1 on bioactive glass (BG) and 18 on a combination of biomaterials. Only 4 papers were related to the orthopaedic field, whereas the majority belonged to clinical applications in oral/maxillofacial surgery. Conclusions: The systematic research showed a growing interest in this approach for bone implant integration, with an increasing number of studies published over time. However, knowledge on this topic is still preliminary, with the presence mainly of low quality studies. Many aspects still have to be understood, such as the biomaterials that can benefit most from PRP and the best protocol for PRP both for production and application.",
keywords = "Bone, Implant integration, Platelets, PRP, Regenerative medicine",
author = "Alice Roffi and Giuseppe Filardo and Elizaveta Kon and Maurilio Marcacci",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2474-14-330",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review

AU - Roffi, Alice

AU - Filardo, Giuseppe

AU - Kon, Elizaveta

AU - Marcacci, Maurilio

PY - 2013/11/21

Y1 - 2013/11/21

N2 - Background: Several bone implants are applied in clinical practice, but none meets the requirements of an ideal implant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an easy and inexpensive way to obtain growth factors in physiologic proportions that might favour the regenerative process. The aim of this review is to analyse clinical studies in order to investigate the role of PRP in favouring bone integration of graft, graft substitutes, or implants, and to identify the materials for which the additional use of PRP might be associated with superior osseo- and soft tissues integration. Methods. A search on PubMed database was performed considering the literature from 2000 to 2012, using the following string: (Bone Substitutes[Mesh] OR Bone Transplantation[Mesh] OR Bone Regeneration[Mesh] OR Osseointegration[Mesh]) AND (Blood Platelets[Mesh] OR Platelet-Rich Plasma[Mesh]). After abstracts screening, the full-texts of selected papers were analyzed and the papers found from the reference lists were also considered. The search focused on clinical applications documented in studies in the English language: levels of evidence included in the literature analysis were I, II and III. Results: Literature analysis showed 83 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 26 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 14 comparative studies, 29 case series, and 14 case reports. Several implant materials were identified: 24 papers on autologous bone, 6 on freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), 16 on bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), 9 on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), 4 on hydroxyapatite (HA), 2 on titanium (Ti), 1 on natural coral, 1 on collagen sponge, 1 on medical-grade calcium sulphate hemihydrate (MGCSH), 1 on bioactive glass (BG) and 18 on a combination of biomaterials. Only 4 papers were related to the orthopaedic field, whereas the majority belonged to clinical applications in oral/maxillofacial surgery. Conclusions: The systematic research showed a growing interest in this approach for bone implant integration, with an increasing number of studies published over time. However, knowledge on this topic is still preliminary, with the presence mainly of low quality studies. Many aspects still have to be understood, such as the biomaterials that can benefit most from PRP and the best protocol for PRP both for production and application.

AB - Background: Several bone implants are applied in clinical practice, but none meets the requirements of an ideal implant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an easy and inexpensive way to obtain growth factors in physiologic proportions that might favour the regenerative process. The aim of this review is to analyse clinical studies in order to investigate the role of PRP in favouring bone integration of graft, graft substitutes, or implants, and to identify the materials for which the additional use of PRP might be associated with superior osseo- and soft tissues integration. Methods. A search on PubMed database was performed considering the literature from 2000 to 2012, using the following string: (Bone Substitutes[Mesh] OR Bone Transplantation[Mesh] OR Bone Regeneration[Mesh] OR Osseointegration[Mesh]) AND (Blood Platelets[Mesh] OR Platelet-Rich Plasma[Mesh]). After abstracts screening, the full-texts of selected papers were analyzed and the papers found from the reference lists were also considered. The search focused on clinical applications documented in studies in the English language: levels of evidence included in the literature analysis were I, II and III. Results: Literature analysis showed 83 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 26 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 14 comparative studies, 29 case series, and 14 case reports. Several implant materials were identified: 24 papers on autologous bone, 6 on freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA), 16 on bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), 9 on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), 4 on hydroxyapatite (HA), 2 on titanium (Ti), 1 on natural coral, 1 on collagen sponge, 1 on medical-grade calcium sulphate hemihydrate (MGCSH), 1 on bioactive glass (BG) and 18 on a combination of biomaterials. Only 4 papers were related to the orthopaedic field, whereas the majority belonged to clinical applications in oral/maxillofacial surgery. Conclusions: The systematic research showed a growing interest in this approach for bone implant integration, with an increasing number of studies published over time. However, knowledge on this topic is still preliminary, with the presence mainly of low quality studies. Many aspects still have to be understood, such as the biomaterials that can benefit most from PRP and the best protocol for PRP both for production and application.

KW - Bone

KW - Implant integration

KW - Platelets

KW - PRP

KW - Regenerative medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887958598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887958598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2474-14-330

DO - 10.1186/1471-2474-14-330

M3 - Article

C2 - 24261343

AN - SCOPUS:84887958598

VL - 14

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

M1 - 330

ER -