Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package

Valeria Casanova Borca, Massimo Pasquino, Sara Bresciani, Paola Catuzzo, Franca Ozzello, Santi Tofani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is one of the most critical steps in assessing the radiotherapy treatment to achieve the 5% accuracy in dose delivery, which represents the suggested limit to increase the complication-free local control of tumor. We have used the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG-23) test package for clinical photon external beam therapy to evaluate the accuracy of the new version of the PLATO TPS algorithm. The comparison between tabulated values and calculated ones has been performed for 266 and 297 dose values for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. Dose deviations less than 2% were found in the 98.5%- and 90.6% analyzed dose points for the two considered energies, respectively. Larger deviations were obtained for both energies, in large dose gradients, such as the build-up region or near the field edges and blocks. As far as the radiological field width is concerned, 64 points were analyzed for both the energies: 53 points (83%) and 64 points (100%) were within ±2 millimeters for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The results show the good accuracy of the algorithm either in simple geometry beam conditions or in complex ones, in homogeneous medium, and in the presence of inhomogeneities, for low and high energy beams. Our results fit well the data reported by several authors related to the calculation accuracy of different treatment planning systems (TPSs) (within a mean value of 0.7% and 1.2% for 4 and 18 MV respectively). The TG-23 test package can be considered a powerful instrument to evaluate dose calculation accuracy, and as such may play an important role in a quality assurance program related to the commissioning of a new TPS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)744-751
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Photons
Therapeutics
Radiotherapy
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Computational accuracy
  • Task group-23
  • Treatment planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package. / Borca, Valeria Casanova; Pasquino, Massimo; Bresciani, Sara; Catuzzo, Paola; Ozzello, Franca; Tofani, Santi.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 744-751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borca, Valeria Casanova ; Pasquino, Massimo ; Bresciani, Sara ; Catuzzo, Paola ; Ozzello, Franca ; Tofani, Santi. / Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 744-751.
@article{1cdee0de23344c498bdfece941e82589,
title = "Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package",
abstract = "The accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is one of the most critical steps in assessing the radiotherapy treatment to achieve the 5{\%} accuracy in dose delivery, which represents the suggested limit to increase the complication-free local control of tumor. We have used the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG-23) test package for clinical photon external beam therapy to evaluate the accuracy of the new version of the PLATO TPS algorithm. The comparison between tabulated values and calculated ones has been performed for 266 and 297 dose values for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. Dose deviations less than 2{\%} were found in the 98.5{\%}- and 90.6{\%} analyzed dose points for the two considered energies, respectively. Larger deviations were obtained for both energies, in large dose gradients, such as the build-up region or near the field edges and blocks. As far as the radiological field width is concerned, 64 points were analyzed for both the energies: 53 points (83{\%}) and 64 points (100{\%}) were within ±2 millimeters for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The results show the good accuracy of the algorithm either in simple geometry beam conditions or in complex ones, in homogeneous medium, and in the presence of inhomogeneities, for low and high energy beams. Our results fit well the data reported by several authors related to the calculation accuracy of different treatment planning systems (TPSs) (within a mean value of 0.7{\%} and 1.2{\%} for 4 and 18 MV respectively). The TG-23 test package can be considered a powerful instrument to evaluate dose calculation accuracy, and as such may play an important role in a quality assurance program related to the commissioning of a new TPS.",
keywords = "Computational accuracy, Task group-23, Treatment planning",
author = "Borca, {Valeria Casanova} and Massimo Pasquino and Sara Bresciani and Paola Catuzzo and Franca Ozzello and Santi Tofani",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1118/1.1863460",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "744--751",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package

AU - Borca, Valeria Casanova

AU - Pasquino, Massimo

AU - Bresciani, Sara

AU - Catuzzo, Paola

AU - Ozzello, Franca

AU - Tofani, Santi

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - The accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is one of the most critical steps in assessing the radiotherapy treatment to achieve the 5% accuracy in dose delivery, which represents the suggested limit to increase the complication-free local control of tumor. We have used the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG-23) test package for clinical photon external beam therapy to evaluate the accuracy of the new version of the PLATO TPS algorithm. The comparison between tabulated values and calculated ones has been performed for 266 and 297 dose values for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. Dose deviations less than 2% were found in the 98.5%- and 90.6% analyzed dose points for the two considered energies, respectively. Larger deviations were obtained for both energies, in large dose gradients, such as the build-up region or near the field edges and blocks. As far as the radiological field width is concerned, 64 points were analyzed for both the energies: 53 points (83%) and 64 points (100%) were within ±2 millimeters for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The results show the good accuracy of the algorithm either in simple geometry beam conditions or in complex ones, in homogeneous medium, and in the presence of inhomogeneities, for low and high energy beams. Our results fit well the data reported by several authors related to the calculation accuracy of different treatment planning systems (TPSs) (within a mean value of 0.7% and 1.2% for 4 and 18 MV respectively). The TG-23 test package can be considered a powerful instrument to evaluate dose calculation accuracy, and as such may play an important role in a quality assurance program related to the commissioning of a new TPS.

AB - The accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is one of the most critical steps in assessing the radiotherapy treatment to achieve the 5% accuracy in dose delivery, which represents the suggested limit to increase the complication-free local control of tumor. We have used the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG-23) test package for clinical photon external beam therapy to evaluate the accuracy of the new version of the PLATO TPS algorithm. The comparison between tabulated values and calculated ones has been performed for 266 and 297 dose values for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. Dose deviations less than 2% were found in the 98.5%- and 90.6% analyzed dose points for the two considered energies, respectively. Larger deviations were obtained for both energies, in large dose gradients, such as the build-up region or near the field edges and blocks. As far as the radiological field width is concerned, 64 points were analyzed for both the energies: 53 points (83%) and 64 points (100%) were within ±2 millimeters for the 4 and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The results show the good accuracy of the algorithm either in simple geometry beam conditions or in complex ones, in homogeneous medium, and in the presence of inhomogeneities, for low and high energy beams. Our results fit well the data reported by several authors related to the calculation accuracy of different treatment planning systems (TPSs) (within a mean value of 0.7% and 1.2% for 4 and 18 MV respectively). The TG-23 test package can be considered a powerful instrument to evaluate dose calculation accuracy, and as such may play an important role in a quality assurance program related to the commissioning of a new TPS.

KW - Computational accuracy

KW - Task group-23

KW - Treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15744394873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15744394873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1863460

DO - 10.1118/1.1863460

M3 - Article

C2 - 15839346

AN - SCOPUS:15744394873

VL - 32

SP - 744

EP - 751

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 3

ER -