Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators: A systematic evaluation

Fulvio Kette, Aldo Locatelli, Marcella Bozzola, Alberto Zoli, Yongqin Li, Marco Salmoiraghi, Giuseppe Ristagno, Aida Andreassi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Assessment and comparison of the electrical parameters (energy, current, first and second phase waveform duration) among eighteen AEDs. Method: Engineering bench tests for a descriptive systematic evaluation in commercially available AEDs. AEDs were tested through an ECG simulator, an impedance simulator, an oscilloscope and a measuring device detecting energy delivered, peak and average current, and duration of first and second phase of the biphasic waveforms. All tests were performed at the engineering facility of the Lombardia Regional Emergency Service (AREU). Results: Large variations in the energy delivered at the first shock were observed. The trend of current highlighted a progressive decline concurrent with the increases of impedance. First and second phase duration varied substantially among the AEDs using the exponential biphasic waveform, unlike rectilinear waveform AEDs in which phase duration remained relatively constant. Conclusions: There is a large variability in the electrical features of the AEDs tested. Energy is likely not to be the best indicator for strength dose selection. Current and shock duration should be both considered when approaching the technical features of AEDs. These findings may prompt further investigations to define the optimal current and duration of the shock waves to increase the success rate in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1596-1603
Number of pages8
JournalResuscitation
Volume84
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Defibrillators
Electric Impedance
Shock
Electrocardiography
Emergencies
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Automated external defibrillators
  • Current
  • Energy
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Waveform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Kette, F., Locatelli, A., Bozzola, M., Zoli, A., Li, Y., Salmoiraghi, M., ... Andreassi, A. (2013). Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators: A systematic evaluation. Resuscitation, 84(11), 1596-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.017

Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators : A systematic evaluation. / Kette, Fulvio; Locatelli, Aldo; Bozzola, Marcella; Zoli, Alberto; Li, Yongqin; Salmoiraghi, Marco; Ristagno, Giuseppe; Andreassi, Aida.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 84, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1596-1603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kette, F, Locatelli, A, Bozzola, M, Zoli, A, Li, Y, Salmoiraghi, M, Ristagno, G & Andreassi, A 2013, 'Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators: A systematic evaluation', Resuscitation, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1596-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.017
Kette, Fulvio ; Locatelli, Aldo ; Bozzola, Marcella ; Zoli, Alberto ; Li, Yongqin ; Salmoiraghi, Marco ; Ristagno, Giuseppe ; Andreassi, Aida. / Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators : A systematic evaluation. In: Resuscitation. 2013 ; Vol. 84, No. 11. pp. 1596-1603.
@article{87f13fdb8fd64719a13d0fd419208327,
title = "Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators: A systematic evaluation",
abstract = "Aim: Assessment and comparison of the electrical parameters (energy, current, first and second phase waveform duration) among eighteen AEDs. Method: Engineering bench tests for a descriptive systematic evaluation in commercially available AEDs. AEDs were tested through an ECG simulator, an impedance simulator, an oscilloscope and a measuring device detecting energy delivered, peak and average current, and duration of first and second phase of the biphasic waveforms. All tests were performed at the engineering facility of the Lombardia Regional Emergency Service (AREU). Results: Large variations in the energy delivered at the first shock were observed. The trend of current highlighted a progressive decline concurrent with the increases of impedance. First and second phase duration varied substantially among the AEDs using the exponential biphasic waveform, unlike rectilinear waveform AEDs in which phase duration remained relatively constant. Conclusions: There is a large variability in the electrical features of the AEDs tested. Energy is likely not to be the best indicator for strength dose selection. Current and shock duration should be both considered when approaching the technical features of AEDs. These findings may prompt further investigations to define the optimal current and duration of the shock waves to increase the success rate in the clinical setting.",
keywords = "Automated external defibrillators, Current, Energy, Ventricular fibrillation, Waveform",
author = "Fulvio Kette and Aldo Locatelli and Marcella Bozzola and Alberto Zoli and Yongqin Li and Marco Salmoiraghi and Giuseppe Ristagno and Aida Andreassi",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.017",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "1596--1603",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrical features of eighteen automated external defibrillators

T2 - A systematic evaluation

AU - Kette, Fulvio

AU - Locatelli, Aldo

AU - Bozzola, Marcella

AU - Zoli, Alberto

AU - Li, Yongqin

AU - Salmoiraghi, Marco

AU - Ristagno, Giuseppe

AU - Andreassi, Aida

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Aim: Assessment and comparison of the electrical parameters (energy, current, first and second phase waveform duration) among eighteen AEDs. Method: Engineering bench tests for a descriptive systematic evaluation in commercially available AEDs. AEDs were tested through an ECG simulator, an impedance simulator, an oscilloscope and a measuring device detecting energy delivered, peak and average current, and duration of first and second phase of the biphasic waveforms. All tests were performed at the engineering facility of the Lombardia Regional Emergency Service (AREU). Results: Large variations in the energy delivered at the first shock were observed. The trend of current highlighted a progressive decline concurrent with the increases of impedance. First and second phase duration varied substantially among the AEDs using the exponential biphasic waveform, unlike rectilinear waveform AEDs in which phase duration remained relatively constant. Conclusions: There is a large variability in the electrical features of the AEDs tested. Energy is likely not to be the best indicator for strength dose selection. Current and shock duration should be both considered when approaching the technical features of AEDs. These findings may prompt further investigations to define the optimal current and duration of the shock waves to increase the success rate in the clinical setting.

AB - Aim: Assessment and comparison of the electrical parameters (energy, current, first and second phase waveform duration) among eighteen AEDs. Method: Engineering bench tests for a descriptive systematic evaluation in commercially available AEDs. AEDs were tested through an ECG simulator, an impedance simulator, an oscilloscope and a measuring device detecting energy delivered, peak and average current, and duration of first and second phase of the biphasic waveforms. All tests were performed at the engineering facility of the Lombardia Regional Emergency Service (AREU). Results: Large variations in the energy delivered at the first shock were observed. The trend of current highlighted a progressive decline concurrent with the increases of impedance. First and second phase duration varied substantially among the AEDs using the exponential biphasic waveform, unlike rectilinear waveform AEDs in which phase duration remained relatively constant. Conclusions: There is a large variability in the electrical features of the AEDs tested. Energy is likely not to be the best indicator for strength dose selection. Current and shock duration should be both considered when approaching the technical features of AEDs. These findings may prompt further investigations to define the optimal current and duration of the shock waves to increase the success rate in the clinical setting.

KW - Automated external defibrillators

KW - Current

KW - Energy

KW - Ventricular fibrillation

KW - Waveform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886770513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886770513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 23735652

AN - SCOPUS:84886770513

VL - 84

SP - 1596

EP - 1603

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 11

ER -