TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle
T2 - A multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial
AU - Piccinini, Giulia
AU - Cuccagna, Cristina
AU - Caliandro, Pietro
AU - Coraci, Daniele
AU - Germanotta, Marco
AU - Pecchioli, Cristiano
AU - Padua, Luca
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Background: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle (ESDM) on recovery of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: We enrolled 38 patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries with axonal damage and clinical impairment of two muscles, who were randomly treated with real or sham electrical stimulation (ES). Clinical and neurophysiological examinations were performed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 mo posttreatment, by the same physician who was blinded to the ES allocation. Results: All patients improved but there was no significant beneficial effect of ESDM compared with sham treatment. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESDM for peripheral nerve injuries. However, given the large number of variables related to ES and the heterogeneity in disease etiologies and clinical manifestations, future studies on homogeneous populations using different stimulation protocols may be useful.
AB - Background: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of electrical stimulation of denervated muscle (ESDM) on recovery of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: We enrolled 38 patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries with axonal damage and clinical impairment of two muscles, who were randomly treated with real or sham electrical stimulation (ES). Clinical and neurophysiological examinations were performed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 3 mo posttreatment, by the same physician who was blinded to the ES allocation. Results: All patients improved but there was no significant beneficial effect of ESDM compared with sham treatment. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESDM for peripheral nerve injuries. However, given the large number of variables related to ES and the heterogeneity in disease etiologies and clinical manifestations, future studies on homogeneous populations using different stimulation protocols may be useful.
KW - denervated muscle
KW - electrical stimulation
KW - electromyography
KW - peripheral nerve injuries
KW - recovery of function
KW - rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084049881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084049881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mus.26880
DO - 10.1002/mus.26880
M3 - Article
C2 - 32249950
AN - SCOPUS:85084049881
JO - Muscle and Nerve
JF - Muscle and Nerve
SN - 0148-639X
ER -