Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies

How should we assess outcomes?

Massimo Leone, Angelo Franzini, Alberto Proietti Cecchini, Eliana Mea, Cesare Peccarisi, Vincenzo Tullo, Giovanni Broggi, Gennaro Bussone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The introduction of neurostimulation procedures for chronic drug-resistant primary headaches has offered new hope to patients, but has also introduced new problems. The methods to be used in assessing clinical outcomes and monitoring treatment efficacy need careful attention. The International Headache Society guidelines recommend that treatment efficacy should be monitored by getting patients to report the number of attacks per day, in a headache diary. The headache diary is a fundamental instrument for objectively assessing subjective pain in terms of headache frequency, intensity and duration and analgesic consumption. The huge discrepancy sometimes reported between patient satisfaction and headache improvement suggests that patient satisfaction should not be a primary efficacy endpoint, and more importantly should not be put forward as an argument in establishing the efficacy of highly experimental neurostimulation procedures.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeurological Sciences
Volume31
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Headache
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Patient Satisfaction
Hope
Therapeutics
Analgesics
Guidelines
Pain

Keywords

  • Drug resistant
  • Headache
  • Neurostimulation
  • Outcome
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Dermatology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies : How should we assess outcomes? / Leone, Massimo; Franzini, Angelo; Cecchini, Alberto Proietti; Mea, Eliana; Peccarisi, Cesare; Tullo, Vincenzo; Broggi, Giovanni; Bussone, Gennaro.

In: Neurological Sciences, Vol. 31, No. SUPPL.1, 06.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leone, Massimo ; Franzini, Angelo ; Cecchini, Alberto Proietti ; Mea, Eliana ; Peccarisi, Cesare ; Tullo, Vincenzo ; Broggi, Giovanni ; Bussone, Gennaro. / Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies : How should we assess outcomes?. In: Neurological Sciences. 2010 ; Vol. 31, No. SUPPL.1.
@article{f52028643e734f3fa1f7103b07fdb898,
title = "Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies: How should we assess outcomes?",
abstract = "The introduction of neurostimulation procedures for chronic drug-resistant primary headaches has offered new hope to patients, but has also introduced new problems. The methods to be used in assessing clinical outcomes and monitoring treatment efficacy need careful attention. The International Headache Society guidelines recommend that treatment efficacy should be monitored by getting patients to report the number of attacks per day, in a headache diary. The headache diary is a fundamental instrument for objectively assessing subjective pain in terms of headache frequency, intensity and duration and analgesic consumption. The huge discrepancy sometimes reported between patient satisfaction and headache improvement suggests that patient satisfaction should not be a primary efficacy endpoint, and more importantly should not be put forward as an argument in establishing the efficacy of highly experimental neurostimulation procedures.",
keywords = "Drug resistant, Headache, Neurostimulation, Outcome, Treatment",
author = "Massimo Leone and Angelo Franzini and Cecchini, {Alberto Proietti} and Eliana Mea and Cesare Peccarisi and Vincenzo Tullo and Giovanni Broggi and Gennaro Bussone",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10072-010-0295-4",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
journal = "Neurological Sciences",
issn = "1590-1874",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies

T2 - How should we assess outcomes?

AU - Leone, Massimo

AU - Franzini, Angelo

AU - Cecchini, Alberto Proietti

AU - Mea, Eliana

AU - Peccarisi, Cesare

AU - Tullo, Vincenzo

AU - Broggi, Giovanni

AU - Bussone, Gennaro

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - The introduction of neurostimulation procedures for chronic drug-resistant primary headaches has offered new hope to patients, but has also introduced new problems. The methods to be used in assessing clinical outcomes and monitoring treatment efficacy need careful attention. The International Headache Society guidelines recommend that treatment efficacy should be monitored by getting patients to report the number of attacks per day, in a headache diary. The headache diary is a fundamental instrument for objectively assessing subjective pain in terms of headache frequency, intensity and duration and analgesic consumption. The huge discrepancy sometimes reported between patient satisfaction and headache improvement suggests that patient satisfaction should not be a primary efficacy endpoint, and more importantly should not be put forward as an argument in establishing the efficacy of highly experimental neurostimulation procedures.

AB - The introduction of neurostimulation procedures for chronic drug-resistant primary headaches has offered new hope to patients, but has also introduced new problems. The methods to be used in assessing clinical outcomes and monitoring treatment efficacy need careful attention. The International Headache Society guidelines recommend that treatment efficacy should be monitored by getting patients to report the number of attacks per day, in a headache diary. The headache diary is a fundamental instrument for objectively assessing subjective pain in terms of headache frequency, intensity and duration and analgesic consumption. The huge discrepancy sometimes reported between patient satisfaction and headache improvement suggests that patient satisfaction should not be a primary efficacy endpoint, and more importantly should not be put forward as an argument in establishing the efficacy of highly experimental neurostimulation procedures.

KW - Drug resistant

KW - Headache

KW - Neurostimulation

KW - Outcome

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955876144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955876144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10072-010-0295-4

DO - 10.1007/s10072-010-0295-4

M3 - Article

VL - 31

JO - Neurological Sciences

JF - Neurological Sciences

SN - 1590-1874

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -