Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study

M. E. Cazzaniga, M. Airoldi, V. Arcangeli, S. Artale, F. Atzori, A. Ballerio, G. V. Bianchi, L. Blasi, S. Campidoglio, M. Ciccarese, M. C. Cursano, M. Piezzo, A. Fabi, L. Ferrari, A. Ferzi, C. Ficorella, A. Frassoldati, A. Fumagalli, O. Garrone, V. GebbiaD. Generali, N. La Verde, M. Maur, A. Michelotti, G. Moretti, A. Musolino, R. Palumbo, M. Pistelli, M. Porpiglia, D. Sartori, C. Scavelli, A. Schirone, A. Turletti, M. R. Valerio, P. Vici, A. Zambelli, L. Clivio, V. Torri, on behalf of, EVA Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting. RESULTS: From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33-83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1, soft tissue (34.7 and viscera (33.2. Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1-7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4-58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2, non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8, anaemia (3.8 and fatigue (3.2. CONCLUSIONS: The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)115-121
Number of pages7
JournalBreast
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017

Keywords

  • Advanced breast cancer, Dose-intensity, everolimus, Fulvestrant, Hormone-receptor positive

Cite this

Cazzaniga, M. E., Airoldi, M., Arcangeli, V., Artale, S., Atzori, F., Ballerio, A., Bianchi, G. V., Blasi, L., Campidoglio, S., Ciccarese, M., Cursano, M. C., Piezzo, M., Fabi, A., Ferrari, L., Ferzi, A., Ficorella, C., Frassoldati, A., Fumagalli, A., Garrone, O., ... Group, EVA. S. (2017). Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study. Breast, 35, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.043