Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up

A comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy

Guido Ragni, Domenico Diaferia, Walter Vegetti, Michela Colombo, Mariangela Arnoldi, Pier Giorgio Crosignani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU), sonohysterography (SHG) with sterile saline solution compared to hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathology in a population of infertile patients before an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Patients/Methods: 98 infertile patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 27-41) underwent TVU assessment and SHG with sterile saline solution immediately followed by hysteroscopy. Results: The clinical findings obtained by TVU, SHG and hysteroscopy were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TVU and SHG compared to hysteroscopy were calculated. The TVU sensitivity and specificity compared with hysteroscopy were 91 and 83% respectively. Using TVU, a 9.2% false positive rate (9 cases) and a 5.1% false negative rate (5 cases) were detected compared to hysteroscopy. The TVU PPV and NPV were 85.4 and 90% respectively. SHG yielded better results: sensitivity and specificity when compared to hysteroscopy were 98 and 94% respectively. The SHG PPV and NPV were 95 and 98% respectively. Accuracy of SHG was significantly better than TVU considering all intrauterine pathologies and polyps. Conclusion: In experienced hands, SHG is an easy, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to diagnostic hysteroscopy in the initial evaluation of uterine cavity infertile patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-188
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Hysteroscopy
Ultrasonography
Sodium Chloride
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pathology
Fertilization in Vitro
Polyps
Prenatal Diagnosis

Keywords

  • Hysteroscopy
  • Infertility
  • Sonohysterography
  • Transvaginal ultrasonography
  • Uterine cavity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up : A comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. / Ragni, Guido; Diaferia, Domenico; Vegetti, Walter; Colombo, Michela; Arnoldi, Mariangela; Crosignani, Pier Giorgio.

In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, Vol. 59, No. 4, 05.2005, p. 184-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ragni, Guido ; Diaferia, Domenico ; Vegetti, Walter ; Colombo, Michela ; Arnoldi, Mariangela ; Crosignani, Pier Giorgio. / Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up : A comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2005 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 184-188.
@article{a16aedc0ef2e4fca837737e89c62249b,
title = "Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up: A comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU), sonohysterography (SHG) with sterile saline solution compared to hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathology in a population of infertile patients before an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Patients/Methods: 98 infertile patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 27-41) underwent TVU assessment and SHG with sterile saline solution immediately followed by hysteroscopy. Results: The clinical findings obtained by TVU, SHG and hysteroscopy were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TVU and SHG compared to hysteroscopy were calculated. The TVU sensitivity and specificity compared with hysteroscopy were 91 and 83{\%} respectively. Using TVU, a 9.2{\%} false positive rate (9 cases) and a 5.1{\%} false negative rate (5 cases) were detected compared to hysteroscopy. The TVU PPV and NPV were 85.4 and 90{\%} respectively. SHG yielded better results: sensitivity and specificity when compared to hysteroscopy were 98 and 94{\%} respectively. The SHG PPV and NPV were 95 and 98{\%} respectively. Accuracy of SHG was significantly better than TVU considering all intrauterine pathologies and polyps. Conclusion: In experienced hands, SHG is an easy, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to diagnostic hysteroscopy in the initial evaluation of uterine cavity infertile patients.",
keywords = "Hysteroscopy, Infertility, Sonohysterography, Transvaginal ultrasonography, Uterine cavity",
author = "Guido Ragni and Domenico Diaferia and Walter Vegetti and Michela Colombo and Mariangela Arnoldi and Crosignani, {Pier Giorgio}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1159/000084294",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "184--188",
journal = "Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation",
issn = "0378-7346",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up

T2 - A comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy

AU - Ragni, Guido

AU - Diaferia, Domenico

AU - Vegetti, Walter

AU - Colombo, Michela

AU - Arnoldi, Mariangela

AU - Crosignani, Pier Giorgio

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Objective: The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU), sonohysterography (SHG) with sterile saline solution compared to hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathology in a population of infertile patients before an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Patients/Methods: 98 infertile patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 27-41) underwent TVU assessment and SHG with sterile saline solution immediately followed by hysteroscopy. Results: The clinical findings obtained by TVU, SHG and hysteroscopy were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TVU and SHG compared to hysteroscopy were calculated. The TVU sensitivity and specificity compared with hysteroscopy were 91 and 83% respectively. Using TVU, a 9.2% false positive rate (9 cases) and a 5.1% false negative rate (5 cases) were detected compared to hysteroscopy. The TVU PPV and NPV were 85.4 and 90% respectively. SHG yielded better results: sensitivity and specificity when compared to hysteroscopy were 98 and 94% respectively. The SHG PPV and NPV were 95 and 98% respectively. Accuracy of SHG was significantly better than TVU considering all intrauterine pathologies and polyps. Conclusion: In experienced hands, SHG is an easy, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to diagnostic hysteroscopy in the initial evaluation of uterine cavity infertile patients.

AB - Objective: The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU), sonohysterography (SHG) with sterile saline solution compared to hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathology in a population of infertile patients before an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Patients/Methods: 98 infertile patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range 27-41) underwent TVU assessment and SHG with sterile saline solution immediately followed by hysteroscopy. Results: The clinical findings obtained by TVU, SHG and hysteroscopy were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TVU and SHG compared to hysteroscopy were calculated. The TVU sensitivity and specificity compared with hysteroscopy were 91 and 83% respectively. Using TVU, a 9.2% false positive rate (9 cases) and a 5.1% false negative rate (5 cases) were detected compared to hysteroscopy. The TVU PPV and NPV were 85.4 and 90% respectively. SHG yielded better results: sensitivity and specificity when compared to hysteroscopy were 98 and 94% respectively. The SHG PPV and NPV were 95 and 98% respectively. Accuracy of SHG was significantly better than TVU considering all intrauterine pathologies and polyps. Conclusion: In experienced hands, SHG is an easy, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to diagnostic hysteroscopy in the initial evaluation of uterine cavity infertile patients.

KW - Hysteroscopy

KW - Infertility

KW - Sonohysterography

KW - Transvaginal ultrasonography

KW - Uterine cavity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21044445492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21044445492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000084294

DO - 10.1159/000084294

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 184

EP - 188

JO - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

JF - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

SN - 0378-7346

IS - 4

ER -