Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients: A randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

Giuseppe Frazzitta, Gabriella Bertotti, Giulio Riboldazzi, Marinella Turla, Davide Uccellini, Natalia Boveri, Gabriele Guaglio, Michele Perini, Cristoforo Comi, Pietro Balbi, Roberto Maestri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Rehabilitation treatments have acute beneficial effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, but whether the effects persist over time is unclear. Objective. To assess whether an intensive rehabilitation treatment (IRT) is effective in improving motor performance compared with a control group in a 12-month follow-up, to investigate whether a second cycle administered after 1 year has the same efficacy as the first treatment, and to determine whether IRT reduces the need for increasing levodopa dosage. Methods. A total of 50 PD patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups; 25 participants had 4 weeks of inpatient physical therapy that included treadmill and stabilometric platform training. At discharge, these patients were invited to continue doing the learned exercises. After 12 months, the same treatment was repeated. The control group of 25 patients received only pharmacological treatment and was invited to practice generic physical exercise at home. The rating scales used for the clinical evaluation were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Sections II and III (UPDRS II and III) and total (UPDRS tot). Results. The authors found that the beneficial effects of IRT persisted over time. A second rehabilitation cycle administered after 1 year was as effective as the first treatment. At the end of the study, daily medication dosage was reduced in treated patients, whereas it was significantly increased in control patients. Conclusion. These findings suggest that the natural worsening of symptoms associated with PD can be effectively counteracted by a properly designed IRT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-150
Number of pages7
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Disease Progression
Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Parkinson Disease
Therapeutics
Exercise
Control Groups
Levodopa
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • Follow-up
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology

Cite this

Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients : A randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. / Frazzitta, Giuseppe; Bertotti, Gabriella; Riboldazzi, Giulio; Turla, Marinella; Uccellini, Davide; Boveri, Natalia; Guaglio, Gabriele; Perini, Michele; Comi, Cristoforo; Balbi, Pietro; Maestri, Roberto.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 26, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 144-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frazzitta, Giuseppe ; Bertotti, Gabriella ; Riboldazzi, Giulio ; Turla, Marinella ; Uccellini, Davide ; Boveri, Natalia ; Guaglio, Gabriele ; Perini, Michele ; Comi, Cristoforo ; Balbi, Pietro ; Maestri, Roberto. / Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients : A randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 144-150.
@article{fe7b660b636b4b26bdc3e69a8a12cf1e,
title = "Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients: A randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up",
abstract = "Background. Rehabilitation treatments have acute beneficial effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, but whether the effects persist over time is unclear. Objective. To assess whether an intensive rehabilitation treatment (IRT) is effective in improving motor performance compared with a control group in a 12-month follow-up, to investigate whether a second cycle administered after 1 year has the same efficacy as the first treatment, and to determine whether IRT reduces the need for increasing levodopa dosage. Methods. A total of 50 PD patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups; 25 participants had 4 weeks of inpatient physical therapy that included treadmill and stabilometric platform training. At discharge, these patients were invited to continue doing the learned exercises. After 12 months, the same treatment was repeated. The control group of 25 patients received only pharmacological treatment and was invited to practice generic physical exercise at home. The rating scales used for the clinical evaluation were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Sections II and III (UPDRS II and III) and total (UPDRS tot). Results. The authors found that the beneficial effects of IRT persisted over time. A second rehabilitation cycle administered after 1 year was as effective as the first treatment. At the end of the study, daily medication dosage was reduced in treated patients, whereas it was significantly increased in control patients. Conclusion. These findings suggest that the natural worsening of symptoms associated with PD can be effectively counteracted by a properly designed IRT.",
keywords = "Follow-up, Parkinson's disease, Rehabilitation",
author = "Giuseppe Frazzitta and Gabriella Bertotti and Giulio Riboldazzi and Marinella Turla and Davide Uccellini and Natalia Boveri and Gabriele Guaglio and Michele Perini and Cristoforo Comi and Pietro Balbi and Roberto Maestri",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1545968311416990",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "144--150",
journal = "Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "Sage Science Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients

T2 - A randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

AU - Frazzitta, Giuseppe

AU - Bertotti, Gabriella

AU - Riboldazzi, Giulio

AU - Turla, Marinella

AU - Uccellini, Davide

AU - Boveri, Natalia

AU - Guaglio, Gabriele

AU - Perini, Michele

AU - Comi, Cristoforo

AU - Balbi, Pietro

AU - Maestri, Roberto

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background. Rehabilitation treatments have acute beneficial effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, but whether the effects persist over time is unclear. Objective. To assess whether an intensive rehabilitation treatment (IRT) is effective in improving motor performance compared with a control group in a 12-month follow-up, to investigate whether a second cycle administered after 1 year has the same efficacy as the first treatment, and to determine whether IRT reduces the need for increasing levodopa dosage. Methods. A total of 50 PD patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups; 25 participants had 4 weeks of inpatient physical therapy that included treadmill and stabilometric platform training. At discharge, these patients were invited to continue doing the learned exercises. After 12 months, the same treatment was repeated. The control group of 25 patients received only pharmacological treatment and was invited to practice generic physical exercise at home. The rating scales used for the clinical evaluation were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Sections II and III (UPDRS II and III) and total (UPDRS tot). Results. The authors found that the beneficial effects of IRT persisted over time. A second rehabilitation cycle administered after 1 year was as effective as the first treatment. At the end of the study, daily medication dosage was reduced in treated patients, whereas it was significantly increased in control patients. Conclusion. These findings suggest that the natural worsening of symptoms associated with PD can be effectively counteracted by a properly designed IRT.

AB - Background. Rehabilitation treatments have acute beneficial effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, but whether the effects persist over time is unclear. Objective. To assess whether an intensive rehabilitation treatment (IRT) is effective in improving motor performance compared with a control group in a 12-month follow-up, to investigate whether a second cycle administered after 1 year has the same efficacy as the first treatment, and to determine whether IRT reduces the need for increasing levodopa dosage. Methods. A total of 50 PD patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups; 25 participants had 4 weeks of inpatient physical therapy that included treadmill and stabilometric platform training. At discharge, these patients were invited to continue doing the learned exercises. After 12 months, the same treatment was repeated. The control group of 25 patients received only pharmacological treatment and was invited to practice generic physical exercise at home. The rating scales used for the clinical evaluation were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Sections II and III (UPDRS II and III) and total (UPDRS tot). Results. The authors found that the beneficial effects of IRT persisted over time. A second rehabilitation cycle administered after 1 year was as effective as the first treatment. At the end of the study, daily medication dosage was reduced in treated patients, whereas it was significantly increased in control patients. Conclusion. These findings suggest that the natural worsening of symptoms associated with PD can be effectively counteracted by a properly designed IRT.

KW - Follow-up

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856327636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856327636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968311416990

DO - 10.1177/1545968311416990

M3 - Article

C2 - 21844282

AN - SCOPUS:84856327636

VL - 26

SP - 144

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 2

ER -