Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions

A systematic review

Antonella De Ceglie, Cesare Hassan, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Takahisa Matsuda, Yutaka Saito, Lorenzo Ridola, Pradeep Bhandari, Federica Boeri, Massimo Conio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal lesions. Methods: A literature search was conducted from January 2000 to May 2015. The main outcomes were: recurrence after ". en bloc" and ". piecemeal" resection; procedure related adverse events; the EMR endoscopic success rate and the completely eradicated resection rate (R0) after ESD. Results: A total of 66 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 17950 (EMR: 11.873; ESD: 6077). Recurrence rate was higher in the EMR than ESD group (765/7303l vs. 50/3910 OR 8.19, 95% CI 6.2-10.9 p.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 12 2016

Fingerprint

Recurrence
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Safety

Keywords

  • Colorectal lesion
  • EMR
  • Endoscopic mucosa resection
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • ESD
  • Laterally spreading tumor
  • LST

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions : A systematic review. / De Ceglie, Antonella; Hassan, Cesare; Mangiavillano, Benedetto; Matsuda, Takahisa; Saito, Yutaka; Ridola, Lorenzo; Bhandari, Pradeep; Boeri, Federica; Conio, Massimo.

In: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 12.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Ceglie, Antonella ; Hassan, Cesare ; Mangiavillano, Benedetto ; Matsuda, Takahisa ; Saito, Yutaka ; Ridola, Lorenzo ; Bhandari, Pradeep ; Boeri, Federica ; Conio, Massimo. / Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions : A systematic review. In: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2016.
@article{f87db52c044f44418037ebf3710eee9b,
title = "Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review",
abstract = "Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal lesions. Methods: A literature search was conducted from January 2000 to May 2015. The main outcomes were: recurrence after {"}. en bloc{"} and {"}. piecemeal{"} resection; procedure related adverse events; the EMR endoscopic success rate and the completely eradicated resection rate (R0) after ESD. Results: A total of 66 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 17950 (EMR: 11.873; ESD: 6077). Recurrence rate was higher in the EMR than ESD group (765/7303l vs. 50/3910 OR 8.19, 95{\%} CI 6.2-10.9 p.",
keywords = "Colorectal lesion, EMR, Endoscopic mucosa resection, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, ESD, Laterally spreading tumor, LST",
author = "{De Ceglie}, Antonella and Cesare Hassan and Benedetto Mangiavillano and Takahisa Matsuda and Yutaka Saito and Lorenzo Ridola and Pradeep Bhandari and Federica Boeri and Massimo Conio",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology",
issn = "1040-8428",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions

T2 - A systematic review

AU - De Ceglie, Antonella

AU - Hassan, Cesare

AU - Mangiavillano, Benedetto

AU - Matsuda, Takahisa

AU - Saito, Yutaka

AU - Ridola, Lorenzo

AU - Bhandari, Pradeep

AU - Boeri, Federica

AU - Conio, Massimo

PY - 2016/1/12

Y1 - 2016/1/12

N2 - Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal lesions. Methods: A literature search was conducted from January 2000 to May 2015. The main outcomes were: recurrence after ". en bloc" and ". piecemeal" resection; procedure related adverse events; the EMR endoscopic success rate and the completely eradicated resection rate (R0) after ESD. Results: A total of 66 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 17950 (EMR: 11.873; ESD: 6077). Recurrence rate was higher in the EMR than ESD group (765/7303l vs. 50/3910 OR 8.19, 95% CI 6.2-10.9 p.

AB - Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal lesions. Methods: A literature search was conducted from January 2000 to May 2015. The main outcomes were: recurrence after ". en bloc" and ". piecemeal" resection; procedure related adverse events; the EMR endoscopic success rate and the completely eradicated resection rate (R0) after ESD. Results: A total of 66 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 17950 (EMR: 11.873; ESD: 6077). Recurrence rate was higher in the EMR than ESD group (765/7303l vs. 50/3910 OR 8.19, 95% CI 6.2-10.9 p.

KW - Colorectal lesion

KW - EMR

KW - Endoscopic mucosa resection

KW - Endoscopic submucosal dissection

KW - ESD

KW - Laterally spreading tumor

KW - LST

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979697066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979697066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008

M3 - Article

JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

SN - 1040-8428

ER -