EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation

News from the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010

F. Zaina, S. Negrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. Since 2007 we have focused our attention to the best available clinical evidence offered by the Cochrane Collaboration. Due to the absence of a speciic Rehabilitation Group (only a Field exists), reviews of PRM interest are in different groups and not easy to ind. Consequently, the EJPRM lists and presents all these reviews systematically. The aim of the present paper was to systematically review all the new rehabilitation papers published in the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010 from the Cochrane Library in order to provide to physicians involved in the ield a summary of the best evidence nowadays available. Methods. The author systematically searched all the new papers of rehabilitative interest in the 8th, 9th and 10th Issues of 2010 of the Cochrane Library. The retrieved papers have been then divided in subgroups on the base of the topic and the Cochrane Groups. Results. The number of included papers was four, all of these were new reviews. Two new reviews deal with neurological rehabilitation , one with musculoskeletal disorders and one with pain. No updated reviews were retrieved. Conclusion. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library are really relevant instruments to improve EBM in medical practice and thus also in the Rehabilitation Field. The present paper can help Rehabilitation Specialists to easily retrieve the conclusions of the most relevant and updated reviews in order to change their clinical practice in a more rapid and effective way.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-535
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume46
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Libraries
Physicians
Pain

Keywords

  • Rehabilitation - Physician's practice patterns - Rehabilitation centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{4b1037627b84475b8fdf02010c7a7761,
title = "EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: News from the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010",
abstract = "Aim. Since 2007 we have focused our attention to the best available clinical evidence offered by the Cochrane Collaboration. Due to the absence of a speciic Rehabilitation Group (only a Field exists), reviews of PRM interest are in different groups and not easy to ind. Consequently, the EJPRM lists and presents all these reviews systematically. The aim of the present paper was to systematically review all the new rehabilitation papers published in the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010 from the Cochrane Library in order to provide to physicians involved in the ield a summary of the best evidence nowadays available. Methods. The author systematically searched all the new papers of rehabilitative interest in the 8th, 9th and 10th Issues of 2010 of the Cochrane Library. The retrieved papers have been then divided in subgroups on the base of the topic and the Cochrane Groups. Results. The number of included papers was four, all of these were new reviews. Two new reviews deal with neurological rehabilitation , one with musculoskeletal disorders and one with pain. No updated reviews were retrieved. Conclusion. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library are really relevant instruments to improve EBM in medical practice and thus also in the Rehabilitation Field. The present paper can help Rehabilitation Specialists to easily retrieve the conclusions of the most relevant and updated reviews in order to change their clinical practice in a more rapid and effective way.",
keywords = "Rehabilitation - Physician's practice patterns - Rehabilitation centers",
author = "F. Zaina and S. Negrini",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "525--535",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1973-9087",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation

T2 - News from the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010

AU - Zaina, F.

AU - Negrini, S.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Aim. Since 2007 we have focused our attention to the best available clinical evidence offered by the Cochrane Collaboration. Due to the absence of a speciic Rehabilitation Group (only a Field exists), reviews of PRM interest are in different groups and not easy to ind. Consequently, the EJPRM lists and presents all these reviews systematically. The aim of the present paper was to systematically review all the new rehabilitation papers published in the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010 from the Cochrane Library in order to provide to physicians involved in the ield a summary of the best evidence nowadays available. Methods. The author systematically searched all the new papers of rehabilitative interest in the 8th, 9th and 10th Issues of 2010 of the Cochrane Library. The retrieved papers have been then divided in subgroups on the base of the topic and the Cochrane Groups. Results. The number of included papers was four, all of these were new reviews. Two new reviews deal with neurological rehabilitation , one with musculoskeletal disorders and one with pain. No updated reviews were retrieved. Conclusion. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library are really relevant instruments to improve EBM in medical practice and thus also in the Rehabilitation Field. The present paper can help Rehabilitation Specialists to easily retrieve the conclusions of the most relevant and updated reviews in order to change their clinical practice in a more rapid and effective way.

AB - Aim. Since 2007 we have focused our attention to the best available clinical evidence offered by the Cochrane Collaboration. Due to the absence of a speciic Rehabilitation Group (only a Field exists), reviews of PRM interest are in different groups and not easy to ind. Consequently, the EJPRM lists and presents all these reviews systematically. The aim of the present paper was to systematically review all the new rehabilitation papers published in the 8th, 9th and 10th issues of 2010 from the Cochrane Library in order to provide to physicians involved in the ield a summary of the best evidence nowadays available. Methods. The author systematically searched all the new papers of rehabilitative interest in the 8th, 9th and 10th Issues of 2010 of the Cochrane Library. The retrieved papers have been then divided in subgroups on the base of the topic and the Cochrane Groups. Results. The number of included papers was four, all of these were new reviews. Two new reviews deal with neurological rehabilitation , one with musculoskeletal disorders and one with pain. No updated reviews were retrieved. Conclusion. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library are really relevant instruments to improve EBM in medical practice and thus also in the Rehabilitation Field. The present paper can help Rehabilitation Specialists to easily retrieve the conclusions of the most relevant and updated reviews in order to change their clinical practice in a more rapid and effective way.

KW - Rehabilitation - Physician's practice patterns - Rehabilitation centers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957817488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957817488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 525

EP - 535

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1973-9087

IS - 4

ER -