Echocardiographic vs Invasive Measurement of the Direct Flow Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve Mean Gradient: Contradictory or Complementary?

Vasileios F. Panoulas, Azeem Latib, Eustachio Agricola, Helmut Baumgartner, Ottavio Alfieri, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this case report, we explain the reason behind observed differences in echocardiographic and invasively measured mean aortic valve gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A 25-mm Direct Flow valve (Direct Flow Medical Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) was successfully implanted in a patient with severe aortic stenosis via the transfemoral route. The discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic measurements could be explained by the combination of a non-flat velocity profile inside the tubular structure of the Direct Flow valve, which can cause local low pressure fields that result in true high gradients detected using Doppler, and pressure recovery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume31
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Heart Valves
Aortic Valve
Pressure
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Echocardiographic vs Invasive Measurement of the Direct Flow Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve Mean Gradient : Contradictory or Complementary? / Panoulas, Vasileios F.; Latib, Azeem; Agricola, Eustachio; Baumgartner, Helmut; Alfieri, Ottavio; Colombo, Antonio.

In: Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 31, No. 10, 01.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70931133126b4a9ebe916a9fd1afb6a2,
title = "Echocardiographic vs Invasive Measurement of the Direct Flow Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve Mean Gradient: Contradictory or Complementary?",
abstract = "In this case report, we explain the reason behind observed differences in echocardiographic and invasively measured mean aortic valve gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A 25-mm Direct Flow valve (Direct Flow Medical Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) was successfully implanted in a patient with severe aortic stenosis via the transfemoral route. The discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic measurements could be explained by the combination of a non-flat velocity profile inside the tubular structure of the Direct Flow valve, which can cause local low pressure fields that result in true high gradients detected using Doppler, and pressure recovery.",
author = "Panoulas, {Vasileios F.} and Azeem Latib and Eustachio Agricola and Helmut Baumgartner and Ottavio Alfieri and Antonio Colombo",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0828-282X",
publisher = "Pulsus Group Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echocardiographic vs Invasive Measurement of the Direct Flow Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve Mean Gradient

T2 - Contradictory or Complementary?

AU - Panoulas, Vasileios F.

AU - Latib, Azeem

AU - Agricola, Eustachio

AU - Baumgartner, Helmut

AU - Alfieri, Ottavio

AU - Colombo, Antonio

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - In this case report, we explain the reason behind observed differences in echocardiographic and invasively measured mean aortic valve gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A 25-mm Direct Flow valve (Direct Flow Medical Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) was successfully implanted in a patient with severe aortic stenosis via the transfemoral route. The discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic measurements could be explained by the combination of a non-flat velocity profile inside the tubular structure of the Direct Flow valve, which can cause local low pressure fields that result in true high gradients detected using Doppler, and pressure recovery.

AB - In this case report, we explain the reason behind observed differences in echocardiographic and invasively measured mean aortic valve gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A 25-mm Direct Flow valve (Direct Flow Medical Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) was successfully implanted in a patient with severe aortic stenosis via the transfemoral route. The discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic measurements could be explained by the combination of a non-flat velocity profile inside the tubular structure of the Direct Flow valve, which can cause local low pressure fields that result in true high gradients detected using Doppler, and pressure recovery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953344887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953344887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26255214

AN - SCOPUS:84942374083

VL - 31

JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0828-282X

IS - 10

ER -