Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws: Prospective randomized double-blind study

Cesare Faldini, Matteo Cadossi, Deianira Luciani, Emanuele Betti, Eugenio Chiarello, Sandro Giannini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background To determine the effect of pulsed electro-magnetic fields (PEMF) on time to healing, onset of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and pain in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Methods Seventy-seven patients had their fracture fixed with cannulated screws. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive either an active or placebo PEMF stimulator and were instructed to use it for at least 8 h per day for 90 days. Patient compliance was monitored by a clock inside the stimulator. The active stimulators generated PEMF at 75 Hz, 1.3 m/s impulse length, 2 mTesla peak magnetic field. Fracture healing and onset of osteonecrosis were evaluated on radiographs obtained 30, 60 and 90 days and then at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. During the first three visits pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Results Fracture healing was achieved in 94% of active compliant patients compared with 69% of the placebo group. The percentage of osteonecrosis was higher in the placebo group but does not reach statistical significance (37% vs. 49%). Pain assessment with the VAS evidenced significantly lower levels in the compliant active group compared with the placebo group at all visits. No differences were observed between patients who were noncompliant with the PEMF protocol and the placebo group. Conclusions This study shows that stimulation with PEMF accelerates fracture healing and reduces pain, leading to a better quality of life in patients suffering femoral neck fractures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-287
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Orthopaedic Practice
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Femoral Neck Fractures
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Bone Development
Magnetic Fields
Double-Blind Method
Placebos
Fracture Healing
Osteonecrosis
Visual Analog Scale
Pain
Pain Measurement
Patient Compliance
Thigh
Headache
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Bone growth stimulation
  • Femoral neck fractures
  • PEMF
  • Screw fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws : Prospective randomized double-blind study. / Faldini, Cesare; Cadossi, Matteo; Luciani, Deianira; Betti, Emanuele; Chiarello, Eugenio; Giannini, Sandro.

In: Current Orthopaedic Practice, Vol. 21, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 282-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Faldini, Cesare ; Cadossi, Matteo ; Luciani, Deianira ; Betti, Emanuele ; Chiarello, Eugenio ; Giannini, Sandro. / Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws : Prospective randomized double-blind study. In: Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 282-287.
@article{b865f12bfaa1440ca410d68f81dd249d,
title = "Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws: Prospective randomized double-blind study",
abstract = "Background To determine the effect of pulsed electro-magnetic fields (PEMF) on time to healing, onset of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and pain in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Methods Seventy-seven patients had their fracture fixed with cannulated screws. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive either an active or placebo PEMF stimulator and were instructed to use it for at least 8 h per day for 90 days. Patient compliance was monitored by a clock inside the stimulator. The active stimulators generated PEMF at 75 Hz, 1.3 m/s impulse length, 2 mTesla peak magnetic field. Fracture healing and onset of osteonecrosis were evaluated on radiographs obtained 30, 60 and 90 days and then at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. During the first three visits pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Results Fracture healing was achieved in 94{\%} of active compliant patients compared with 69{\%} of the placebo group. The percentage of osteonecrosis was higher in the placebo group but does not reach statistical significance (37{\%} vs. 49{\%}). Pain assessment with the VAS evidenced significantly lower levels in the compliant active group compared with the placebo group at all visits. No differences were observed between patients who were noncompliant with the PEMF protocol and the placebo group. Conclusions This study shows that stimulation with PEMF accelerates fracture healing and reduces pain, leading to a better quality of life in patients suffering femoral neck fractures.",
keywords = "Bone growth stimulation, Femoral neck fractures, PEMF, Screw fixation",
author = "Cesare Faldini and Matteo Cadossi and Deianira Luciani and Emanuele Betti and Eugenio Chiarello and Sandro Giannini",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d4880f",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "282--287",
journal = "Current Orthopaedic Practice",
issn = "1940-7041",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws

T2 - Prospective randomized double-blind study

AU - Faldini, Cesare

AU - Cadossi, Matteo

AU - Luciani, Deianira

AU - Betti, Emanuele

AU - Chiarello, Eugenio

AU - Giannini, Sandro

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Background To determine the effect of pulsed electro-magnetic fields (PEMF) on time to healing, onset of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and pain in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Methods Seventy-seven patients had their fracture fixed with cannulated screws. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive either an active or placebo PEMF stimulator and were instructed to use it for at least 8 h per day for 90 days. Patient compliance was monitored by a clock inside the stimulator. The active stimulators generated PEMF at 75 Hz, 1.3 m/s impulse length, 2 mTesla peak magnetic field. Fracture healing and onset of osteonecrosis were evaluated on radiographs obtained 30, 60 and 90 days and then at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. During the first three visits pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Results Fracture healing was achieved in 94% of active compliant patients compared with 69% of the placebo group. The percentage of osteonecrosis was higher in the placebo group but does not reach statistical significance (37% vs. 49%). Pain assessment with the VAS evidenced significantly lower levels in the compliant active group compared with the placebo group at all visits. No differences were observed between patients who were noncompliant with the PEMF protocol and the placebo group. Conclusions This study shows that stimulation with PEMF accelerates fracture healing and reduces pain, leading to a better quality of life in patients suffering femoral neck fractures.

AB - Background To determine the effect of pulsed electro-magnetic fields (PEMF) on time to healing, onset of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and pain in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Methods Seventy-seven patients had their fracture fixed with cannulated screws. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive either an active or placebo PEMF stimulator and were instructed to use it for at least 8 h per day for 90 days. Patient compliance was monitored by a clock inside the stimulator. The active stimulators generated PEMF at 75 Hz, 1.3 m/s impulse length, 2 mTesla peak magnetic field. Fracture healing and onset of osteonecrosis were evaluated on radiographs obtained 30, 60 and 90 days and then at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. During the first three visits pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Results Fracture healing was achieved in 94% of active compliant patients compared with 69% of the placebo group. The percentage of osteonecrosis was higher in the placebo group but does not reach statistical significance (37% vs. 49%). Pain assessment with the VAS evidenced significantly lower levels in the compliant active group compared with the placebo group at all visits. No differences were observed between patients who were noncompliant with the PEMF protocol and the placebo group. Conclusions This study shows that stimulation with PEMF accelerates fracture healing and reduces pain, leading to a better quality of life in patients suffering femoral neck fractures.

KW - Bone growth stimulation

KW - Femoral neck fractures

KW - PEMF

KW - Screw fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953009027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953009027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d4880f

DO - 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d4880f

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953009027

VL - 21

SP - 282

EP - 287

JO - Current Orthopaedic Practice

JF - Current Orthopaedic Practice

SN - 1940-7041

IS - 3

ER -