Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease

Is it still useful?

Imerio Angriman, Marco Scarpa, Cesare Ruffolo, Fabio Pomerri, Teresa Filosa, Lino Polese, Duilio Pagano, Lorenzo Norberto, Davide F. D'Amico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of double contrast small-bowel radiography (SBR) in the preoperative assessment of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD between 2000 and 2004, preceded by a preoperative small-bowel series evaluation, were enrolled in our study. The radiologic findings were compared with the intraoperative findings. Results. Small-bowel radiography was associated with good specificity and sensitivity for the detection of stenosis. Although its main limitation was a remarkable overestimation of stenosis, the main indications for surgery were always confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the detection of internal fistulas and the correlation was significant only for SBR performed within 3 months of the operation; however, the concordance between radiological and operative findings was greater. No correlation was observed for the detection of an abdominal mass. Conclusions. Small-bowel radiography is still reliable for evaluating stenoses and internal fistulas. However, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography is mandatory to evaluate an abdominal mass.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)700-704
Number of pages5
JournalSurgery Today
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Radiography
Crohn Disease
Pathologic Constriction
Fistula
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Crohn's disease
  • Fistula
  • Small-bowel radiography
  • Stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease : Is it still useful? / Angriman, Imerio; Scarpa, Marco; Ruffolo, Cesare; Pomerri, Fabio; Filosa, Teresa; Polese, Lino; Pagano, Duilio; Norberto, Lorenzo; D'Amico, Davide F.

In: Surgery Today, Vol. 38, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 700-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angriman, I, Scarpa, M, Ruffolo, C, Pomerri, F, Filosa, T, Polese, L, Pagano, D, Norberto, L & D'Amico, DF 2008, 'Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease: Is it still useful?', Surgery Today, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 700-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8
Angriman, Imerio ; Scarpa, Marco ; Ruffolo, Cesare ; Pomerri, Fabio ; Filosa, Teresa ; Polese, Lino ; Pagano, Duilio ; Norberto, Lorenzo ; D'Amico, Davide F. / Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease : Is it still useful?. In: Surgery Today. 2008 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 700-704.
@article{217ffacb94064e628b5ce342e3aba75d,
title = "Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease: Is it still useful?",
abstract = "Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of double contrast small-bowel radiography (SBR) in the preoperative assessment of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD between 2000 and 2004, preceded by a preoperative small-bowel series evaluation, were enrolled in our study. The radiologic findings were compared with the intraoperative findings. Results. Small-bowel radiography was associated with good specificity and sensitivity for the detection of stenosis. Although its main limitation was a remarkable overestimation of stenosis, the main indications for surgery were always confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the detection of internal fistulas and the correlation was significant only for SBR performed within 3 months of the operation; however, the concordance between radiological and operative findings was greater. No correlation was observed for the detection of an abdominal mass. Conclusions. Small-bowel radiography is still reliable for evaluating stenoses and internal fistulas. However, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography is mandatory to evaluate an abdominal mass.",
keywords = "Crohn's disease, Fistula, Small-bowel radiography, Stenosis",
author = "Imerio Angriman and Marco Scarpa and Cesare Ruffolo and Fabio Pomerri and Teresa Filosa and Lino Polese and Duilio Pagano and Lorenzo Norberto and D'Amico, {Davide F.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "700--704",
journal = "Surgery Today",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double contrast small-bowel radiography in the preoperative assessment of Crohn's disease

T2 - Is it still useful?

AU - Angriman, Imerio

AU - Scarpa, Marco

AU - Ruffolo, Cesare

AU - Pomerri, Fabio

AU - Filosa, Teresa

AU - Polese, Lino

AU - Pagano, Duilio

AU - Norberto, Lorenzo

AU - D'Amico, Davide F.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of double contrast small-bowel radiography (SBR) in the preoperative assessment of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD between 2000 and 2004, preceded by a preoperative small-bowel series evaluation, were enrolled in our study. The radiologic findings were compared with the intraoperative findings. Results. Small-bowel radiography was associated with good specificity and sensitivity for the detection of stenosis. Although its main limitation was a remarkable overestimation of stenosis, the main indications for surgery were always confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the detection of internal fistulas and the correlation was significant only for SBR performed within 3 months of the operation; however, the concordance between radiological and operative findings was greater. No correlation was observed for the detection of an abdominal mass. Conclusions. Small-bowel radiography is still reliable for evaluating stenoses and internal fistulas. However, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography is mandatory to evaluate an abdominal mass.

AB - Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of double contrast small-bowel radiography (SBR) in the preoperative assessment of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CD between 2000 and 2004, preceded by a preoperative small-bowel series evaluation, were enrolled in our study. The radiologic findings were compared with the intraoperative findings. Results. Small-bowel radiography was associated with good specificity and sensitivity for the detection of stenosis. Although its main limitation was a remarkable overestimation of stenosis, the main indications for surgery were always confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the detection of internal fistulas and the correlation was significant only for SBR performed within 3 months of the operation; however, the concordance between radiological and operative findings was greater. No correlation was observed for the detection of an abdominal mass. Conclusions. Small-bowel radiography is still reliable for evaluating stenoses and internal fistulas. However, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography is mandatory to evaluate an abdominal mass.

KW - Crohn's disease

KW - Fistula

KW - Small-bowel radiography

KW - Stenosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48549107534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48549107534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8

DO - 10.1007/s00595-007-3700-8

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 700

EP - 704

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 8

ER -