Efficacy of perceptive rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a new tool: A randomized clinical study

Giovanni Morone, Marco Iosa, Teresa Paolucci, Augusto Fusco, Rosaria Alcuri, Ennio Spadini, Vincenzo Maria Saraceni, Stefano Paolucci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitative approach, based on a new device, with regard to pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design: Single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: An outpatient academic hospital. Patients: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain. Interventions: Patients were randomized into three groups. Twenty-five subjects received 10 sessions in one month, based on specific perceptive exercises that were performed on a suitably developed device. Twenty-five patients entered a Back School programme. Twenty-five patients comprised a control group that received the same medical and pharmacological assistance as the other groups. Main outcome measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire. Disability was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and Waddell Disability Index. All measurements were recorded before treatment, at the end of the study, and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: General pain relief was recorded in all the groups, which was elicited more quickly in the perceptive treatment group; significant differences in pain scores were observed at the end of treatment (P <0.001 for visual analogue scale and P = 0.001 for Questionnaire) versus the other groups. Disability scores in the perceptive group did not differ significantly from those in the other group, whereas these scores significantly differed between Back School and control groups at the follow-ups (P <0.01 for both scales). Conclusion: Perceptive rehabilitation has immediate positive effects on pain. Back School reduces disabilities at follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-350
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Rehabilitation
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Therapeutics
Medical Assistance
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups
Pain Measurement
Clinical Studies
Outpatients
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pharmacology
Exercise

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • proprioception
  • rehabilitation
  • sensorimotor integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Efficacy of perceptive rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a new tool : A randomized clinical study. / Morone, Giovanni; Iosa, Marco; Paolucci, Teresa; Fusco, Augusto; Alcuri, Rosaria; Spadini, Ennio; Saraceni, Vincenzo Maria; Paolucci, Stefano.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 339-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74ea96ec4bb648d9b691fd80f0b8d1d2,
title = "Efficacy of perceptive rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a new tool: A randomized clinical study",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitative approach, based on a new device, with regard to pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design: Single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: An outpatient academic hospital. Patients: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain. Interventions: Patients were randomized into three groups. Twenty-five subjects received 10 sessions in one month, based on specific perceptive exercises that were performed on a suitably developed device. Twenty-five patients entered a Back School programme. Twenty-five patients comprised a control group that received the same medical and pharmacological assistance as the other groups. Main outcome measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire. Disability was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and Waddell Disability Index. All measurements were recorded before treatment, at the end of the study, and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: General pain relief was recorded in all the groups, which was elicited more quickly in the perceptive treatment group; significant differences in pain scores were observed at the end of treatment (P <0.001 for visual analogue scale and P = 0.001 for Questionnaire) versus the other groups. Disability scores in the perceptive group did not differ significantly from those in the other group, whereas these scores significantly differed between Back School and control groups at the follow-ups (P <0.01 for both scales). Conclusion: Perceptive rehabilitation has immediate positive effects on pain. Back School reduces disabilities at follow-up.",
keywords = "Low back pain, proprioception, rehabilitation, sensorimotor integration",
author = "Giovanni Morone and Marco Iosa and Teresa Paolucci and Augusto Fusco and Rosaria Alcuri and Ennio Spadini and Saraceni, {Vincenzo Maria} and Stefano Paolucci",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0269215511414443",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "339--350",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of perceptive rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a new tool

T2 - A randomized clinical study

AU - Morone, Giovanni

AU - Iosa, Marco

AU - Paolucci, Teresa

AU - Fusco, Augusto

AU - Alcuri, Rosaria

AU - Spadini, Ennio

AU - Saraceni, Vincenzo Maria

AU - Paolucci, Stefano

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitative approach, based on a new device, with regard to pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design: Single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: An outpatient academic hospital. Patients: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain. Interventions: Patients were randomized into three groups. Twenty-five subjects received 10 sessions in one month, based on specific perceptive exercises that were performed on a suitably developed device. Twenty-five patients entered a Back School programme. Twenty-five patients comprised a control group that received the same medical and pharmacological assistance as the other groups. Main outcome measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire. Disability was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and Waddell Disability Index. All measurements were recorded before treatment, at the end of the study, and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: General pain relief was recorded in all the groups, which was elicited more quickly in the perceptive treatment group; significant differences in pain scores were observed at the end of treatment (P <0.001 for visual analogue scale and P = 0.001 for Questionnaire) versus the other groups. Disability scores in the perceptive group did not differ significantly from those in the other group, whereas these scores significantly differed between Back School and control groups at the follow-ups (P <0.01 for both scales). Conclusion: Perceptive rehabilitation has immediate positive effects on pain. Back School reduces disabilities at follow-up.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitative approach, based on a new device, with regard to pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design: Single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: An outpatient academic hospital. Patients: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain. Interventions: Patients were randomized into three groups. Twenty-five subjects received 10 sessions in one month, based on specific perceptive exercises that were performed on a suitably developed device. Twenty-five patients entered a Back School programme. Twenty-five patients comprised a control group that received the same medical and pharmacological assistance as the other groups. Main outcome measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire. Disability was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and Waddell Disability Index. All measurements were recorded before treatment, at the end of the study, and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: General pain relief was recorded in all the groups, which was elicited more quickly in the perceptive treatment group; significant differences in pain scores were observed at the end of treatment (P <0.001 for visual analogue scale and P = 0.001 for Questionnaire) versus the other groups. Disability scores in the perceptive group did not differ significantly from those in the other group, whereas these scores significantly differed between Back School and control groups at the follow-ups (P <0.01 for both scales). Conclusion: Perceptive rehabilitation has immediate positive effects on pain. Back School reduces disabilities at follow-up.

KW - Low back pain

KW - proprioception

KW - rehabilitation

KW - sensorimotor integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858043895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858043895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215511414443

DO - 10.1177/0269215511414443

M3 - Article

C2 - 21965520

AN - SCOPUS:84858043895

VL - 26

SP - 339

EP - 350

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 4

ER -