La gestione informatizzata delle prescrizioni terapeutiche riduce gli errori di terapia? Confronto tra un sistema informatizzato e il sistema tradizionale.

Translated title of the contribution: Does the electronic prescription reduce drugs errors? Comparison between electronic and manual prescription

Pietro Giurdanella, Patrizio Di Denia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are the major responsible for adverse events in hospitals. Although computerized prescription systems are widely considered the best option to decrease the medication errors, this belief is not evidence based since only few studies assessed their effectiveness. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness on reducing medication errors of the manual prescription system (drugs transcribed in the clinical records) with a computerized system. METHOD: Drugs prescriptions (manual and electronic) were retrospectively analyzed to identify medication errors. A medication error is the lack of clarity and completedness of the prescription. RESULTS: 1587 prescriptions were analyzed with the manual prescription system (phase 1), 1500 with the provisional electronic system (phase 2) and 1034 with the final one (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 an increase of incomplete prescriptions for dose (+17%) and lack of completedness of prescription (+49%) was observed. After some modifications a decrease of "errors" was observed, respectively -39% and -23.5% (p

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)92-98
Number of pages7
JournalAssistenza infermieristica e ricerca : AIR
Volume26
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Electronic Prescribing
Prescription Drugs
Medication Errors
Prescriptions
Drug Prescriptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

La gestione informatizzata delle prescrizioni terapeutiche riduce gli errori di terapia? Confronto tra un sistema informatizzato e il sistema tradizionale. / Giurdanella, Pietro; Di Denia, Patrizio.

In: Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca : AIR, Vol. 26, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 92-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0bc7e268fbd491283b5ed138762dbb6,
title = "La gestione informatizzata delle prescrizioni terapeutiche riduce gli errori di terapia? Confronto tra un sistema informatizzato e il sistema tradizionale.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Medication errors are the major responsible for adverse events in hospitals. Although computerized prescription systems are widely considered the best option to decrease the medication errors, this belief is not evidence based since only few studies assessed their effectiveness. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness on reducing medication errors of the manual prescription system (drugs transcribed in the clinical records) with a computerized system. METHOD: Drugs prescriptions (manual and electronic) were retrospectively analyzed to identify medication errors. A medication error is the lack of clarity and completedness of the prescription. RESULTS: 1587 prescriptions were analyzed with the manual prescription system (phase 1), 1500 with the provisional electronic system (phase 2) and 1034 with the final one (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 an increase of incomplete prescriptions for dose (+17{\%}) and lack of completedness of prescription (+49{\%}) was observed. After some modifications a decrease of {"}errors{"} was observed, respectively -39{\%} and -23.5{\%} (p",
author = "Pietro Giurdanella and {Di Denia}, Patrizio",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
language = "Italian",
volume = "26",
pages = "92--98",
journal = "Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca",
issn = "1592-5986",
publisher = "Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore s.r.l.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - La gestione informatizzata delle prescrizioni terapeutiche riduce gli errori di terapia? Confronto tra un sistema informatizzato e il sistema tradizionale.

AU - Giurdanella, Pietro

AU - Di Denia, Patrizio

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Medication errors are the major responsible for adverse events in hospitals. Although computerized prescription systems are widely considered the best option to decrease the medication errors, this belief is not evidence based since only few studies assessed their effectiveness. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness on reducing medication errors of the manual prescription system (drugs transcribed in the clinical records) with a computerized system. METHOD: Drugs prescriptions (manual and electronic) were retrospectively analyzed to identify medication errors. A medication error is the lack of clarity and completedness of the prescription. RESULTS: 1587 prescriptions were analyzed with the manual prescription system (phase 1), 1500 with the provisional electronic system (phase 2) and 1034 with the final one (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 an increase of incomplete prescriptions for dose (+17%) and lack of completedness of prescription (+49%) was observed. After some modifications a decrease of "errors" was observed, respectively -39% and -23.5% (p

AB - BACKGROUND: Medication errors are the major responsible for adverse events in hospitals. Although computerized prescription systems are widely considered the best option to decrease the medication errors, this belief is not evidence based since only few studies assessed their effectiveness. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness on reducing medication errors of the manual prescription system (drugs transcribed in the clinical records) with a computerized system. METHOD: Drugs prescriptions (manual and electronic) were retrospectively analyzed to identify medication errors. A medication error is the lack of clarity and completedness of the prescription. RESULTS: 1587 prescriptions were analyzed with the manual prescription system (phase 1), 1500 with the provisional electronic system (phase 2) and 1034 with the final one (phase 3). Between phase 1 and 2 an increase of incomplete prescriptions for dose (+17%) and lack of completedness of prescription (+49%) was observed. After some modifications a decrease of "errors" was observed, respectively -39% and -23.5% (p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35748956897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35748956897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

VL - 26

SP - 92

EP - 98

JO - Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca

JF - Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca

SN - 1592-5986

IS - 2

ER -