Effects of Action Observation Therapy in Patients Recovering From Total Hip Arthroplasty Arthroplasty: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Caterina Pirali, Maria Isgrò, Carla Vanti, Riccardo Buraschi, Stefano Negrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of action observation therapy (AOT) compared with written information in patients submitted to a physical therapy program after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods We conducted a prospective clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with THA, 62.5% female (aged 69.0 ± 8.5 years), received AOT in addition to conventional physical therapy (experimental group) or written information in addition to conventional physical therapy (exercise and information group) for 10 sessions. Outcomes used were visual analog scale, hip active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index measurements. All measures were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the interventions effects within groups and between groups. Results No relevant baseline differences were observed between groups. Both treatments produced statistically significant improvements on visual analog scale, active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, SF-36, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index immediately after the intervention (all, P < .001). SF-36 (physical functioning subscale) revealed a statistically significant intergroups difference (P = .02) after treatment. Conclusions Both treatments were effective at improving pain, functional status, quality of life, and gait features in patients with primary THA. In addition to conventional physical therapy, AOT improved perceived physical function more than written information. Trial Registration Identifier NCT02861638.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-234
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Chiropractic Medicine
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Hip
Observation
Clinical Trials
Therapeutics
Articular Range of Motion
Visual Analog Scale
Investigational Therapies
Group Psychotherapy
Health Surveys
Gait
Analysis of Variance
Quality of Life
Exercise
Pain

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Hip Replacement
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chiropractics

Cite this

Effects of Action Observation Therapy in Patients Recovering From Total Hip Arthroplasty Arthroplasty : A Prospective Clinical Trial. / Villafañe, Jorge Hugo; Pirali, Caterina; Isgrò, Maria; Vanti, Carla; Buraschi, Riccardo; Negrini, Stefano.

In: Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 229-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60f594792d53417b90af48df980e5319,
title = "Effects of Action Observation Therapy in Patients Recovering From Total Hip Arthroplasty Arthroplasty: A Prospective Clinical Trial",
abstract = "Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of action observation therapy (AOT) compared with written information in patients submitted to a physical therapy program after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods We conducted a prospective clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with THA, 62.5{\%} female (aged 69.0 ± 8.5 years), received AOT in addition to conventional physical therapy (experimental group) or written information in addition to conventional physical therapy (exercise and information group) for 10 sessions. Outcomes used were visual analog scale, hip active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index measurements. All measures were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the interventions effects within groups and between groups. Results No relevant baseline differences were observed between groups. Both treatments produced statistically significant improvements on visual analog scale, active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, SF-36, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index immediately after the intervention (all, P < .001). SF-36 (physical functioning subscale) revealed a statistically significant intergroups difference (P = .02) after treatment. Conclusions Both treatments were effective at improving pain, functional status, quality of life, and gait features in patients with primary THA. In addition to conventional physical therapy, AOT improved perceived physical function more than written information. Trial Registration Identifier NCT02861638.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Hip Replacement, Rehabilitation",
author = "Villafa{\~n}e, {Jorge Hugo} and Caterina Pirali and Maria Isgr{\`o} and Carla Vanti and Riccardo Buraschi and Stefano Negrini",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.011",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "229--234",
journal = "Journal of Chiropractic Medicine",
issn = "1556-3707",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Action Observation Therapy in Patients Recovering From Total Hip Arthroplasty Arthroplasty

T2 - A Prospective Clinical Trial

AU - Villafañe, Jorge Hugo

AU - Pirali, Caterina

AU - Isgrò, Maria

AU - Vanti, Carla

AU - Buraschi, Riccardo

AU - Negrini, Stefano

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of action observation therapy (AOT) compared with written information in patients submitted to a physical therapy program after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods We conducted a prospective clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with THA, 62.5% female (aged 69.0 ± 8.5 years), received AOT in addition to conventional physical therapy (experimental group) or written information in addition to conventional physical therapy (exercise and information group) for 10 sessions. Outcomes used were visual analog scale, hip active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index measurements. All measures were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the interventions effects within groups and between groups. Results No relevant baseline differences were observed between groups. Both treatments produced statistically significant improvements on visual analog scale, active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, SF-36, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index immediately after the intervention (all, P < .001). SF-36 (physical functioning subscale) revealed a statistically significant intergroups difference (P = .02) after treatment. Conclusions Both treatments were effective at improving pain, functional status, quality of life, and gait features in patients with primary THA. In addition to conventional physical therapy, AOT improved perceived physical function more than written information. Trial Registration Identifier NCT02861638.

AB - Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of action observation therapy (AOT) compared with written information in patients submitted to a physical therapy program after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods We conducted a prospective clinical trial. Twenty-four patients with THA, 62.5% female (aged 69.0 ± 8.5 years), received AOT in addition to conventional physical therapy (experimental group) or written information in addition to conventional physical therapy (exercise and information group) for 10 sessions. Outcomes used were visual analog scale, hip active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index measurements. All measures were collected at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the interventions effects within groups and between groups. Results No relevant baseline differences were observed between groups. Both treatments produced statistically significant improvements on visual analog scale, active and passive range of motion, Barthel Index, SF-36, Tinetti Scale, and Lequesne Index immediately after the intervention (all, P < .001). SF-36 (physical functioning subscale) revealed a statistically significant intergroups difference (P = .02) after treatment. Conclusions Both treatments were effective at improving pain, functional status, quality of life, and gait features in patients with primary THA. In addition to conventional physical therapy, AOT improved perceived physical function more than written information. Trial Registration Identifier NCT02861638.

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Hip Replacement

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995545508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995545508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995545508

VL - 15

SP - 229

EP - 234

JO - Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

JF - Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

SN - 1556-3707

IS - 4

ER -