Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study

Fabio Farinati, Adriana Sergio, Anna Baldan, Anna Giacomin, Maria Anna Di Nolfo, Paolo Del Poggio, Luisa Benvegnu, Gianludovico Rapaccini, Marco Zoli, Franco Borzio, Edoardo G. Giannini, Eugenio Caturelli, Franco Trevisani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: A consensus on the most reliable staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still lacking but the most used is a revised Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, adopted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). We investigated how many patients are diagnosed in "very early" and "early" stage, follow the AASLD guidelines for treatment and whether their survival depends on treatment. Methods: Data were collected in 530 "very early" and "early" HCC patients recruited by a multicentric Italian collaborative group (ITA.LI.CA). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and the log rank to test the statistical significance of difference between groups. Cox's multivariate stepwise regression analysis was used to pinpoint independent prognostic factors and the adjusted relative risks (hazard ratios) were calculated as well. A statistical analysis based on the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in clinical or pathological features between patients. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: "Very early" HCC were 3%; Cox multivariate analysis did not identify variables independently associated with survival. The patients following AASLD recommendations (20%) did not show longer survival. In "early" HCC patients (25%), treatment significantly modulated survival (p = 0.0001); the 28% patients treated according to the AASLD criteria survived longer (p = 0,004). The Cox analysis however identified only age, gender, number of lesions and Child class as independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: patients with very early" HCC were very few in this analysis. In most instances they were not treated with the treatment suggested as the most appropriate by the AASLD guidelines and the type of treatment had no impact on survival, even though the number of patients was relatively low and part of the patients were diagnosed before the introduction of the guidelines: this analysis, therefore, might not be considered as conclusive and should be validated. The "early" stage group involved more patients, rarely treated according to the guidelines, both overall and also in those diagnosed after their publication; the survival was in part predicted by the type of treatment, with better results in those treated according to AASLD indications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number33
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 27 2009

Fingerprint

Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Survival
Liver Diseases
Guidelines
Therapeutics
Chi-Square Distribution
Liver Neoplasms
Publications
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics

Cite this

Farinati, F., Sergio, A., Baldan, A., Giacomin, A., Di Nolfo, M. A., Del Poggio, P., ... Trevisani, F. (2009). Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study. BMC Cancer, 9, [33]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-33

Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma : When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study. / Farinati, Fabio; Sergio, Adriana; Baldan, Anna; Giacomin, Anna; Di Nolfo, Maria Anna; Del Poggio, Paolo; Benvegnu, Luisa; Rapaccini, Gianludovico; Zoli, Marco; Borzio, Franco; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Caturelli, Eugenio; Trevisani, Franco.

In: BMC Cancer, Vol. 9, 33, 27.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farinati, F, Sergio, A, Baldan, A, Giacomin, A, Di Nolfo, MA, Del Poggio, P, Benvegnu, L, Rapaccini, G, Zoli, M, Borzio, F, Giannini, EG, Caturelli, E & Trevisani, F 2009, 'Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study', BMC Cancer, vol. 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-33
Farinati, Fabio ; Sergio, Adriana ; Baldan, Anna ; Giacomin, Anna ; Di Nolfo, Maria Anna ; Del Poggio, Paolo ; Benvegnu, Luisa ; Rapaccini, Gianludovico ; Zoli, Marco ; Borzio, Franco ; Giannini, Edoardo G. ; Caturelli, Eugenio ; Trevisani, Franco. / Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma : When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study. In: BMC Cancer. 2009 ; Vol. 9.
@article{93d05dc0547d4eef9e2785f64b448be5,
title = "Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study",
abstract = "Background: A consensus on the most reliable staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still lacking but the most used is a revised Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, adopted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). We investigated how many patients are diagnosed in {"}very early{"} and {"}early{"} stage, follow the AASLD guidelines for treatment and whether their survival depends on treatment. Methods: Data were collected in 530 {"}very early{"} and {"}early{"} HCC patients recruited by a multicentric Italian collaborative group (ITA.LI.CA). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and the log rank to test the statistical significance of difference between groups. Cox's multivariate stepwise regression analysis was used to pinpoint independent prognostic factors and the adjusted relative risks (hazard ratios) were calculated as well. A statistical analysis based on the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in clinical or pathological features between patients. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: {"}Very early{"} HCC were 3{\%}; Cox multivariate analysis did not identify variables independently associated with survival. The patients following AASLD recommendations (20{\%}) did not show longer survival. In {"}early{"} HCC patients (25{\%}), treatment significantly modulated survival (p = 0.0001); the 28{\%} patients treated according to the AASLD criteria survived longer (p = 0,004). The Cox analysis however identified only age, gender, number of lesions and Child class as independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: patients with very early{"} HCC were very few in this analysis. In most instances they were not treated with the treatment suggested as the most appropriate by the AASLD guidelines and the type of treatment had no impact on survival, even though the number of patients was relatively low and part of the patients were diagnosed before the introduction of the guidelines: this analysis, therefore, might not be considered as conclusive and should be validated. The {"}early{"} stage group involved more patients, rarely treated according to the guidelines, both overall and also in those diagnosed after their publication; the survival was in part predicted by the type of treatment, with better results in those treated according to AASLD indications.",
author = "Fabio Farinati and Adriana Sergio and Anna Baldan and Anna Giacomin and {Di Nolfo}, {Maria Anna} and {Del Poggio}, Paolo and Luisa Benvegnu and Gianludovico Rapaccini and Marco Zoli and Franco Borzio and Giannini, {Edoardo G.} and Eugenio Caturelli and Franco Trevisani",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2407-9-33",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMC Cancer",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma

