Electric to acoustic pitch matching: A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting

Walter D. Nardo, Italo Cantore, Maria Raffaella Marchese, Francesca Cianfrone, Alessandro Scorpecci, Sara Giannantonio, Gaetano Paludetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Poor pitch resolution has been shown to have negative implications for speech and music perception in implanted patients. Surprisingly, works on the subject have not focused much on the impact that the non-correspondence between frequencies allocated to electrodes and perceived frequencies could have on speech and music perception. The aim of the present study is to investigate the correlation between pitch mismatch and speech performance with the implant, and to ascertain the effects of mismatch correction through a mapping function making a personalized frequency reallocation possible. We studied ten postlingually deaf adult patients with detectable bilateral residual hearing, implanted in our Clinic with Cochlear® Nucleus devices. In each test session, we asked the patients to find the best match between the pitch elicited by the residual ipsilateral and contralateral pure tones and the pitch elicited by stimulation of electrodes. We also assessed patients' vowel and consonant recognition performance. Finally, in the only implanted patient in our clinic who had bilateral residual hearing and used a Digisonic DX10/C® device, which makes manual electrode-by-electrode frequency reallocation possible, we modified electrode-assigned frequency ranges on the basis of the pitch matching test results. We found that in none of the studied patients, the electric-to-acoustic pitch matching corresponds to the theoretical assignment pattern. A very strong correlation was detected between the electric-to-acoustic pitch mismatch and patient's speech performance. In the Digisonic® patient, a remarkable improvement in all phoneme recognition scores was obtained 1 month after frequency reallocation. In the light of our results, we propose to assess, whenever possible, any frequency-to-electrode mismatch in all implanted patients, and correct it through mapping programs allowing manual frequency reallocation for the pitch-matched electrodes, and automated allocation of the non-tested electrodes. Cochlear implantation should therefore be proposed when residuals for all frequencies are still present, at least in one ear, so as to allow optimal alignment between allocated and subjectively perceived frequencies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1328
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume265
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Acoustics
Electrodes
Speech Perception
Music
Hearing
Cochlear Nucleus
Cochlear Implantation
Equipment and Supplies
Ear

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Matching
  • Performance
  • Pitch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Electric to acoustic pitch matching : A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting. / Nardo, Walter D.; Cantore, Italo; Marchese, Maria Raffaella; Cianfrone, Francesca; Scorpecci, Alessandro; Giannantonio, Sara; Paludetti, Gaetano.

In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 265, No. 11, 11.2008, p. 1321-1328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nardo, Walter D. ; Cantore, Italo ; Marchese, Maria Raffaella ; Cianfrone, Francesca ; Scorpecci, Alessandro ; Giannantonio, Sara ; Paludetti, Gaetano. / Electric to acoustic pitch matching : A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting. In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2008 ; Vol. 265, No. 11. pp. 1321-1328.
@article{1e11494101eb4d59ac72673d24bc08a6,
title = "Electric to acoustic pitch matching: A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting",
abstract = "Poor pitch resolution has been shown to have negative implications for speech and music perception in implanted patients. Surprisingly, works on the subject have not focused much on the impact that the non-correspondence between frequencies allocated to electrodes and perceived frequencies could have on speech and music perception. The aim of the present study is to investigate the correlation between pitch mismatch and speech performance with the implant, and to ascertain the effects of mismatch correction through a mapping function making a personalized frequency reallocation possible. We studied ten postlingually deaf adult patients with detectable bilateral residual hearing, implanted in our Clinic with Cochlear{\circledR} Nucleus devices. In each test session, we asked the patients to find the best match between the pitch elicited by the residual ipsilateral and contralateral pure tones and the pitch elicited by stimulation of electrodes. We also assessed patients' vowel and consonant recognition performance. Finally, in the only implanted patient in our clinic who had bilateral residual hearing and used a Digisonic DX10/C{\circledR} device, which makes manual electrode-by-electrode frequency reallocation possible, we modified electrode-assigned frequency ranges on the basis of the pitch matching test results. We found that in none of the studied patients, the electric-to-acoustic pitch matching corresponds to the theoretical assignment pattern. A very strong correlation was detected between the electric-to-acoustic pitch mismatch and patient's speech performance. In the Digisonic{\circledR} patient, a remarkable improvement in all phoneme recognition scores was obtained 1 month after frequency reallocation. In the light of our results, we propose to assess, whenever possible, any frequency-to-electrode mismatch in all implanted patients, and correct it through mapping programs allowing manual frequency reallocation for the pitch-matched electrodes, and automated allocation of the non-tested electrodes. Cochlear implantation should therefore be proposed when residuals for all frequencies are still present, at least in one ear, so as to allow optimal alignment between allocated and subjectively perceived frequencies.",
keywords = "Cochlear implant, Matching, Performance, Pitch",
author = "Nardo, {Walter D.} and Italo Cantore and Marchese, {Maria Raffaella} and Francesca Cianfrone and Alessandro Scorpecci and Sara Giannantonio and Gaetano Paludetti",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00405-008-0655-3",
language = "English",
volume = "265",
pages = "1321--1328",
journal = "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology",
issn = "0937-4477",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electric to acoustic pitch matching

T2 - A possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting

AU - Nardo, Walter D.

