Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty

Renata Alleva, Andrea Tognù, Marco Tomasetti, Maria Serena Benassi, Laura Pazzaglia, Hanna van Oven, Ettore Viganò, Nicola De Simone, Ilaria Pacini, Sandra Giannone, Sanjin Gagic, Raffaele Borghi, Sara Picone, Battista Borghi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the modulation of genes whose expression level is indicative of stress and toxicity following exposure to three anaesthesia techniques, general anaesthesia (GA), regional anaesthesia (RA), or integrated anaesthesia (IA).

METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty receiving GA, RA and IA were enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute of Bologna, Italy and the expression of genes involved in toxicology were evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and on the third day (T2) after surgery in association with biochemical parameters.

RESULTS: All three anaesthesia methods proved safe and reliable in terms of pain relief and patient recovery. Gene ontology analysis revealed that GA and mainly IA were associated with deregulation of DNA repair system and stress-responsive genes, which was observed even after 3-days from anaesthesia. Conversely, RA was not associated with substantial changes in gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on the gene expression analysis, RA technique showed the smallest toxicological effect in hip arthroplasty.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03585647.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPLoS One
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 25 2019

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
hips
Transcriptome
Gene expression
anesthetics
Anesthetics
Hip
anesthesia
Conduction Anesthesia
Anesthesia
Genes
gene expression
Surgery
General Anesthesia
Gene Expression
Deregulation
Orthopedics
Toxicology
Ontology
Toxicity

Cite this

Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. / Alleva, Renata; Tognù, Andrea; Tomasetti, Marco; Benassi, Maria Serena; Pazzaglia, Laura; van Oven, Hanna; Viganò, Ettore; De Simone, Nicola; Pacini, Ilaria; Giannone, Sandra; Gagic, Sanjin; Borghi, Raffaele; Picone, Sara; Borghi, Battista.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 14, No. 7, 25.07.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alleva, R, Tognù, A, Tomasetti, M, Benassi, MS, Pazzaglia, L, van Oven, H, Viganò, E, De Simone, N, Pacini, I, Giannone, S, Gagic, S, Borghi, R, Picone, S & Borghi, B 2019, 'Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty', PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219113
Alleva, Renata ; Tognù, Andrea ; Tomasetti, Marco ; Benassi, Maria Serena ; Pazzaglia, Laura ; van Oven, Hanna ; Viganò, Ettore ; De Simone, Nicola ; Pacini, Ilaria ; Giannone, Sandra ; Gagic, Sanjin ; Borghi, Raffaele ; Picone, Sara ; Borghi, Battista. / Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. In: PLoS One. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 7. pp. 1-19.
@article{8d2753cdcf3d470c83f281d6b7c3bc7c,
title = "Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To investigate the modulation of genes whose expression level is indicative of stress and toxicity following exposure to three anaesthesia techniques, general anaesthesia (GA), regional anaesthesia (RA), or integrated anaesthesia (IA).METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty receiving GA, RA and IA were enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute of Bologna, Italy and the expression of genes involved in toxicology were evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and on the third day (T2) after surgery in association with biochemical parameters.RESULTS: All three anaesthesia methods proved safe and reliable in terms of pain relief and patient recovery. Gene ontology analysis revealed that GA and mainly IA were associated with deregulation of DNA repair system and stress-responsive genes, which was observed even after 3-days from anaesthesia. Conversely, RA was not associated with substantial changes in gene expression.CONCLUSIONS: Based on the gene expression analysis, RA technique showed the smallest toxicological effect in hip arthroplasty.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03585647.",
author = "Renata Alleva and Andrea Togn{\`u} and Marco Tomasetti and Benassi, {Maria Serena} and Laura Pazzaglia and {van Oven}, Hanna and Ettore Vigan{\`o} and {De Simone}, Nicola and Ilaria Pacini and Sandra Giannone and Sanjin Gagic and Raffaele Borghi and Sara Picone and Battista Borghi",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0219113",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on gene expression profiles in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty

AU - Alleva, Renata

AU - Tognù, Andrea

AU - Tomasetti, Marco

AU - Benassi, Maria Serena

AU - Pazzaglia, Laura

AU - van Oven, Hanna

AU - Viganò, Ettore

AU - De Simone, Nicola

AU - Pacini, Ilaria

AU - Giannone, Sandra

AU - Gagic, Sanjin

AU - Borghi, Raffaele

AU - Picone, Sara

AU - Borghi, Battista

PY - 2019/7/25

Y1 - 2019/7/25

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the modulation of genes whose expression level is indicative of stress and toxicity following exposure to three anaesthesia techniques, general anaesthesia (GA), regional anaesthesia (RA), or integrated anaesthesia (IA).METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty receiving GA, RA and IA were enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute of Bologna, Italy and the expression of genes involved in toxicology were evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and on the third day (T2) after surgery in association with biochemical parameters.RESULTS: All three anaesthesia methods proved safe and reliable in terms of pain relief and patient recovery. Gene ontology analysis revealed that GA and mainly IA were associated with deregulation of DNA repair system and stress-responsive genes, which was observed even after 3-days from anaesthesia. Conversely, RA was not associated with substantial changes in gene expression.CONCLUSIONS: Based on the gene expression analysis, RA technique showed the smallest toxicological effect in hip arthroplasty.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03585647.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the modulation of genes whose expression level is indicative of stress and toxicity following exposure to three anaesthesia techniques, general anaesthesia (GA), regional anaesthesia (RA), or integrated anaesthesia (IA).METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty receiving GA, RA and IA were enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute of Bologna, Italy and the expression of genes involved in toxicology were evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and on the third day (T2) after surgery in association with biochemical parameters.RESULTS: All three anaesthesia methods proved safe and reliable in terms of pain relief and patient recovery. Gene ontology analysis revealed that GA and mainly IA were associated with deregulation of DNA repair system and stress-responsive genes, which was observed even after 3-days from anaesthesia. Conversely, RA was not associated with substantial changes in gene expression.CONCLUSIONS: Based on the gene expression analysis, RA technique showed the smallest toxicological effect in hip arthroplasty.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03585647.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219113

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219113

M3 - Article

C2 - 31344051

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

ER -