T2 - When and how much do staging and choice of treatment really matter? A multi-center study

AU - Farinati, Fabio

AU - Sergio, Adriana

AU - Baldan, Anna

AU - Giacomin, Anna

AU - Di Nolfo, Maria Anna

AU - Del Poggio, Paolo

AU - Benvegnu, Luisa

AU - Rapaccini, Gianludovico

AU - Zoli, Marco

AU - Borzio, Franco

AU - Giannini, Edoardo G.

AU - Caturelli, Eugenio

AU - Trevisani, Franco

PY - 2009/1/27

Y1 - 2009/1/27

N2 - Background: A consensus on the most reliable staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still lacking but the most used is a revised Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, adopted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). We investigated how many patients are diagnosed in "very early" and "early" stage, follow the AASLD guidelines for treatment and whether their survival depends on treatment. Methods: Data were collected in 530 "very early" and "early" HCC patients recruited by a multicentric Italian collaborative group (ITA.LI.CA). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and the log rank to test the statistical significance of difference between groups. Cox's multivariate stepwise regression analysis was used to pinpoint independent prognostic factors and the adjusted relative risks (hazard ratios) were calculated as well. A statistical analysis based on the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in clinical or pathological features between patients. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: "Very early" HCC were 3%; Cox multivariate analysis did not identify variables independently associated with survival. The patients following AASLD recommendations (20%) did not show longer survival. In "early" HCC patients (25%), treatment significantly modulated survival (p = 0.0001); the 28% patients treated according to the AASLD criteria survived longer (p = 0,004). The Cox analysis however identified only age, gender, number of lesions and Child class as independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: patients with very early" HCC were very few in this analysis. In most instances they were not treated with the treatment suggested as the most appropriate by the AASLD guidelines and the type of treatment had no impact on survival, even though the number of patients was relatively low and part of the patients were diagnosed before the introduction of the guidelines: this analysis, therefore, might not be considered as conclusive and should be validated. The "early" stage group involved more patients, rarely treated according to the guidelines, both overall and also in those diagnosed after their publication; the survival was in part predicted by the type of treatment, with better results in those treated according to AASLD indications.

AB - Background: A consensus on the most reliable staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still lacking but the most used is a revised Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, adopted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). We investigated how many patients are diagnosed in "very early" and "early" stage, follow the AASLD guidelines for treatment and whether their survival depends on treatment. Methods: Data were collected in 530 "very early" and "early" HCC patients recruited by a multicentric Italian collaborative group (ITA.LI.CA). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and the log rank to test the statistical significance of difference between groups. Cox's multivariate stepwise regression analysis was used to pinpoint independent prognostic factors and the adjusted relative risks (hazard ratios) were calculated as well. A statistical analysis based on the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in clinical or pathological features between patients. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: "Very early" HCC were 3%; Cox multivariate analysis did not identify variables independently associated with survival. The patients following AASLD recommendations (20%) did not show longer survival. In "early" HCC patients (25%), treatment significantly modulated survival (p = 0.0001); the 28% patients treated according to the AASLD criteria survived longer (p = 0,004). The Cox analysis however identified only age, gender, number of lesions and Child class as independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: patients with very early" HCC were very few in this analysis. In most instances they were not treated with the treatment suggested as the most appropriate by the AASLD guidelines and the type of treatment had no impact on survival, even though the number of patients was relatively low and part of the patients were diagnosed before the introduction of the guidelines: this analysis, therefore, might not be considered as conclusive and should be validated. The "early" stage group involved more patients, rarely treated according to the guidelines, both overall and also in those diagnosed after their publication; the survival was in part predicted by the type of treatment, with better results in those treated according to AASLD indications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849114749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849114749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2407-9-33

DO - 10.1186/1471-2407-9-33

M3 - Article

C2 - 19171074

AN - SCOPUS:60849114749

VL - 9

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

SN - 1471-2407

M1 - 33

ER -