Effects in short and long term of global postural reeducation (GPR) on chronic low back pain: A controlled study with one-year follow-up

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30% was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number271436
JournalTheScientificWorldJournal
Volume2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Physical therapy
disability
Low Back Pain
physical activity
smoking
Patient rehabilitation
Stretching
Pain
Education
education
Muscle Stretching Exercises
Exercise
Therapeutics
Patient Education
Pain Measurement
Habits
Outpatients
Rehabilitation
Smoking
effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{9285cd8eb0f84453bc01e677d4c38597,
title = "Effects in short and long term of global postural reeducation (GPR) on chronic low back pain: A controlled study with one-year follow-up",
abstract = "Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30{\%} was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement.",
author = "Chiara Castagnoli and Francesca Cecchi and {Del Canto}, Antonio and Anita Paperini and Roberta Boni and Guido Pasquini and Federica Vannetti and Claudio MacChi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1155/2015/271436",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "The Scientific World Journal",
issn = "2356-6140",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects in short and long term of global postural reeducation (GPR) on chronic low back pain

T2 - A controlled study with one-year follow-up

AU - Castagnoli, Chiara

AU - Cecchi, Francesca

AU - Del Canto, Antonio

AU - Paperini, Anita

AU - Boni, Roberta

AU - Pasquini, Guido

AU - Vannetti, Federica

AU - MacChi, Claudio

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30% was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement.

AB - Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30% was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928478965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928478965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2015/271436

DO - 10.1155/2015/271436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928478965

VL - 2015

JO - The Scientific World Journal

JF - The Scientific World Journal

SN - 2356-6140

M1 - 271436

ER -