Economics of One Health: Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna

Giulia Paternoster, Sara Babo Martins, Andrea Mattivi, Roberto Cagarelli, Paola Angelini, Romeo Bellini, Annalisa Santi, Giorgio Galletti, Simonetta Pupella, Giuseppe Marano, Francesco Copello, Jonathan Rushton, Katharina D.C. Stärk, Marco Tamba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2013 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, surveillance information generated in the public health and in the animal health sectors has been shared and used to guide public health interventions to mitigate the risk of West Nile virus (WNV) transmission via blood transfusion. The objective of the current study was to identify and estimate the costs and benefits associated with this One Health surveillance approach, and to compare it to an approach that does not integrate animal health information in blood donations safety policy (uni-sectoral scenario). Costs of human, animal, and entomological surveillance, sharing of information, and triggered interventions were estimated. Benefits were quantified as the averted costs of potential human cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease associated to infected blood transfusion. In the 2009–2015 period, the One Health approach was estimated to represent a cost saving of €160,921 compared to the uni-sectoral scenario. Blood donation screening was the main cost for both scenarios. The One Health approach further allowed savings of €1.21 million in terms of avoided tests on blood units. Benefits of the One Health approach due to short-term costs of hospitalization and compensation for transfusion-associated disease potentially avoided, were estimated to range from €0 to €2.98 million according to the probability of developing WNV neuroinvasive disease after receiving an infected blood transfusion.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0188156
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

West Nile virus
blood transfusion
Viruses
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Blood
Italy
Economics
Health
Costs and Cost Analysis
animal health
economics
monitoring
Blood Transfusion
blood
public health
health information
Costs
Virus Diseases
Animals
Blood Donors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Paternoster, G., Martins, S. B., Mattivi, A., Cagarelli, R., Angelini, P., Bellini, R., ... Tamba, M. (2017). Economics of One Health: Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna. PLoS One, 12(11), [e0188156]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188156

Economics of One Health : Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna. / Paternoster, Giulia; Martins, Sara Babo; Mattivi, Andrea; Cagarelli, Roberto; Angelini, Paola; Bellini, Romeo; Santi, Annalisa; Galletti, Giorgio; Pupella, Simonetta; Marano, Giuseppe; Copello, Francesco; Rushton, Jonathan; Stärk, Katharina D.C.; Tamba, Marco.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 11, e0188156, 01.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paternoster, G, Martins, SB, Mattivi, A, Cagarelli, R, Angelini, P, Bellini, R, Santi, A, Galletti, G, Pupella, S, Marano, G, Copello, F, Rushton, J, Stärk, KDC & Tamba, M 2017, 'Economics of One Health: Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 11, e0188156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188156
Paternoster, Giulia ; Martins, Sara Babo ; Mattivi, Andrea ; Cagarelli, Roberto ; Angelini, Paola ; Bellini, Romeo ; Santi, Annalisa ; Galletti, Giorgio ; Pupella, Simonetta ; Marano, Giuseppe ; Copello, Francesco ; Rushton, Jonathan ; Stärk, Katharina D.C. ; Tamba, Marco. / Economics of One Health : Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 11.
@article{59bec79cd4544dd29e8210566f32cb6a,
title = "Economics of One Health: Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna",
abstract = "Since 2013 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, surveillance information generated in the public health and in the animal health sectors has been shared and used to guide public health interventions to mitigate the risk of West Nile virus (WNV) transmission via blood transfusion. The objective of the current study was to identify and estimate the costs and benefits associated with this One Health surveillance approach, and to compare it to an approach that does not integrate animal health information in blood donations safety policy (uni-sectoral scenario). Costs of human, animal, and entomological surveillance, sharing of information, and triggered interventions were estimated. Benefits were quantified as the averted costs of potential human cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease associated to infected blood transfusion. In the 2009–2015 period, the One Health approach was estimated to represent a cost saving of €160,921 compared to the uni-sectoral scenario. Blood donation screening was the main cost for both scenarios. The One Health approach further allowed savings of €1.21 million in terms of avoided tests on blood units. Benefits of the One Health approach due to short-term costs of hospitalization and compensation for transfusion-associated disease potentially avoided, were estimated to range from €0 to €2.98 million according to the probability of developing WNV neuroinvasive disease after receiving an infected blood transfusion.",
author = "Giulia Paternoster and Martins, {Sara Babo} and Andrea Mattivi and Roberto Cagarelli and Paola Angelini and Romeo Bellini and Annalisa Santi and Giorgio Galletti and Simonetta Pupella and Giuseppe Marano and Francesco Copello and Jonathan Rushton and St{\"a}rk, {Katharina D.C.} and Marco Tamba",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0188156",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economics of One Health

T2 - Costs and benefits of integrated West Nile virus surveillance in Emilia-Romagna

AU - Paternoster, Giulia

AU - Martins, Sara Babo

AU - Mattivi, Andrea

AU - Cagarelli, Roberto

AU - Angelini, Paola

AU - Bellini, Romeo

AU - Santi, Annalisa

AU - Galletti, Giorgio

AU - Pupella, Simonetta

AU - Marano, Giuseppe

AU - Copello, Francesco

AU - Rushton, Jonathan

AU - Stärk, Katharina D.C.

AU - Tamba, Marco

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Since 2013 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, surveillance information generated in the public health and in the animal health sectors has been shared and used to guide public health interventions to mitigate the risk of West Nile virus (WNV) transmission via blood transfusion. The objective of the current study was to identify and estimate the costs and benefits associated with this One Health surveillance approach, and to compare it to an approach that does not integrate animal health information in blood donations safety policy (uni-sectoral scenario). Costs of human, animal, and entomological surveillance, sharing of information, and triggered interventions were estimated. Benefits were quantified as the averted costs of potential human cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease associated to infected blood transfusion. In the 2009–2015 period, the One Health approach was estimated to represent a cost saving of €160,921 compared to the uni-sectoral scenario. Blood donation screening was the main cost for both scenarios. The One Health approach further allowed savings of €1.21 million in terms of avoided tests on blood units. Benefits of the One Health approach due to short-term costs of hospitalization and compensation for transfusion-associated disease potentially avoided, were estimated to range from €0 to €2.98 million according to the probability of developing WNV neuroinvasive disease after receiving an infected blood transfusion.

AB - Since 2013 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, surveillance information generated in the public health and in the animal health sectors has been shared and used to guide public health interventions to mitigate the risk of West Nile virus (WNV) transmission via blood transfusion. The objective of the current study was to identify and estimate the costs and benefits associated with this One Health surveillance approach, and to compare it to an approach that does not integrate animal health information in blood donations safety policy (uni-sectoral scenario). Costs of human, animal, and entomological surveillance, sharing of information, and triggered interventions were estimated. Benefits were quantified as the averted costs of potential human cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease associated to infected blood transfusion. In the 2009–2015 period, the One Health approach was estimated to represent a cost saving of €160,921 compared to the uni-sectoral scenario. Blood donation screening was the main cost for both scenarios. The One Health approach further allowed savings of €1.21 million in terms of avoided tests on blood units. Benefits of the One Health approach due to short-term costs of hospitalization and compensation for transfusion-associated disease potentially avoided, were estimated to range from €0 to €2.98 million according to the probability of developing WNV neuroinvasive disease after receiving an infected blood transfusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035229655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035229655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0188156

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0188156

M3 - Article

C2 - 29176851

AN - SCOPUS:85035229655

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e0188156

ER -