TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of a Psychosocial Care Quality Improvement Strategy to Address Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer: The HuCare2 Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
AU - Caminiti, Caterina
AU - Annunziata, Maria Antonietta
AU - Verusio, Claudio
AU - Pinto, Carmine
AU - Airoldi, Mario
AU - Aragona, Marcello
AU - Caputo, Francesca
AU - Cinieri, Saverio
AU - Giordani, Paolo
AU - Gori, Stefania
AU - Mattioli, Rodolfo
AU - Novello, Silvia
AU - Pazzola, Antonio
AU - Procopio, Giuseppe
AU - Russo, Antonio
AU - Sarobba, Giuseppina
AU - Zerilli, Filippo
AU - Diodati, Francesca
AU - Iezzi, Elisa
AU - Maglietta, Giuseppe
AU - Passalacqua, Rodolfo
N1 - Funding Information:
Although various guidelines exist providing evidence-based recommendations on psychosocial care in cancer [Jacobsen 2012], evidence suggests that many patients with cancer who might benefit from these interventions do not receive them [Jacobsen 2015]. This fact formed the basis for an implementation study (HuCare), funded by the Ministry of Health and by the Lombardy Regional Health Trust, conducted in 28 cancer centers nation-wide, completed in 2014. This project evaluated the ˆ‡ƒ•‹„‹Ž‹–› ‘ˆ ƒ •–”ƒ–‡‰› ȋ–Ї Dz uCare Quality Improvement Strategy - HQIS), aimed at integrating into practice 6 psychosocial interventions, recommended by international guidelines. The strategy, based on context analysis and problem solving, includes communication skills training for clinical staff and the support by an external team, to assist staff in identifying obstacles, finding solutions, and strengthening motivation to carry out recommended changes. HuCare Šƒ• †‡‘•–”ƒ–‡† –Ї •–”ƒ–‡‰›ǯ• ˆ‡ƒ•‹„‹Ž‹–› ‹ ƒ real context [Passalacqua 2016], since over 75% of patients had received the psychosocial interventions in 27 of the 28 participating centers. Building on the findings of HuCare, this randomized trial was therefore designed to Assess whether the introduction of the HQIS in oncology wards improves the quality of life of cancer patients. This trial is based on the following hypotheses. -improving communication and relational skills of clinical staff (medical oncologists and nurses) facilitates change of behavior -providing support for context analysis and for the solution of problems detected at a local level favors implementation of recommended psychosocial interventions -carrying out such recommendations improves quality of life of cancer patients who initiate active treatment, i.e. who are at high risk of experiencing a decrease in their HRQoL.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and by the nonprofit volunteer association MEDeA, Medicina e Arte.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Caminiti C et al.
PY - 2021/10/14
Y1 - 2021/10/14
N2 - Importance: Many patients with cancer who would benefit from psychosocial care do not receive it. Implementation strategies may favor the integration of psychosocial care into practice and improve patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Humanization in Cancer Care (HuCare) Quality Improvement Strategy vs standard care as improvement of at least 1 of 2 domains (emotional or social function) of patient health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months. A key secondary aim included investigation of the long-term effect. Design, Setting, and Participants: HuCare2 was a multicenter, incomplete, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 30, 2016, to August 28, 2019, in three 5-center clusters of cancer centers representative of hospital size and geographic location in Italy. The study was divided into 5 equally spaced epochs. Implementation sequence was defined by a blinded statistician; the nature of the intervention precluded blinding for clinical staff. Participants included consecutive adult outpatients with newly diagnosed cancer of any type and stage starting medical cancer treatment. Interventions: The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy comprised (1) clinician communication training, (2) on-site visits for context analysis and problem-solving, and (3) implementation of 6 evidence-based recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the difference between the means of changes of individual scores in emotional or social functions of health-related quality of life detected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (within each group) and during the postintervention epoch compared with control periods (between groups). Long-term effect of the intervention (at 12 months) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: A total of 762 patients (475 [62.3%] women) were enrolled (400 HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy and 362 usual care); mean (SD) age was 61.4 (13.1) years. The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved emotional function during treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P =.008) but not social function (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09; P =.80). Effect on emotional function persisted at 12 months (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P =.04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved the emotional function aspect of health-related quality of life during cancer treatment and at 12 months, indicating a change in clinician behavior and in ward organization. These findings support the need for strategies to introduce psychosocial care; however, more research is needed on factors that may maximize the effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03008993.
AB - Importance: Many patients with cancer who would benefit from psychosocial care do not receive it. Implementation strategies may favor the integration of psychosocial care into practice and improve patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Humanization in Cancer Care (HuCare) Quality Improvement Strategy vs standard care as improvement of at least 1 of 2 domains (emotional or social function) of patient health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months. A key secondary aim included investigation of the long-term effect. Design, Setting, and Participants: HuCare2 was a multicenter, incomplete, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 30, 2016, to August 28, 2019, in three 5-center clusters of cancer centers representative of hospital size and geographic location in Italy. The study was divided into 5 equally spaced epochs. Implementation sequence was defined by a blinded statistician; the nature of the intervention precluded blinding for clinical staff. Participants included consecutive adult outpatients with newly diagnosed cancer of any type and stage starting medical cancer treatment. Interventions: The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy comprised (1) clinician communication training, (2) on-site visits for context analysis and problem-solving, and (3) implementation of 6 evidence-based recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the difference between the means of changes of individual scores in emotional or social functions of health-related quality of life detected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (within each group) and during the postintervention epoch compared with control periods (between groups). Long-term effect of the intervention (at 12 months) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: A total of 762 patients (475 [62.3%] women) were enrolled (400 HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy and 362 usual care); mean (SD) age was 61.4 (13.1) years. The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved emotional function during treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P =.008) but not social function (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09; P =.80). Effect on emotional function persisted at 12 months (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P =.04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved the emotional function aspect of health-related quality of life during cancer treatment and at 12 months, indicating a change in clinician behavior and in ward organization. These findings support the need for strategies to introduce psychosocial care; however, more research is needed on factors that may maximize the effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03008993.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118207473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118207473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28667
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28667
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118207473
VL - 4
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
SN - 2574-3805
IS - 10
M1 - e2128667
ER -