Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcome Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a High-Volume Hospital

N. Pecorelli, Gianpaolo Balzano, Giovanni Capretti, Alessandro Zerbi, Valerio Di Carlo, Marco Braga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Despite the close relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the role of surgeon volume still remains an open issue. Retrospective multi-institutional reviews considered only in-hospital mortality, whereas no data about major complications are available so far. The aim of this study is to assess the independent impact of surgeon volume on outcome after PD in a single high-volume institution. Methods: Demographics and clinical and surgical variables were prospectively collected on 610 patients who underwent PD from August 2001 to August 2009. The cutoff value to categorize high and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) was 12 PD/year. The primary endpoint was operative mortality (death within 30-day post-discharge). Secondary endpoints were morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: In the whole series, mortality was 4. 1%, overall morbidity was 61. 3%, and PF rate was 27. 5%. Two HVS performed 358 PD (58. 6%), while six LVS performed 252 PD (41. 4%). Mortality was 3. 9% for HVS and 4. 3% for LVS (p = 0. 84). The major complication rate was similar for HVS and LVS (14. 5% vs. 16. 2%). The PF rate was higher for LVS (32. 4% vs. 24. 1%, p = 0. 03). The mean LOS was 15. 5 days for HVS vs. 16. 9 days for LVS (p = 0. 11). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for PF occurrence were LVS, soft pancreatic stump, small duct diameter, and longer operative time. Conclusion: Low-volume surgeons had a higher PF rate. However, this did not increase mortality and major morbidity rates probably because of the protective effect of high-volume hospital in improving patient rescue from life-threatening complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)518-523
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

High-Volume Hospitals
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pancreatic Fistula
Length of Stay
Mortality
Hospital Mortality
Morbidity
Operative Time
Surgeons
Multivariate Analysis
Demography

Keywords

  • Hospital volume
  • Pancreas
  • Pancreatic fistula
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Postoperative morbidity
  • Surgeon volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcome Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a High-Volume Hospital. / Pecorelli, N.; Balzano, Gianpaolo; Capretti, Giovanni; Zerbi, Alessandro; Di Carlo, Valerio; Braga, Marco.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 518-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{683eb29d2c5142b5a831307f2391a4b1,
title = "Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcome Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a High-Volume Hospital",
abstract = "Background: Despite the close relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the role of surgeon volume still remains an open issue. Retrospective multi-institutional reviews considered only in-hospital mortality, whereas no data about major complications are available so far. The aim of this study is to assess the independent impact of surgeon volume on outcome after PD in a single high-volume institution. Methods: Demographics and clinical and surgical variables were prospectively collected on 610 patients who underwent PD from August 2001 to August 2009. The cutoff value to categorize high and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) was 12 PD/year. The primary endpoint was operative mortality (death within 30-day post-discharge). Secondary endpoints were morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: In the whole series, mortality was 4. 1{\%}, overall morbidity was 61. 3{\%}, and PF rate was 27. 5{\%}. Two HVS performed 358 PD (58. 6{\%}), while six LVS performed 252 PD (41. 4{\%}). Mortality was 3. 9{\%} for HVS and 4. 3{\%} for LVS (p = 0. 84). The major complication rate was similar for HVS and LVS (14. 5{\%} vs. 16. 2{\%}). The PF rate was higher for LVS (32. 4{\%} vs. 24. 1{\%}, p = 0. 03). The mean LOS was 15. 5 days for HVS vs. 16. 9 days for LVS (p = 0. 11). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for PF occurrence were LVS, soft pancreatic stump, small duct diameter, and longer operative time. Conclusion: Low-volume surgeons had a higher PF rate. However, this did not increase mortality and major morbidity rates probably because of the protective effect of high-volume hospital in improving patient rescue from life-threatening complications.",
keywords = "Hospital volume, Pancreas, Pancreatic fistula, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Postoperative morbidity, Surgeon volume",
author = "N. Pecorelli and Gianpaolo Balzano and Giovanni Capretti and Alessandro Zerbi and {Di Carlo}, Valerio and Marco Braga",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-011-1777-2",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "518--523",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcome Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a High-Volume Hospital

AU - Pecorelli, N.

AU - Balzano, Gianpaolo

AU - Capretti, Giovanni

AU - Zerbi, Alessandro

AU - Di Carlo, Valerio

AU - Braga, Marco

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Background: Despite the close relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the role of surgeon volume still remains an open issue. Retrospective multi-institutional reviews considered only in-hospital mortality, whereas no data about major complications are available so far. The aim of this study is to assess the independent impact of surgeon volume on outcome after PD in a single high-volume institution. Methods: Demographics and clinical and surgical variables were prospectively collected on 610 patients who underwent PD from August 2001 to August 2009. The cutoff value to categorize high and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) was 12 PD/year. The primary endpoint was operative mortality (death within 30-day post-discharge). Secondary endpoints were morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: In the whole series, mortality was 4. 1%, overall morbidity was 61. 3%, and PF rate was 27. 5%. Two HVS performed 358 PD (58. 6%), while six LVS performed 252 PD (41. 4%). Mortality was 3. 9% for HVS and 4. 3% for LVS (p = 0. 84). The major complication rate was similar for HVS and LVS (14. 5% vs. 16. 2%). The PF rate was higher for LVS (32. 4% vs. 24. 1%, p = 0. 03). The mean LOS was 15. 5 days for HVS vs. 16. 9 days for LVS (p = 0. 11). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for PF occurrence were LVS, soft pancreatic stump, small duct diameter, and longer operative time. Conclusion: Low-volume surgeons had a higher PF rate. However, this did not increase mortality and major morbidity rates probably because of the protective effect of high-volume hospital in improving patient rescue from life-threatening complications.

AB - Background: Despite the close relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the role of surgeon volume still remains an open issue. Retrospective multi-institutional reviews considered only in-hospital mortality, whereas no data about major complications are available so far. The aim of this study is to assess the independent impact of surgeon volume on outcome after PD in a single high-volume institution. Methods: Demographics and clinical and surgical variables were prospectively collected on 610 patients who underwent PD from August 2001 to August 2009. The cutoff value to categorize high and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) was 12 PD/year. The primary endpoint was operative mortality (death within 30-day post-discharge). Secondary endpoints were morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: In the whole series, mortality was 4. 1%, overall morbidity was 61. 3%, and PF rate was 27. 5%. Two HVS performed 358 PD (58. 6%), while six LVS performed 252 PD (41. 4%). Mortality was 3. 9% for HVS and 4. 3% for LVS (p = 0. 84). The major complication rate was similar for HVS and LVS (14. 5% vs. 16. 2%). The PF rate was higher for LVS (32. 4% vs. 24. 1%, p = 0. 03). The mean LOS was 15. 5 days for HVS vs. 16. 9 days for LVS (p = 0. 11). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for PF occurrence were LVS, soft pancreatic stump, small duct diameter, and longer operative time. Conclusion: Low-volume surgeons had a higher PF rate. However, this did not increase mortality and major morbidity rates probably because of the protective effect of high-volume hospital in improving patient rescue from life-threatening complications.

KW - Hospital volume

KW - Pancreas

KW - Pancreatic fistula

KW - Pancreaticoduodenectomy

KW - Postoperative morbidity

KW - Surgeon volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856721725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856721725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-011-1777-2

DO - 10.1007/s11605-011-1777-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 22083531

AN - SCOPUS:84856721725

VL - 16

SP - 518

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 3

ER -