Abstract
The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in refractory sight-threatening retinal vasculitis (RV) during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary aims were to evaluate (i) any impact of concomitant conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and different lines of biologic therapy; (ii) any difference in terms of efficacy between ADA and IFX; (iii) consequences of biotherapies on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); (iv) corticosteroid-sparing effect; and (vi) ocular complications during anti-TNF-α treatment. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were retrospectively collected from the medical records and statistically analyzed. Forty-eight patients (82 eyes) were recruited, 22 (45.8%) of which received IFX and 26 (54.2%) ADA. The percentages of patients achieving RV remission within 3 and 12 months were 54 and 86%, respectively. A significant decrease in RV detection was identified from baseline to 3-month (p < 0.0001) and 12-month (p < 0.0001) assessments and between 3-month and 12-month visits (p = 0.004). No differences were identified in terms of RV resolution between (i) patients undergoing monotherapy and those co-administered with cDMARDs at 3-month (p = 0.560) and 12-month (p = 0.611) follow-up; (ii) biologic-naïve patients and those already exposed to other biologics at 3-month (p = 0.497) and 12-month (p > 0.99) visits; and (iii) patients treated with ADA and those treated with IFX (p = 0.357). During the study period, a statistically significant corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p = 0.0002), while BCVA values did not significantly change (p = 0.950). Anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies have proved excellent results in patients with recalcitrant sight-threatening RV.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2805-2809 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Clinical Rheumatology |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Adalimumab
- Behçet’s disease
- Biologic treatment
- Infliximab
- Uveitis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rheumatology
Cite this
Efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab in recalcitrant retinal vasculitis inadequately responsive to other immunomodulatory therapies. / Fabiani, Claudia; Sota, Jurgen; Rigante, Donato; Vitale, Antonio; Emmi, Giacomo; Lopalco, Giuseppe; Vannozzi, Lorenzo; Guerriero, Silvana; Bitossi, Alice; Orlando, Ida; Franceschini, Rossella; Frediani, Bruno; Galeazzi, Mauro; Iannone, Florenzo; Tosi, Gian Marco; Cantarini, Luca.
In: Clinical Rheumatology, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 2805-2809.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab in recalcitrant retinal vasculitis inadequately responsive to other immunomodulatory therapies
AU - Fabiani, Claudia
AU - Sota, Jurgen
AU - Rigante, Donato
AU - Vitale, Antonio
AU - Emmi, Giacomo
AU - Lopalco, Giuseppe
AU - Vannozzi, Lorenzo
AU - Guerriero, Silvana
AU - Bitossi, Alice
AU - Orlando, Ida
AU - Franceschini, Rossella
AU - Frediani, Bruno
AU - Galeazzi, Mauro
AU - Iannone, Florenzo
AU - Tosi, Gian Marco
AU - Cantarini, Luca
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in refractory sight-threatening retinal vasculitis (RV) during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary aims were to evaluate (i) any impact of concomitant conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and different lines of biologic therapy; (ii) any difference in terms of efficacy between ADA and IFX; (iii) consequences of biotherapies on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); (iv) corticosteroid-sparing effect; and (vi) ocular complications during anti-TNF-α treatment. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were retrospectively collected from the medical records and statistically analyzed. Forty-eight patients (82 eyes) were recruited, 22 (45.8%) of which received IFX and 26 (54.2%) ADA. The percentages of patients achieving RV remission within 3 and 12 months were 54 and 86%, respectively. A significant decrease in RV detection was identified from baseline to 3-month (p < 0.0001) and 12-month (p < 0.0001) assessments and between 3-month and 12-month visits (p = 0.004). No differences were identified in terms of RV resolution between (i) patients undergoing monotherapy and those co-administered with cDMARDs at 3-month (p = 0.560) and 12-month (p = 0.611) follow-up; (ii) biologic-naïve patients and those already exposed to other biologics at 3-month (p = 0.497) and 12-month (p > 0.99) visits; and (iii) patients treated with ADA and those treated with IFX (p = 0.357). During the study period, a statistically significant corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p = 0.0002), while BCVA values did not significantly change (p = 0.950). Anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies have proved excellent results in patients with recalcitrant sight-threatening RV.
AB - The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in refractory sight-threatening retinal vasculitis (RV) during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary aims were to evaluate (i) any impact of concomitant conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and different lines of biologic therapy; (ii) any difference in terms of efficacy between ADA and IFX; (iii) consequences of biotherapies on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); (iv) corticosteroid-sparing effect; and (vi) ocular complications during anti-TNF-α treatment. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were retrospectively collected from the medical records and statistically analyzed. Forty-eight patients (82 eyes) were recruited, 22 (45.8%) of which received IFX and 26 (54.2%) ADA. The percentages of patients achieving RV remission within 3 and 12 months were 54 and 86%, respectively. A significant decrease in RV detection was identified from baseline to 3-month (p < 0.0001) and 12-month (p < 0.0001) assessments and between 3-month and 12-month visits (p = 0.004). No differences were identified in terms of RV resolution between (i) patients undergoing monotherapy and those co-administered with cDMARDs at 3-month (p = 0.560) and 12-month (p = 0.611) follow-up; (ii) biologic-naïve patients and those already exposed to other biologics at 3-month (p = 0.497) and 12-month (p > 0.99) visits; and (iii) patients treated with ADA and those treated with IFX (p = 0.357). During the study period, a statistically significant corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p = 0.0002), while BCVA values did not significantly change (p = 0.950). Anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies have proved excellent results in patients with recalcitrant sight-threatening RV.
KW - Adalimumab
KW - Behçet’s disease
KW - Biologic treatment
KW - Infliximab
KW - Uveitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046901943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046901943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10067-018-4133-z
DO - 10.1007/s10067-018-4133-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046901943
VL - 37
SP - 2805
EP - 2809
JO - Clinical Rheumatology
JF - Clinical Rheumatology
SN - 0770-3198
IS - 10
ER -