Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Alessandra Gennari, Martin Stockler, Matteo Puntoni, Mariapia Sormani, Oriana Nanni, Dino Amadori, Nicholas Wilcken, Mauro D'Amico, Andrea DeCensi, Paolo Bruzzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different first-line chemotherapy durations in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We searched literature databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared different chemotherapy durations in the first-line treatment of MBC. Only trials with unconfounded comparisons of additional cycles of chemotherapy were included. The main outcome measures for this analysis were OS and PFS. Published data from retrieved studies were analyzed according to standard meta-analytic techniques. Results: We found 11 randomized clinical trials including 2,269 patients. Longer first-line chemotherapy duration resulted into a significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99; P = .046) and PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.76; P <.001). There were no differences in effects on either OS or PFS between subgroups defined by time of random assignment, study design, number of chemotherapy cycles in the control arm or concomitant endocrine therapy. Conclusion: Longer first-line chemotherapy duration is associated with marginally longer OS and a substantially longer PFS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2144-2149
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this