AU - Cantore, Italo

AU - Marchese, Maria Raffaella

AU - Cianfrone, Francesca

AU - Scorpecci, Alessandro

AU - Giannantonio, Sara

AU - Paludetti, Gaetano

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Poor pitch resolution has been shown to have negative implications for speech and music perception in implanted patients. Surprisingly, works on the subject have not focused much on the impact that the non-correspondence between frequencies allocated to electrodes and perceived frequencies could have on speech and music perception. The aim of the present study is to investigate the correlation between pitch mismatch and speech performance with the implant, and to ascertain the effects of mismatch correction through a mapping function making a personalized frequency reallocation possible. We studied ten postlingually deaf adult patients with detectable bilateral residual hearing, implanted in our Clinic with Cochlear® Nucleus devices. In each test session, we asked the patients to find the best match between the pitch elicited by the residual ipsilateral and contralateral pure tones and the pitch elicited by stimulation of electrodes. We also assessed patients' vowel and consonant recognition performance. Finally, in the only implanted patient in our clinic who had bilateral residual hearing and used a Digisonic DX10/C® device, which makes manual electrode-by-electrode frequency reallocation possible, we modified electrode-assigned frequency ranges on the basis of the pitch matching test results. We found that in none of the studied patients, the electric-to-acoustic pitch matching corresponds to the theoretical assignment pattern. A very strong correlation was detected between the electric-to-acoustic pitch mismatch and patient's speech performance. In the Digisonic® patient, a remarkable improvement in all phoneme recognition scores was obtained 1 month after frequency reallocation. In the light of our results, we propose to assess, whenever possible, any frequency-to-electrode mismatch in all implanted patients, and correct it through mapping programs allowing manual frequency reallocation for the pitch-matched electrodes, and automated allocation of the non-tested electrodes. Cochlear implantation should therefore be proposed when residuals for all frequencies are still present, at least in one ear, so as to allow optimal alignment between allocated and subjectively perceived frequencies.

AB - Poor pitch resolution has been shown to have negative implications for speech and music perception in implanted patients. Surprisingly, works on the subject have not focused much on the impact that the non-correspondence between frequencies allocated to electrodes and perceived frequencies could have on speech and music perception. The aim of the present study is to investigate the correlation between pitch mismatch and speech performance with the implant, and to ascertain the effects of mismatch correction through a mapping function making a personalized frequency reallocation possible. We studied ten postlingually deaf adult patients with detectable bilateral residual hearing, implanted in our Clinic with Cochlear® Nucleus devices. In each test session, we asked the patients to find the best match between the pitch elicited by the residual ipsilateral and contralateral pure tones and the pitch elicited by stimulation of electrodes. We also assessed patients' vowel and consonant recognition performance. Finally, in the only implanted patient in our clinic who had bilateral residual hearing and used a Digisonic DX10/C® device, which makes manual electrode-by-electrode frequency reallocation possible, we modified electrode-assigned frequency ranges on the basis of the pitch matching test results. We found that in none of the studied patients, the electric-to-acoustic pitch matching corresponds to the theoretical assignment pattern. A very strong correlation was detected between the electric-to-acoustic pitch mismatch and patient's speech performance. In the Digisonic® patient, a remarkable improvement in all phoneme recognition scores was obtained 1 month after frequency reallocation. In the light of our results, we propose to assess, whenever possible, any frequency-to-electrode mismatch in all implanted patients, and correct it through mapping programs allowing manual frequency reallocation for the pitch-matched electrodes, and automated allocation of the non-tested electrodes. Cochlear implantation should therefore be proposed when residuals for all frequencies are still present, at least in one ear, so as to allow optimal alignment between allocated and subjectively perceived frequencies.

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Matching

KW - Performance

KW - Pitch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52449118829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52449118829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00405-008-0655-3

DO - 10.1007/s00405-008-0655-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 18379812

AN - SCOPUS:52449118829

VL - 265

SP - 1321

EP - 1328

JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

SN - 0937-4477

IS - 11

ER -