Abstract
Introduction: Few trials have compared different central muscle relaxants in the treatment of spastic palsy. This head-to-head phase 3 trial compares oral eperisone, a central muscle relaxant with a promising activity in spasticity therapy, and oral baclofen. Methods: Patients (>18 years) with moderate to severe spastic palsy were eligible in this double-blind, randomized study; they received eperisone 300 mg/ day or baclofen 60 mg/day for 6 weeks. The efficacy evaluations included: functional analysis (Pedersen's scale, muscular tone, joint range of motion, 10-meter walking time); physiological and pathological reflexes; and electromyography (Hmax/Mmax amplitude ratio and the Wartenberg test). Physicians and patients globally assessed treatment efficacy. Results: Both eperisone (n=40) and baclofen (n=40) significantly improved functionality of lower limbs versus baseline (eperisone: -9.1%, P
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 563-573 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Advances in Therapy |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2009 |
Keywords
- Baclofen
- Central muscle relaxants
- Double-blind
- Eperisone
- Randomized
- Spastic palsy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmacology (medical)
- Medicine(all)