Effects of the intraneural and subparaneural ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical and electrophysiological comparison

Gianluca Cappelleri, Valeria Libera Eva Cedrati, Luisa Luciana Fedele, Marco Gemma, Laura Camici, Mario Loiero, Mauro Battista Gallazzi, Gabriele Cornaggia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This prospective, randomized, doubleblind study compared the effects of the ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block performed by either intraneural or subparaneural approach followed by an electrophysiological evaluation. We hypothesized that intraneural injection provides a faster onset with a better success rate compared with the subparaneural approach. Methods: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled and randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block injecting 15 mL ropivacaine 1% according to an intraneural injection (group INTRA = 44) or a subparaneural injection (group SUBPARA = 44). The primary end point was the onset time of sensory and motor block, whereas secondary end points were successful, duration of the block, and the variation of the electrophysiological assessment after 5 weeks. The study was registered prior to patient enrollment (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01987128). Results: The median onset time for successful sciatic nerve block in the INTRA group was 10 (5-15 [5-30]) minutes versus 25 (15-35 [5-45])minutes in the SUBPARA group (P <0.001), with a rate of 41/43 (95.3%) comparedwith 25/40 (62.5%) in the SUBPARA group (P <0.001).No difference was found regardless of the duration of the block. Fifty-three patients also performed the electrophysiological assessment at 5 weeks, showing a subclinical, significant reduction in amplitude of the action potentials with no difference between groups. No patients reported any clinical neurological complications after 6 months. Conclusions: In ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, intraneural injection provided a faster onset and better success rate compared with subparaneural. Both techniques resulted in a similar subclinical reduction in amplitude of the sciatic action potentials at 5 weeks after surgery. These findings should not be extended to other approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-437
Number of pages8
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 21 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of the intraneural and subparaneural ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical and electrophysiological comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this