Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Igor Tsesis, Eyal Rosen, Aviad Tamse, Silvio Taschieri, Massimo Del Fabbro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques has been proposed as an adjunct to endodontic surgery in order to promote bone healing. Studies assessing the added benefits of GTR for the outcome of endodontic surgery are significantly variable in their treatment protocols, follow-up periods, and inclusion criteria, thus generating inconsistent and confusing results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of GTR on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive literature search combined with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was undertaken to identify clinical studies that assessed the added benefit of GTR in endodontic surgery. Results: A trend of better outcome was found when GTR was used compared to control cases, but the results were not statistically significant. Lesion size, lesion type, and membrane type were identified as factors significantly affecting the outcome of GTR versus control cases. GTR techniques favorably affected the outcome of surgical endodontic treatments in cases of large periapical lesions and through-and-through lesions. A favorable outcome was found when using a resorbable membrane over using a nonresorbable membrane or graft alone. Conclusions: GTR techniques may improve the outcome of bone regeneration after surgical endodontic treatments of teeth with certain lesions. Additional large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to further evaluate possible benefits of GTR techniques in endodontic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1039-1045
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Guided Tissue Regeneration
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Therapeutics
Membranes
Bone Regeneration
Clinical Protocols
Tooth
Prospective Studies
Transplants

Keywords

  • Endodontic surgery
  • guided tissue regeneration
  • meta-analysis
  • outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Tsesis, Igor; Rosen, Eyal; Tamse, Aviad; Taschieri, Silvio; Del Fabbro, Massimo.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 37, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 1039-1045.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a443ee9f35a145bc886c125b31fdf71b,
title = "Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques has been proposed as an adjunct to endodontic surgery in order to promote bone healing. Studies assessing the added benefits of GTR for the outcome of endodontic surgery are significantly variable in their treatment protocols, follow-up periods, and inclusion criteria, thus generating inconsistent and confusing results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of GTR on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive literature search combined with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was undertaken to identify clinical studies that assessed the added benefit of GTR in endodontic surgery. Results: A trend of better outcome was found when GTR was used compared to control cases, but the results were not statistically significant. Lesion size, lesion type, and membrane type were identified as factors significantly affecting the outcome of GTR versus control cases. GTR techniques favorably affected the outcome of surgical endodontic treatments in cases of large periapical lesions and through-and-through lesions. A favorable outcome was found when using a resorbable membrane over using a nonresorbable membrane or graft alone. Conclusions: GTR techniques may improve the outcome of bone regeneration after surgical endodontic treatments of teeth with certain lesions. Additional large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to further evaluate possible benefits of GTR techniques in endodontic surgery.",
keywords = "Endodontic surgery, guided tissue regeneration, meta-analysis, outcome",
author = "Igor Tsesis and Eyal Rosen and Aviad Tamse and Silvio Taschieri and {Del Fabbro}, Massimo",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1039--1045",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Tsesis, Igor

AU - Rosen, Eyal

AU - Tamse, Aviad

AU - Taschieri, Silvio

AU - Del Fabbro, Massimo

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Introduction: The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques has been proposed as an adjunct to endodontic surgery in order to promote bone healing. Studies assessing the added benefits of GTR for the outcome of endodontic surgery are significantly variable in their treatment protocols, follow-up periods, and inclusion criteria, thus generating inconsistent and confusing results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of GTR on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive literature search combined with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was undertaken to identify clinical studies that assessed the added benefit of GTR in endodontic surgery. Results: A trend of better outcome was found when GTR was used compared to control cases, but the results were not statistically significant. Lesion size, lesion type, and membrane type were identified as factors significantly affecting the outcome of GTR versus control cases. GTR techniques favorably affected the outcome of surgical endodontic treatments in cases of large periapical lesions and through-and-through lesions. A favorable outcome was found when using a resorbable membrane over using a nonresorbable membrane or graft alone. Conclusions: GTR techniques may improve the outcome of bone regeneration after surgical endodontic treatments of teeth with certain lesions. Additional large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to further evaluate possible benefits of GTR techniques in endodontic surgery.

AB - Introduction: The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques has been proposed as an adjunct to endodontic surgery in order to promote bone healing. Studies assessing the added benefits of GTR for the outcome of endodontic surgery are significantly variable in their treatment protocols, follow-up periods, and inclusion criteria, thus generating inconsistent and confusing results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of GTR on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive literature search combined with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was undertaken to identify clinical studies that assessed the added benefit of GTR in endodontic surgery. Results: A trend of better outcome was found when GTR was used compared to control cases, but the results were not statistically significant. Lesion size, lesion type, and membrane type were identified as factors significantly affecting the outcome of GTR versus control cases. GTR techniques favorably affected the outcome of surgical endodontic treatments in cases of large periapical lesions and through-and-through lesions. A favorable outcome was found when using a resorbable membrane over using a nonresorbable membrane or graft alone. Conclusions: GTR techniques may improve the outcome of bone regeneration after surgical endodontic treatments of teeth with certain lesions. Additional large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to further evaluate possible benefits of GTR techniques in endodontic surgery.

KW - Endodontic surgery

KW - guided tissue regeneration

KW - meta-analysis

KW - outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960438241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960438241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 21763891

AN - SCOPUS:79960438241

VL - 37

SP - 1039

EP - 1045

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 8

ER -