Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3-D treatment planning system using Report 55 by AAPM Task Group 23

Fausto Declich, Katia Fumasoni, Paola Mangili, Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo, Mauro Iori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background and purpose: A relevant part of radiotherapy treatment planning system QA concerns dose calculation verification. Report 55 by AAPM TG-23 is an instrument for performing dosimetric evaluation of treatment planning systems in case of external photon beams. It was employed by different groups in three radiotherapy departments for controlling performances of RTPS CadPlan Varian-Dosetek, versions 2.7.9, 3.0.6 and 3.1.1. Materials and methods: Once the basic data of the AAPM 4 MV and 18 MV X-ray units had been converted into the CadPlan format and the AAPM units configured, the whole set of TG23 tests were carried out on three different systems. According to Report 55, comparisons between values measured by TG-23 and calculated by RTPS were made in terms of dose at selected points and radiological field width at different depths. Results: As far as dose is concerned, 266 data were compared for 4 MV and 297 for 18 MV. Ninety-five- point-nine percent of dose deviations for 4 MV and 92.6% for 18 MV are less than 2%. Most of the relevant discrepancies for both energies occur in a test case where dose has to be calculated under a long narrow block centred on the beam axis. Deviations as much as 6.1% for 4 MV and - 7.5% for 18 MV were observed in points at 1 cm depth under the block. Poor results were also observed in the rectangular field 25 x 5, in points outside the field edges under collimators. As regards radiological field width, 58 out of 64 comparisons for 4 MV occurred in the range ± 2 mm. For 18 MV the biggest deviation was - 2.2 mm. Conclusions: The TG-23 tests demonstrated that the accuracy of the RTPS in dose calculation is good in most of the typical radiotherapy applications. Our results are better than those recently published for other RTPS. The TG-23 package turned out to be an effective instrument for QA and calculation verification, as well as being a powerful method for training purpose in configuring and using a RTPS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-77
Number of pages9
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 1999


  • Dosimetric evaluation
  • Quality assurance
  • Radiotherapy treatment planning system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3-D treatment planning system using Report 55 by AAPM Task Group 23'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this